Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market by Type (Zinc, Iron, Manganese, Cobalt, Chromium, Copper), Livestock (Ruminants, Swine, Poultry, Aquaculture), Form (Dry, Liquid), Chelate Type, and Region - Global Forecast to 2022

The chelated feed trace minerals market was valued at USD 408.3 Million in 2016 and is projected to reach USD 570.8 Million by 2022, growing at a CAGR of 5.8 % from 2017, in terms of value. In terms of volume, the market is projected to reach 128.0 KT by 2022. The objectives of this study are to define, segment, and project the size of the chelated feed trace minerals based on type, livestock, chelate type, form, and key regions.

• To provide detailed information about the major factors influencing the growth of the market (drivers, restraints, opportunities, and industry-specific challenges)
• To analyze the opportunities in the market for stakeholders and provide details of the competitive landscape for market leaders
• To analyze the competitive environment of the chelated feed trace minerals market
• To provide the analysis of the research & development spending and funding activities in the chelated feed trace minerals market
• To project the size of the market, in terms of value (USD million) in the key regions, namely, North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, South America, and the Rest of the World (RoW)
• To strategically profile the key players and comprehensively analyze their core competencies
• To analyze the competitive developments mergers, acquisitions, agreements/joint ventures, expansions, and new product launches in the chelated feed trace minerals market

The years considered for the study are:

• Base year – 2016
• Estimated year– 2017
• Forecast period – 2017 to 2022

This report includes the estimation of market size for value (USD million), and volume (MT). Both, top-down and bottom-up approaches have been used to estimate and validate the size of the chelated feed trace minerals market and to estimate the size of various other dependent submarkets in the overall market. Key players in the market have been identified through secondary research (the FAO, Bloomberg Businessweek, Factiva, and companies’ annual reports), and their market share has been determined through primary and secondary research. All percentage shares, splits, and breakdowns have been determined using secondary sources and verified through primary sources.

To know about the assumptions considered for the study, download the pdf brochure

Market Ecosystem

The various contributors involved in the value chain of chelated feed trace minerals include manufacturers, suppliers, distributors, intermediaries, and customers, and agricultural product manufacturers such as Cargill (US), ADM (US), BASF (Germany), DSM (Netherlands), Nutreco (Netherlands), DLG Group (Denmark), InVivo (France), Bluestar Adisseo (China), Alltech (US), Phibro (US), Kemin (US), Zinpro (US), and Novus (US).

Target Audience

• Associations and industry bodies
• Commercial research & development (R&D) institutions
• Chelated feed trace minerals manufacturers and suppliers
• Raw material suppliers and distributors
• Traders, distributors, and retailers
• Agricultural institutes, associations, and government agencies
• Commercial growers
• Animal nutrition industry players
• Researchers
• Industry experts

Scope of the Report

The trace minerals (chelated) in feed market is segmented as follows:

On the basis of Type

• Zinc
• Iron
• Cobalt
• Chromium
• Copper
• Others (Selenium and iodine)

On the basis of Mode of Livestock

• Ruminants
  • Calf
  • Dairy
  • Beef
  • Others (Sheep and goats)
• Swine
  • Starter
  • Grower
  • Sow
• Poultry
  • Broilers
  • Layers
  • Turkey
  • Others (Breeders, duck, emu, and quail)
• Aquaculture
  • Mollusks
  • Fish
  • Crustaceans
• Others (equine and pets)

On the basis of Chelate Type

• Amino acids
• Proteinates
• Polysaccharide complexes
• Others (Propionates and peptides)

On the basis of Form

• Dry
• Liquid

On the basis of Region

• North America
• Europe
• Asia Pacific
• South America
• RoW (The Middle East and Africa)

Available Customizations

With the given market data, MarketsandMarkets offers customizations according to the client-specific needs.

