PFAS Filtration Market

PFAS Filtration Market by Technology (Water Treatment Systems, Water Treatment Chemicals), Place of Treatment (In-Situ, Ex-Situ), Remediation Technology, Environmental Medium, Contaminant Type, and Region - Global Forecast to 2029

Report Code: CH 9022 May, 2024, by marketsandmarkets.com

Updated on : June 14, 2024

PFAS Filtration Market

The PFAS filtration market is valued at USD 2.0 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 2.8 billion by 2029, growing at 7.1% cagr from 2024 to 2029. PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) filtration is a critical process aimed at removing these persistent and potentially harmful chemicals from water sources. PFAS are widely used in industrial and consumer products for their water and grease-resistant properties but pose environmental and health risks due to their persistence and bioaccumulative nature. Filtration technologies play a crucial role in mitigating these risks by effectively capturing PFAS molecules from contaminated water. Common filtration methods include activated carbon adsorption, which utilizes porous carbon materials to trap PFAS molecules, and ion exchange processes that replace PFAS ions with less harmful ions. Membrane filtration techniques like reverse osmosis are also effective in separating PFAS based on size and charge. These technologies are continuously evolving to meet stringent regulatory standards and address growing concerns about PFAS contamination in drinking water and environmental ecosystems globally.

Attractive Opportunities in the PFAS Filtration Market

PFAS Filtration Market

To know about the assumptions considered for the study, Request for Free Sample Report

PFAS Filtration Market

PFAS Filtration Market Dynamics

Driver: Increasing regulatory scrutiny and tightening of environmental regulations regarding PFAS contamination

Increasing regulatory scrutiny and the tightening of environmental regulations regarding PFAS market are shaping the demand for remediation solutions in the US. The recognition of PFAS as persistent, bioaccumulative, and potentially harmful contaminants has prompted regulatory bodies at both the federal and state levels to enact stringent measures to address PFAS contamination and mitigate associated risks.

At the federal level, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has taken steps to address PFAS contamination through various initiatives and regulatory actions. In 2019, the EPA issued a PFAS Action Plan outlining strategies to address PFAS contamination, including monitoring, research, and regulatory actions. Additionally, the EPA has developed health advisories and established lifetime health advisory levels for PFAS compounds in drinking water, providing guidance for regulatory compliance and remediation efforts. Furthermore, the EPA has initiated regulatory proceedings to designate PFAS chemicals as hazardous substances under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), which would trigger comprehensive cleanup requirements for PFAS-contaminated sites nationwide.

Furthermore, individual states have implemented their own regulations and guidelines to address PFAS contamination based on local conditions and concerns. States such as Michigan, New Jersey, and California have been at the forefront of PFAS regulation, enacting laws and regulations to establish maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for PFAS compounds in drinking water and surface water. For example, Michigan has established MCLs for several PFAS compounds, including perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), in drinking water, triggering extensive monitoring and remediation efforts statewide.

In addition to regulatory actions specific to drinking water, states have also implemented regulations addressing PFAS contamination in other environmental media, such as soil and groundwater. These regulations often include requirements for site investigation, remediation, and reporting of PFAS contamination, driving demand for remediation solutions and services. These regulatory actions drive demand for remediation solutions by establishing clear requirements and standards for addressing PFAS contamination and ensuring regulatory compliance at contaminated sites nationwide.

Restraint: Expensive and complex remediation process

The PFAS remediation process is very complex and expensive. The complexity arises from several interrelated factors, including the persistent and widespread nature of PFAS contamination, the diverse range of affected environmental media, and the limited efficacy of conventional treatment methods. Addressing PFAS contamination often requires a multifaceted approach involving various treatment technologies and remediation techniques tailored to specific site conditions and contaminant characteristics. Moreover, the intricate chemistry of PFAS compounds, characterized by their stability and resistance to degradation, further complicates the remediation process. Furthermore, the costliness of PFAS remediation is driven by several factors, including the need for specialized treatment equipment, consumables, and skilled personnel. PFAS filtration technologies often require sophisticated infrastructure and high-performance filtration systems capable of effectively capturing and removing PFAS compounds from contaminated water sources. Additionally, the scale and scope of remediation efforts, particularly at large-scale contaminated sites or municipal water treatment facilities, can significantly escalate costs. Moreover, ongoing monitoring and regulatory compliance requirements impose additional financial burdens on remediation projects, further exacerbating the costliness of PFAS filtration.

Maintenance of PFAS filtration systems also presents a considerable ongoing expense. Regular maintenance and monitoring are essential to ensure the continued effectiveness and efficiency of filtration systems in removing PFAS contaminants from water sources. This includes routine inspections, filter replacements, and calibration of equipment to maintain optimal performance. Moreover, the need for proper disposal of spent filter media and treatment residuals adds to the overall maintenance costs. Additionally, as treatment technologies evolve and regulatory requirements change, periodic upgrades and modifications may be necessary to ensure compliance and effectiveness, further contributing to the maintenance expenses associated with PFAS filtration systems. So, the expensive and complex nature of PFAS remediation, coupled with the ongoing maintenance costs, poses significant restraints for the PFAS filtration market.

Opportunity: US PFAS treatment firms have significant potential to expand globally into markets grappling with increasing PFAS contamination

Across the globe, countries are grappling with the pervasive presence of PFAS compounds in their water supplies, soil, and air, necessitating urgent remediation efforts to mitigate the associated health and environmental risks. Countries such as Australia, Canada, European nations, and parts of Asia, including China and India, have witnessed a surge in PFAS contamination incidents, prompting heightened regulatory scrutiny and public outcry.

In response to the escalating PFAS crisis, many countries have enacted stringent regulations and guidelines to address PFAS contamination and protect public health. For instance, the European Union has proposed regulations to restrict the use of PFAS chemicals in various consumer products and establish strict limits on PFAS levels in drinking water and food. Similarly, Australia has implemented comprehensive PFAS management frameworks, including guidelines for soil and water contamination and health-based guidance values for PFAS compounds in drinking water. In Canada, the federal government has established interim guidelines for PFAS in drinking water, and several provinces have developed their own regulations to address PFAS contamination.

Moreover, government support and funding initiatives further bolster the opportunities for US-based PFAS treatment companies to expand internationally. Many countries have allocated substantial resources to support PFAS remediation efforts, including funding for research and development of innovative treatment technologies and financial assistance for contaminated site cleanup projects. For example, the Australian government has established dedicated funding programs, such as the National PFAS Contamination Response Plan, to address PFAS contamination and support affected communities. Similarly, Canada has allocated funds for PFAS research and remediation projects through initiatives like the Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan. Furthermore, international collaborations and partnerships present avenues for US-based PFAS treatment companies to leverage their expertise and technology to address PFAS contamination on a global scale. By forging alliances with local stakeholders, government agencies, and international organizations, US-based companies can navigate regulatory complexities, access new markets, and demonstrate the efficacy of their PFAS treatment solutions. In conclusion, the growing global concern over PFAS contamination represents a strategic opportunity for US-based PFAS treatment companies to expand their footprint and make a meaningful impact on a global scale.

Challenge: Proper management of treatment residuals generated during PFAS treatment.

Proper management of treatment residuals generated during PFAS treatment presents multifaceted challenges stemming from both the nature of the contaminants and the treatment processes employed. Residuals are typically generated as byproducts of PFAS treatment methods such as adsorption, filtration, or chemical oxidation. These residuals often consist of concentrated PFAS compounds adsorbed onto treatment media, spent filter cartridges, or sludge from precipitation or coagulation processes.

The challenges associated with managing these residuals are manifold. Disposal of PFAS-laden residuals requires careful consideration due to the persistent and bioaccumulative nature of PFAS compounds, which pose long-term environmental risks if not handled properly. Conventional disposal methods such as landfilling may inadvertently contribute to the spread of PFAS contamination, as leaching from landfills can result in groundwater or surface water contamination. Incineration, another common disposal method, can release PFAS compounds into the atmosphere unless stringent emission controls are in place.