The following customization options are available for the report:

Product Analysis

• Product matrix, which gives a detailed comparison of the product portfolio of each company

Application Analysis

• Application analysis, which gives a detailed analysis of other applications of trace minerals (chelated) in feed

Regional Analysis

• Further breakdown of the Rest of World trace minerals (chelated) in feed market into South American countries
• Further breakdown of the Rest of Asia Pacific trace minerals (chelated) in feed market into key contributing countries

Company Information

• Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five)

Table of Contents

1 Introduction (Page No. - 17)
    1.1 Objectives of the Study
    1.2 Market Definition
    1.3 Market Scope
    1.4 Periodization Considered
    1.5 Currency Considered
    1.6 Unit Considered
    1.7 Stakeholders

2 Research Methodology (Page No. - 22)
    2.1 Research Data
           2.1.1 Key Data From Secondary Sources
           2.1.2 Key Data From Primary Sources
                    2.1.2.1 Key Industry Insights
                    2.1.2.2 Breakdown of Primaries
    2.2 Market Size Estimation
    2.3 Market Breakdown & Data Triangulation
    2.4 Research Assumptions and Limitations
           2.4.1 Assumptions
           2.4.2 Limitations

3 Executive Summary (Page No. - 29)

4 Premium Insights (Page No. - 35)
    4.1 Opportunities for Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market
    4.2 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Type & Region
    4.3 Europe: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Livestock & Country
    4.4 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Livestock & Region
    4.5 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Form & Region
    4.6 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Chelate Type & Region, 2017 vs 2022

5 Market Overview (Page No. - 40)
    5.1 Introduction
    5.2 Macroindicators
           5.2.1 Growth in Livestock Production
           5.2.2 Growth in the Consumption of Animal-Based Products
                    5.2.2.1 Continuous Rise in Meat Consumption
           5.2.3 Shrinking Pasture Land Area
    5.3 Market Dynamics
           5.3.1 Drivers
                    5.3.1.1 Growth in Feed Production
                    5.3.1.2 Standardization of Meat Products
                    5.3.1.3 Growth in Organized Livestock Sector in Developing Countries
                    5.3.1.4 Increasing Awareness About Precision Nutrition Techniques
           5.3.2 Restraints
                    5.3.2.1 Fluctuating Raw Material Prices
           5.3.3 Opportunities
                    5.3.3.1 Shift Toward Natural Growth Promoters (NGP)
                    5.3.3.2 Growth in Demand From Developed Economies
                    5.3.3.3 Growth in Bioavailability of Trace Minerals
           5.3.4 Challenges
                    5.3.4.1 Lack of Awareness in Developing and Underdeveloped Countries
    5.4 Value Chain Analysis
    5.5 Supply Chain Analysis
    5.6 Regulatory Framework
           5.6.1 North America
                    5.6.1.1 US
                    5.6.1.2 Canada
           5.6.2 Europe
           5.6.3 Asia Pacific
                    5.6.3.1 Japan
                    5.6.3.2 China
           5.6.4 Rest of the World (RoW)
                    5.6.4.1 South Africa

6 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed, By Type (Page No. - 59)
    6.1 Introduction
    6.2 Zinc
    6.3 Copper
    6.4 Iron
    6.5 Manganese
    6.6 Cobalt
    6.7 Chromium
    6.8 Others

7 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Livestock (Page No. - 71)
    7.1 Introduction
    7.2 Ruminants
           7.2.1 Calf
           7.2.2 Dairy
           7.2.3 Beef
           7.2.4 Others
    7.3 Swine
           7.3.1 Starter
           7.3.2 Grower
           7.3.3 Sow
    7.4 Poultry
           7.4.1 Broilers
           7.4.2 Layers
           7.4.3 Turkey
           7.4.4 Others
    7.5 Aquaculture
           7.5.1 Fish
           7.5.2 Mollusks
           7.5.3 Crustaceans
    7.6 Others