Moreover, the volume and composition of PFAS treatment residuals can vary widely depending on factors such as the type of treatment technology used, the concentration of PFAS contaminants in the source water, and the duration of treatment. Managing these diverse residuals requires tailored approaches and specialized expertise to ensure effective containment and minimize recontamination risks. Additionally, regulatory requirements governing the handling, transport, and disposal of PFAS residuals add complexity to the management process, requiring compliance with stringent standards to protect public health and the environment.

The improper management of PFAS treatment residuals can have far-reaching consequences, including the potential for recontamination of water sources, soil, or air, and the perpetuation of PFAS pollution. Inadequate disposal practices may also result in legal liabilities and reputational damage for companies involved in PFAS remediation activities. As such, the proper management of treatment residuals is essential to ensure the efficacy of PFAS treatment efforts and prevent unintended environmental harm.

PFAS Filtration
Market Ecosystem

PFAS Filtration Market Ecosystem

Source: Secondary Research, Interviews with Experts, and MarketsandMarkets Analysis

"Municipal PFAS treatment type Segment type was the largest segment for PFAS filtration market in 2023, in terms of value."

Municipalities across the world are increasingly confronted with the urgent task of treating water contaminated with PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), pervasive pollutants found in industrial and consumer products. Instances of PFAS contamination have been reported in cities like Hoosick Falls, New York, and Veneto, Italy, underscoring the global nature of this environmental concern. To address these challenges, municipalities deploy advanced filtration technologies such as activated carbon and ion exchange systems. Activated carbon filtration effectively captures PFAS molecules by adsorbing them onto its porous surface, while ion exchange processes replace PFAS ions with harmless ions in the water. These methods are critical for meeting stringent drinking water standards and safeguarding public health worldwide.

"Asia Pacific was the fastest growing market for PFAS filtration, in terms of value."

The Asia Pacific region is experiencing rapid growth in PFAS filtration due to expanding industrialization, urbanization, and heightened environmental awareness. Countries such as China, India, and Japan are facing increasing challenges from PFAS contamination in water sources, driven by industrial activities and urban development. This has prompted stringent regulatory measures and investments in advanced filtration technologies like activated carbon and membrane filtration. As governments and industries prioritize water quality and environmental sustainability, the demand for effective PFAS filtration solutions continues to rise, positioning Asia Pacific as a dynamic and fast-growing market in the global effort to manage PFAS contamination.

PFAS Filtration Market by Region

To know about the assumptions considered for the study, download the pdf brochure

PFAS Filtration Market Players

The key players in this market Veolia (France) , AECOM (US), WSP (Canada), Clean Earth (US), Wood (UK), Xylem (US), Jacobs (US), TRC Companies, Inc. (US), Battelle Memorial Institute (US), Cyclopure, Inc. (US).

PFAS Filtration Market Report Scope

Report Metric

Details

Years considered for the study

2020-2022

Base Year

2023

Forecast period

2024–2029

Units considered

 Value (USD Billion)

Segments

Technology, Place of Treatment, End-use Industry , Remediation Technology, Environmental Medium, Containment Type, Service Type and Region

Regions

Asia Pacific, North America, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and South America

Companies

Veolia (France), AECOM (US), WSP (Canada), Clean Earth (US), Wood (UK), Xylem (US), Jacobs (US), TRC Companies, Inc. (US), Battelle Memorial Institute (US), Cyclopure, Inc. (US)

This report categorizes the global PFAS filtration market based on Technology, Place of Treatment, End-use Industry , Remediation Technology, Environmental Medium, Containment Type, Service Type and Region

Based on the Technology:
  • Water Treatment System
  • Water Treatment Chemicals and other solutions
Based on the Place of Treatment:
  • In-situ
  • Ex-situ
Based on the Remediation Technology:
  • Membranes
  • Chemicals
Based on the Environmental Medium:
  • Groundwater Remediation
  • Soil Remediation
  • Surface Water and Sediment Remediation
Based on the Contaminant Type:
  • PFOA (Perfluorooctanoic Acid) and PFOS (Perfluorooctanesulfonic Acid)
  • Multiple PFAS Compounds
Based on the Service Type:
  • On-site
  • Off-site
Based on the End-use Industry:
  • Industrial
  • Commercial
  • Municipal
Based on the Region:
  • Asia Pacific
  • Europe
  • North America
  • South America
  • Middle East & Africa

Recent Developments

  • In April 2023, AECOM has announced a joint venture with Brwon and Caldwell. This move will support a landmark program to create a new -high quality, climate-resilient water supply for up to 15 million people.
  • In December 2022, WSP announced the acquisition of the Environment & Infrastructure business of John Wood. With this, WSP expanded its environmental leadership. This move will also enable the company to further seize opportunities in the fast-growing environmental and water sectors.
  • In March 2022, Veolia North America, a subsidiary of Veolia group acquired Suez. These acquisitions strengthen its position in North America to transform the delivery of environmental services. This combination will bring innovation and enhanced resources to support the US water sector.
  • In Feb 2019, Veolia Water Technologies announced a partnership with the European Membrane Institute, a laboratory with an international reference in the field of membrane materials and processes. This partnership includes reciprocal exchanges between researchers and the creation of platforms for testing industrial prototypes and characterization.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ):

To speak to our analyst for a discussion on the above findings, click Speak to Analyst

TABLE OF CONTENTS 
 
1 Introduction 
    1.1 Objective of the study 
    1.2 Market Definition 
    1.3 Market Scope 
           1.3.1 Years considered for the study.
           1.3.2 Regions covered.
    1.4 Currency 
    1.5 Unit Considered 
    1.6 Stakeholders 
           1.6.1 Impact of Recession
 
2 Research Methodology 
    2.1 Research Data 
           2.1.1 Secondary Data
                    2.1.1.1 Key data from secondary sources
           2.1.2 Primary Data
                    2.1.2.1 Key data from primary sources
                    2.1.2.2 Breakdown of Primary Interviews
    2.2 Market Size Estimation 
           2.2.1 Bottom-Up Approach
           2.2.2 Top-Down Approach
    2.3 Data Triangulation 
    2.4 Growth Rate Assumption/ Growth Forecast 
           2.4.1 Supply Side
           2.4.2 Demand Side
    2.5 Factor Analysis 
    2.6 Assumptions 
    2.7 Limitations 
    2.8 Risk Assessment 
    2.9 Impact of Recession 
 
3 Executive Summary 
 
4 Premium Insights 
    4.1 Opportunities in PFAS Filtration Market 
    4.2 PFAS Filtration Market, By Technology 
    4.3 PFAS Filtration Market, By Place of Treatment 
    4.4 PFAS Filtration Market, By Remediation Technology 
    4.5 PFAS Filtration Market, By Environmental Medium 
    4.6 PFAS Filtration Market, By Contaminant Type 
    4.7 PFAS Filtration Market, By Service Type 
    4.8 PFAS Filtration Market, By End-Use Industry  
    4.9 PFAS Filtration Market, By Region 
 
5 Market Overview 
    5.1 Introduction 
    5.2 Market Dynamics 
           5.2.1 Drivers
           5.2.2 Restraints 
           5.2.3 Opportunities
           5.2.4 Challenges
    5.3 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis 
           5.3.1 Threat of New Entrants
           5.3.2 Threat of Substitutes
           5.3.3 Bargaining Power of Buyers
           5.3.4 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
           5.3.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry
    5.4 Macroeconomic Indicators 
 
6 Industry Trends 
    6.1 Key Stakeholders and Buying Criteria 
           6.1.1 Key Stakeholders in Buying Process
           6.1.2 Buying Criteria
    6.2 Supply Chain Analysis 
           6.2.1 Raw Material
           6.2.2 Manufacturer
           6.2.3 Distribution
           6.2.4 End-User
    6.3  Ecosystem Analysis / Market Map 
    6.4 Case Studies 
    6.5  Regulatory Landscape 
           6.5.1 Regulatory Bodies, Government Agencies & Other Organizations
    6.6 Technology Analysis 
           6.6.1 Key Technologies
                    6.6.1.1 Advanced Oxidation Process
           6.6.2 Complementary Technologies
                    6.6.2.1 Granular Activated Carbon Filtration
 