8 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Chelate Type (Page No. - 85)
    8.1 Introduction
    8.2 Amino Acids
    8.3 Proteinates
    8.4 Polysaccharides
    8.5 Others

9 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Form (Page No. - 94)
    9.1 Introduction
    9.2 Dry
    9.3 Liquid

10 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market: By Region (Page No. - 99)
     10.1 Introduction
     10.2 North America
             10.2.1 US
             10.2.2 Canada
             10.2.3 Mexico
     10.3 Europe
             10.3.1 Spain
             10.3.2 Russia
             10.3.3 Germany
             10.3.4 France
             10.3.5 UK
             10.3.6 Rest of Europe
     10.4 Asia Pacific
             10.4.1 China
             10.4.2 India
             10.4.3 Japan
             10.4.4 Australia
             10.4.5 Rest of Asia Pacific
     10.5 South America
             10.5.1 Brazil
             10.5.2 Argentina
             10.5.3 Chile
             10.5.4 Rest of South America
     10.6 Rest of the World
             10.6.1 Africa
             10.6.2 The Middle East

11 Competitive Landscape (Page No. - 143)
     11.1 Overview
     11.2 Market Ranking, By Key Player
     11.3 Competitive Situation & Trends
             11.3.1 Acquisitions
             11.3.2 Expansions
             11.3.3 New Product Launches
             11.3.4 Joint Ventures

12 Company Profiles (Page No. - 147)
(Business Overview, Strength of Product Portfolio, Products Offered, Business Strategy Excellence & Recent Developments)*
     12.1 Cargill
     12.2 ADM
     12.3 BASF
     12.4 DSM
     12.5 Nutreco
     12.6 DLG Group
     12.7 Invivo
     12.8 Bluestar Adisseo
     12.9 Alltech
     12.10 Phibro
     12.11 Kemin
     12.12 Zinpro
     12.13 Novus

*Details on Business Overview, Strength of Product Portfolio, Products Offered, Business Strategy Excellence & Recent Developments Might Not Be Captured in Case of Unlisted Companies.

13 Appendix (Page No. - 186)
     13.1 Discussion Guide
     13.2 Other Developments
             13.2.1 Acquisitions, 2012–2017
             13.2.2 Expansions, 2012–2017
     13.3 Knowledge Store: Marketsandmarkets’ Subscription Portal
     13.4 Introducing RT: Real-Time Market Intelligence
     13.5 Available Customizations
     13.6 Related Reports
     13.7 Author Details

List of Tables (125 Tables)