    6.7 Trends Disruptions Impacting Customer’s Business 
    6.8 Trade Analysis 
           6.8.1 Import Data
           6.8.2 Export Data
    6.9 Key Conferences & Events In 2024-2025 
    6.10 Pricing Analysis 
           6.10.1 Average Selling Price Trend, By Region
           6.10.2 Average Selling Price Trend of Key Players, by End-Use Industry
    6.11 Investment and Funding Scenario 
    6.12 Patent Analysis 
           6.12.1 Approach
           6.12.2 Document Type
           6.12.3 Legal Status of the Patents
           6.12.4 Jurisdiction Analysis
           6.12.5 Top Applicants
 
7 PFAS Filtration Market, By Technology 
    7.1 Introduction 
    7.2 Water Treatment Systems 
    7.3 Water Treatment Chemicals and Other Solutions 
 
8 PFAS Filtration Market, By Place of Treatment 
    8.1 Introduction 
    8.2 In-situ 
    8.3 Ex-situ 
 
9 PFAS Filtration Market, By Remediation Technology 
    9.1 Introduction 
    9.2 Membranes 
           9.2.1 RO Membranes
    9.3 Chemicals 
           9.3.1 Activated Carbon Adsorption
           9.3.2 Chemical Oxidation
           9.3.3 Ion Exchange
           9.3.4 Bioremediation
           9.3.5 Others
 
10 PFAS Filtration Market, By Environmental Medium 
     10.1 Introduction 
     10.2 Groundwater Remediation 
     10.3 Soil Remediation 
     10.4 Surface Water and Sediment Remediation 
 
11 PFAS Filtration Market, By Contaminant Type 
     11.1 Introduction 
     11.2 PFOA and PFOS  
     11.3 Multiple PFAS Compounds 
 
12 PFAS Filtration Market, By Service Type 
     12.1 Introduction 
     12.2 On-site 
     12.3 Off-site 
 
13 PFAS Filtration Market, By End-Use Industry 
     13.1 Introduction 
     13.2 Industrial 
             13.2.1 Oil & Gas
             13.2.2 Pharmaceutical
             13.2.3 Chemical Manufacturing
             13.2.4 Mining & Mineral Processing
             13.2.5 Others
     13.3 Commercial 
     13.4 Municipal 
             13.4.1 Drinking Water Treatment
             13.4.2 Waste Water Treatment
 
14 PFAS Filtration Market, By Region 
     14.1 Introduction 
     14.2 North America 
             14.2.1 Impact of Recession on North America
             14.2.2 US
             14.2.3 Canada
             14.2.4 Mexico
     14.3 Asia Pacific 
             14.3.1 Impact of Recession on Asia Pacific
             14.3.2 China
             14.3.3 Japan
             14.3.4 India
             14.3.5 South Korea
             14.3.6 Indonesia
             14.3.7 Rest of Asia Pacific
     14.4 Europe  
             14.4.1 Impact of Recession on Europe
             14.4.2 Germany
             14.4.3 France
             14.4.4 UK
             14.4.5 Italy
             14.4.6 Russia
             14.4.7 Spain
             14.4.8 Rest of Europe
     14.5 Middle East & Africa  
             14.5.1 Impact of Recession on Middle East & Africa
             14.5.2 GCC
                        14.5.2.1 Saudi Arabia
                        14.5.2.2 UAE
                        14.5.2.3 Qatar
                        14.5.2.4 Rest of GCC
             14.5.3 South Africa
             14.5.4 Rest of Middle East & Africa
     14.6 South America 
             14.6.1 Impact of Recession on South America
             14.6.2 Brazil
             14.6.3 Argentina
             14.6.4 Rest of South America
 