Table 1 USD Exchange Rate, 2014-2016
Table 2 Per Capita Consumption of Meat, By Region
Table 3 Consumption of Meat & Milk in Developing & Developed Countries, 1964–2030
Table 4 List of International Inventories
Table 5 Mineral Salts and Their Listing on Various Inventory Lists
Table 6 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Type, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 7 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Type, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 8 Zinc Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Region, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 9 Zinc Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Region, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 10 Copper Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Region, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 11 Copper Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Region, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 12 Iron Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Region, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 13 Iron Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Region, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 14 Manganese Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Region, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 15 Manganese Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Region, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 16 Cobalt Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Region, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 17 Cobalt Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Region, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 18 Chromium Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Region, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 19 Chromium Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Region, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 20 Other Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Region, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 21 Other Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Region, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 22 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Livestock, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 23 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Livestock, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 24 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Ruminant Feed Market, By Region, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 25 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Ruminant Feed Market, By Region, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 26 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Ruminant Type, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 27 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Swine Feed Market, By Region, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 28 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Swine Feed Market, By Region, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 29 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Swine Type, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 30 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Poultry Feed Market, By Region, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 31 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Poultry Feed Market, By Region, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 32 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Poultry Type, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 33 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Aquafeed Market, By Region, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 34 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Aquafeed Market, By Region, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 35 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Aquaculture Type, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 36 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Region, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 37 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Other Market Size, By Region, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 38 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Chelate Type, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 39 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Chelate Type, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 40 Amino Acids: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Region, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 41 Amino Acids: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Region, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 42 Proteinates: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Region, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 43 Proteinates: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Region, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 44 Polysaccharides: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Region, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 45 Polysaccharides: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Region, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 46 Other Chelate Types: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Region, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 47 Other Chelate Types: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Region, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 48 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Form, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 49 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Form, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 50 Dry Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Region, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 51 Dry Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Region, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 52 Liquid Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Region, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 53 Liquid Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Region, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 54 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Region, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 55 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Region, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 56 North America: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Country, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 57 North America: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Type, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 58 North America: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Type, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 59 North America: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Livestock, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 60 North America: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Livestock, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 61 North America: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Form, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 62 North America: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Form, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 63 North America: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Chelate Type, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 64 North America: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Chelate Type, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 65 US: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Livestock, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 66 Canada: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Livestock, 2015–2022 (’000 USD)
Table 67 Mexico: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Livestock, 2015–2022 (’000 USD)
Table 68 Europe: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Size, By Country, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 69 Europe: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Type, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 70 Europe: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Type, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 71 Europe: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Livestock, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 72 Europe: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Livestock, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 73 Europe: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Form, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 74 Europe: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Form, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 75 Europe: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Chelate Type, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 76 Europe: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Chelate Type, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 77 Spain: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Livestock, 2015–2022 (’000 USD)
Table 78 Russia: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Livestock, 2015–2022 (’000 USD)
Table 79 Germany: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Livestock, 2015–2022 (’000 USD)
Table 80 France: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Livestock, 2015–2022 (’000 USD)
Table 81 UK: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Livestock, 2015–2022 (’000 USD)
Table 82 Rest of Europe: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Livestock, 2015–2022 (’000 USD)
Table 83 Asia Pacific: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Country, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 84 Asia Pacific: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Type, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 85 Asia Pacific: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Type, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 86 Asia Pacific: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Livestock, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 87 Asia Pacific: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Livestock, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 88 Asia Pacific: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Form, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 89 Asia Pacific: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Form, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 90 Asia Pacific: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Chelate Type, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 91 Asia Pacific: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Chelate Type, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 92 China: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Livestock, 2015–2022 (’000 USD)
Table 93 India: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Livestock, 2015–2022 (’000 USD)
Table 94 Japan: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Livestock, 2015–2022 (’000 USD)
Table 95 Australia: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Livestock, 2015–2022 (’000 USD)
Table 96 Rest of Asia Pacific: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Livestock, 2015–2022 (’000 USD)
Table 97 South America: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Country, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 98 South America: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Type, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 99 South America: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Type, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 100 South America: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Livestock, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 101 South America: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Livestock, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 102 South America: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Form, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 103 South America: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Form, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 104 South America: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Chelate Type, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 105 South America: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Chelate Type, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 106 Brazil: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Livestock, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 107 Argentina: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Livestock, 2015–2022 (’000 USD)
Table 108 Chile: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Livestock, 2015–2022 (’000 USD)
Table 109 Rest of South America: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Livestock, 2015–2022 (’000 USD)
Table 110 Rest of the World: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Country, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 111 Rest of the World: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Type, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 112 Rest of the World: Market for Chelated Feed Trace Minerals Size, By Type, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 113 Rest of the World: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Livestock, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 114 Rest of the World: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Livestock, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 115 Rest of the World: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Form, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 116 Rest of the World: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Form, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 117 Rest of the World: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Chelate Type, 2015–2022 (USD Million)
Table 118 Rest of the World: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Chelate Type, 2015–2022 (MT)
Table 119 Africa: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Livestock, 2015–2022 (’000 USD)
Table 120 The Middle East: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Livestock, 2015–2022 (’000 USD)
Table 121 Top Five Companies in the Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, 2016
Table 122 Acquisitions, 2012–2017
Table 123 Expansions, 2012–2017
Table 124 New Product Launches, 2012–2017
Table 125 Joint Ventures, 2012–2017

List of Figures (50 Figures)

Figure 1 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market Segmentation
Figure 2 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market Segmentation, By Livestock
Figure 3 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market Segmentation, By Region
Figure 4 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market: Research Design
Figure 5 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market Estimation Methodology: Bottom-Up Approach
Figure 6 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market Estimation Methodology: Top-Down Approach
Figure 7 Data Triangulation Methodology
Figure 8 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Type, 2017 vs 2022 (USD Million)
Figure 9 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Livestock, 2017 vs 2022 (USD Million)
Figure 10 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Form, 2017 vs 2022 (USD Million)
Figure 11 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Chelate Type, 2017 vs 2022 (USD Million)
Figure 12 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Region
Figure 13 Growth in Consumption of Animal-Based Products is Expected to Drive the Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market
Figure 14 Zinc Segment Recorded the Largest Share Across All Regions in 2016
Figure 15 Swine Segment Accounted for the Largest Share in Europe in 2016
Figure 16 Poultry Segment Recorded the Largest Share Across All Regions Except Europe in 2016 (USD Million)
Figure 17 Dry Segment is Estimated to Account for the Larger Share Across All Regions in 2016
Figure 18 Amino Acid Segment is Projected to Domiante the Market Throughout the Forecast Year
Figure 19 Global Livestock Production Index (2000–2013)
Figure 20 Global Livestock Population, 2010 vs 2014 (Million)
Figure 21 Global Animal-Based Product Consumption, By Commodity, 1967–2030 (Million Ton)
Figure 22 Global Permanent Meadows & Pasture Land Area, 1991–2014 (Million Hectare)
Figure 23 Global Meadows & Permanent Pastures Land Area, Decadal Average 1965–2014 (Million Hectare)
Figure 24 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market: Drivers, Restraints, Opportunities, and Challenges
Figure 25 Global Feed Production Trend, 2011–2016 (Million Ton)
Figure 26 Regional Feed Production Status, 2016 (Million Ton)
Figure 27 Leading Feed Producers, 2016 (Million Ton)
Figure 28 Fluctuating Price of Zinc and Copper (USD/MT)
Figure 29 Value Chain Analysis: Major Value is Added During the Manufacturing Phase
Figure 30 Supply Chain Analysis
Figure 31 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Livestock, 2017 vs 2022 (USD Million)
Figure 32 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Ruminant Feed Market, By Region, 2017 vs 2022 (USD Million)
Figure 33 Amino Acids Segment is Projected to Be the Largest Between 2017 & 2022 (USD Million)
Figure 34 Europe is Expected to Be the Largest Region, in Terms of Value, Throughout the Forecast Period
Figure 35 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Form, 2017–2022 (USD Million)
Figure 36 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market, By Form, 2017 vs 2022 (USD Million)
Figure 37 Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market Geographic Snapshot (2017–2022): UK and US Projected are Emerging as New Hotspots
Figure 38 North America: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market Snapshot
Figure 39 Europe: Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market Snapshot
Figure 40 Developments in the Trace Minerals (Chelated) in Feed Market Between 2012 and 2017
Figure 41 Acquisitions: the Key Strategy, 2012–2017
Figure 42 Cargill: Company Snapshot
Figure 43 ADM: Company Snapshot
Figure 44 BASF: Company Snapshot
Figure 45 DSM: Company Snapshot
Figure 46 Nutreco: Company Snapshot
Figure 47 DLG Group: Company Snapshot
Figure 48 Invivo: Company Snapshot
Figure 49 Bluestar Adisseo: Company Snapshot
Figure 50 Phibro: Company Snapshot