15 Competitive Landscape 
     15.1 Introduction 
     15.2 Key Players' Strategies 
     15.3 Market Share Analysis 
             15.3.1 Ranking of Key Market Players, 2023
     15.4 Revenue Analysis (2019-2023) 
     15.5 Company Valuation and Financial Metrics 
     15.6 Brand/Product Comparison 
     15.7 Company Evaluation Matrix: Key Players, 2023 
             15.7.1 Stars
             15.7.2 Emerging Leaders 
             15.7.3 Pervasive Players
             15.7.4 Participants
             15.7.5 Company Footprint: Key Players, 2023
                        15.7.5.1 Company Footprint
                        15.7.5.2 Region Footprint
                        15.7.5.3 Technology Footprint
                        15.7.5.4 End-Use Industry Footprint
                        15.7.5.5 Service Type Footprint
     15.8 Company Evaluation Matrix: Startups/SMEs, 2023  
             15.8.1 Progressive Companies
             15.8.2 Responsive Companies
             15.8.3 Dynamic Companies
             15.8.4 Starting Blocks
             15.8.5 Competitive Benchmarking: Startups/SMEs, 2023
                        15.8.5.1 Detailed List of Key Start-ups/SMEs
                        15.8.5.2 Competitive Benchmarking of Key Start-ups/SMEs 
     15.9 Competitive Situation & Trends 
             15.9.1 New Product Launches
             15.9.2 Deals
             15.9.3 Expansions
 
16 Company Profile 
     16.1 Key Players 
             16.1.1 Veolia
                        16.1.1.1 Business Overview
                        16.1.1.2 Products Offered
                        16.1.1.3 Recent Development
                        16.1.1.4 MnM View
             16.1.2 Jacobs Engineering Group
             16.1.3 AECOM
             16.1.4 WSP
             16.1.5 Terracon
             16.1.6 Clean Earth
             16.1.7 Wood Group
             16.1.8 ExxonMobil
             16.1.9 Xylem, Inc.
             16.1.10 PerkinElmer
             16.1.11 GZA Geo Environmental, Inc.
     16.2 Startups/SMEs Players 
 
17 Appendix 
     17.1 Discussion Guide 
     17.2 Related Reports 

The study involved four major activities in estimating the market size of the PFAS filtration market. Exhaustive secondary research was done to collect information on the market, the peer market, and the grandparent market. The next step was to validate these findings, assumptions, and sizing with industry experts across the value chain through primary research. Both top-down and bottom-up approaches were employed to estimate the complete market size. Thereafter, the market breakdown and data triangulation procedures were used to estimate the market size of the segments and subsegments.

Secondary Research

In the secondary research process, various secondary sources have been referred to for identifying and collecting information for this study. These secondary sources include annual reports, press releases, investor presentations of companies, white papers, certified publications, trade directories, articles from recognized authors, gold standard and silver standard websites, and databases. Secondary research has been used to obtain key information about the value chain of the industry, monetary chain of the market, the total pool of key players, market classification and segmentation according to industry trends to the bottom-most level, and regional markets. It was also used to obtain information about the key developments from a market-oriented perspective.

Primary Research

The PFAS filtration market comprises several stakeholders in the value chain, which include manufacturers, and end users. Various primary sources from the supply and demand sides of the PFAS filtration market have been interviewed to obtain qualitative and quantitative information. The primary interviewees from the demand side include key opinion leaders in municipal sector. The primary sources from the supply side include manufacturers, associations, and institutions involved in the PFAS filtration industry. Primary interviews were conducted to gather insights such as market statistics, data of revenue collected from the products and services, market breakdowns, market size estimations, market forecasting, and data triangulation. Primary research also helped in understanding the various trends related to composition, processibility, application, end-use industry, and region. Stakeholders from the demand side, such as CIOs, CTOs, and CSOs were interviewed to understand the buyer’s perspective on the suppliers, products, component providers, and their current usage of PFAS filtration and outlook of their business, which will affect the overall market.

The breakdown of profiles of the primary interviewees is illustrated in the figure below:

PFAS Filtration Market Size, and Share

Note: Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3 companies are classified based on their market revenue in 2023 available in the public domain, product portfolios, and geographical presence.

Other designations include consultants and sales, marketing, and procurement managers.

To know about the assumptions considered for the study, download the pdf brochure

Market Size Estimation

The top-down and bottom-up approaches have been used to estimate and validate the size of the PFAS filtration market.

  • The key players in the industry have been identified through extensive secondary research.
  • The supply chain of the industry has been determined through primary and secondary research.
  • All percentage shares, splits, and breakdowns have been determined using secondary sources and verified through primary sources.
  • All possible parameters that affect the markets covered in this research study have been accounted for, viewed in extensive detail, verified through primary research, and analyzed to obtain the final quantitative and qualitative data.
  • The research includes the study of reports, reviews, and newsletters of the key market players, along with extensive interviews for opinions with leaders such as directors and marketing executives.