The chelated feed trace minerals market is estimated at USD 431.2 Million in 2017 and is projected to reach USD 570.8 Million by 2022, at a CAGR of 5.8 % from 2017. In terms of volume, the market is projected to reach 128.0 KT by 2022. Chelated trace minerals play an important role in the growth and performance of the animals. Chelated trace minerals are required in small quantities but have a significant impact on the performance of the livestock. This increasing awareness about the benefits of chelated trace minerals among growers increases their usage in animal nutrition, particularly in the developed countries. The shift in dietary preferences towards a protein-rich diet, owing to health awareness and a rise in income levels among the population, drive the consumption of meat and other animal-based products. This has resulted in an increased demand for animal-based products, subsequently driving the production of livestock, which in turn, is fed using novel methods and products, ensuring an optimum nutrition level and feed conversion ratio. These factors are expected to boost the demand for chelated feed trace minerals. Increasing awareness about the precision nutrition techniques and the growth of the organized livestock sector in developing countries are other factors driving the growth of this market.

On the basis of type, the zinc segment is projected to be the fastest-growing during the forecast period. The poultry segment is estimated to dominate the chelated feed trace minerals market on the basis of livestock through the forecast period. By form, the dry segment dominated the market in 2016. On the basis of chelate type, the amino acids segment accounted for the largest share of the chelated feed trace minerals market in 2016.

The zinc segment dominated the chelated feed trace minerals market in 2016, globally, followed by copper. Zinc and copper are known as gut conditioners. Zinc is important for protein, carbohydrate, and lipid metabolism and enzyme synthesis. Increasing bioavailability and absorption of zinc due to chelation has increased the demand for chelated zinc.  Furthermore, several key players are engaged in the production of agricultural zinc chelated, which also drives its growth in the global market. Zinc is required in small but critical concentrations to allow physiological pathways of animals to function normally. Zinc deficiency is the most common problem witnessed around the globe, especially in pets, which helps drive the market for zinc chelated trace minerals. The European region accounted for the largest market share for the zinc segment in 2016, and this trend is expected to continue over the next five years.

The European region dominated the chelated feed trace minerals market and is projected to grow at a significant rate from 2017 to 2022, both in terms of value and volume. The UK is projected to be the fastest-growing market in the region. The UK is one of the most advanced and highly regulated feed markets in the European region. It follows many regulations established by the EU and other domestic regulatory agencies such as the Food Standards Agency and Agricultural Industries Confederation. The UK has around 200,000 animal feed industries, which are involved in importing, manufacturing, handling, storing, and distributing animal feed. There has been an increasing demand for meat and dairy products in the country. The consumers demand better quality animal products and milk. This requires superior feeding practices to the livestock to improve the quality of the animal products. Such factors have encouraged manufacturers to produce more nutritious animal feed products, which in turn drive the demand for chelated trace minerals in animal nutrition. Fluctuating raw material prices in the recent past is a major factor restraining the growth of this market.

The chelated feed trace minerals market is concentrated, with leading companies driving the market growth. The report provides qualitative analysis of the prominent market players and their preferred development strategies. Key players such Cargill (US), ADM (US), BASF (Germany), DSM (Netherlands), Nutreco (Netherlands), DLG Group (Denmark), InVivo (France), Bluestar Adisseo (China), Alltech (US), Phibro (US), Kemin (US), Zinpro (US), and Novus (US) have been profiled in the report. These leading players have adopted various strategies such as acquisitions, joint ventures, expansions, and new product launches to explore new and untapped markets, expanding in local areas of emerging markets, and developing a new customer base for long-term client relationships. This has not only enabled the key players to expand their geographical reach but has also reinforced their market position by gaining a larger share in terms of revenue and product portfolios.

Small-scale players have also adopted these strategies to expand their businesses globally by investing in the establishment of manufacturing facilities and technical service centers in various regions. This inorganic growth strategy enables them to improve their technical expertise through intensive R&D infrastructure offered by bigger players.

To speak to our analyst for a discussion on the above findings, click Speak to Analyst