TOP - DOWN Approach-

PFAS Filtration Market Size, and Share

To know about the assumptions considered for the study, Request for Free Sample Report

BOTTOM - UP Approach-

PFAS Filtration Market Size, and Share

Data Triangulation

After arriving at the total market size from the estimation process, the overall market has been split into several segments and sub-segments. To complete the overall market engineering process and arrive at the exact statistics for all the segments and sub-segments, the data triangulation and market breakdown procedures have been employed, wherever applicable. The data has been triangulated by studying various factors and trends from both the demand and supply sides. Along with this, the market size has been validated by using both the top-down and bottom-up approaches and primary interviews. Hence, for every data segment, there have been three sources—top-down approach, bottom-up approach, and expert interviews. The data was assumed correct when the values arrived from the three sources matched.

Market Definition

PFAS filtrations are specifically designed to eliminate Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) from water sources. This market encompasses various filtration methods such as granular activated carbon (GAC), ion exchange, advanced oxidation processes (AOPs), and emerging technologies tailored for PFAS removal. It serves industrial, commercial, and municipal sectors worldwide, driven by stringent regulatory standards for clean water and increasing awareness of PFAS-related health and environmental risks.

Key Stakeholders

  • Senior Management
  • End User
  • Finance/Procurement Department
  • R&D Department
  • Manufacturers
  • Raw Material Suppliers

Report Objectives

  • To define, describe, and forecast the size of the PFAS filtration market, in terms of value .
  • To provide detailed information regarding the major factors (drivers, opportunities, restraints, and challenges) influencing the growth of the market
  • To estimate and forecast the market size based on technology, place of treatment, remediation technology, environmental medium, service type, environmental medium, end-use industry, and region.
  • To forecast the size of the market with respect to major regions, namely, Europe, North America, Asia Pacific, Middle East & Africa, and South America, along with their key countries
  • To strategically analyze micromarkets with respect to individual growth trends, prospects, and their contribution to the overall market
  • To analyze opportunities in the market for stakeholders and provide a competitive landscape of market leaders.
  • To track and analyze recent developments such as expansions, new product launches, partnerships & agreements, and acquisitions in the market.
  • To strategically profile key market players and comprehensively analyze their core competencies.

Available Customizations

Along with the given market data, MarketsandMarkets offers customizations according to the company’s specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Regional Analysis

  • Further breakdown of a region with respect to a particular country or additional application

Company Information

  • Detailed analysis and profiles of additional market players

Tariff & Regulations

  • Regulations and Impact on PFAS filtration market
Custom Market Research Services

We will customize the research for you, in case the report listed above does not meet with your exact requirements. Our custom research will comprehensively cover the business information you require to help you arrive at strategic and profitable business decisions.

Request Customization
Report Code
CH 9022
Published ON
May, 2024
Choose License Type
BUY NOW
  • SHARE
X
Request Customization
Speak to Analyst
Speak to Analyst
OR FACE-TO-FACE MEETING
PERSONALIZE THIS RESEARCH
  • Triangulate with your Own Data
  • Get Data as per your Format and Definition
  • Gain a Deeper Dive on a Specific Application, Geography, Customer or Competitor
  • Any level of Personalization
REQUEST A FREE CUSTOMIZATION
LET US HELP YOU!
  • What are the Known and Unknown Adjacencies Impacting the PFAS Filtration Market
  • What will your New Revenue Sources be?
  • Who will be your Top Customer; what will make them switch?
  • Defend your Market Share or Win Competitors
  • Get a Scorecard for Target Partners
CUSTOMIZED WORKSHOP REQUEST
  • Call Us
  • +1-888-600-6441 (Corporate office hours)
  • +1-888-600-6441 (US/Can toll free)
  • +44-800-368-9399 (UK office hours)
CONNECT WITH US
ABOUT TRUST ONLINE
©2024 MarketsandMarkets Research Private Ltd. All rights reserved
DMCA.com Protection Status Website Feedback