Top Trends in the Agricultural Biologicals Market

Top Trends in the Agricultural Biologicals Market by Agricultural Biologicals, Biocontrols, Bio fungicides, Bioinsecticides, Bio nematicides, Biostimulants, Biofertilizers, Inoculants, Pheromones, Biological Seed Treatment - Global Forecast to 2026

Report Code: AGI 4970 Dec, 2021, by marketsandmarkets.com

[247 Pages Report] The global agricultural biologicals market is projected to grow at a CAGR of 11.9% from an estimated value of USD 10.6 billion in 2021 to reach USD 18.5 billion by 2026. Awareness of organic food products and concerns toward environmental safety and favorable regulations are the key drivers affecting the growth of the agricultural biologicals market. The role of agricultural biological products has become a integral part of integrated pest management practices (IPM) in developed markets, wherein the biological products are used in combination with new synthetic crop chemistries. Strategic developments such as expansions, new product launches, and agreements have been adopted by the majority of key players to strengthen the market.

Top Trends in the Agricultural Biologicals Market

To know about the assumptions considered for the study, Request for Free Sample Report

COVID-19 Impact on the Global Agricultural Biologicals  Market

Amid the spread of Covid-19 pandemic the consumption pattern of consumers showed a responsible shift from non-organic to organic, which is happening today. An emerging focus on preventive healthcare is gradually but systematically bringing about a shift in the global conventional farming practices and producers are encouraged to produced more using sustainable methods and resources. This is in turn driving the market for agricultural biologicals globally. In the manufacturing sector the pandemic has sped up the shift from global to more local economies. As part of this transformation, industries are looking to bring supply chains closer to home and are creating major “reshoring” opportunities. Amid this, raw material manufacturers for agricultural biologicals also faced disruptions in supply and difficulty in maintain operational continuity. However, agriculture sector was highly supported globally by the governments and there were tremendous efforts being taken to manage the streamlining of their operations as normal to maintain productivity.

Market Dynamics

Drivers:Regulatory pressures and harmful effects associated with synthetic plant protection products

Plant Protection Products (PPP) such as herbicides, fungicides, and insecticides are considered to be harmful to human health and the environment. As a consequence of the introduction of safety regulations, various products were withdrawn from the market either because they were banned or because their reinstatement in the market was not supported during the re-registration process. For instance, synthetic plant protection products, such as Dinoseb, Chloramben, Methyl parathion, and Toxaphene, were banned in the US. Similarly, in the European Union, the stringent regulatory requirements and complex technical guidance procedures for the assessment of risks have reduced the number of active substances being registered in the EU. Several countries in the European region banned neonicotinoid pesticides between 2013 and 2015, which has encouraged the adoption of agricultural biologicals.

Restraints: Short shelf-life of biopesticides

The shelf life of biopesticides is evaluated by the number of viable spores or mycelia formulation. The quality of biopesticides is determined by the number of colony-forming units per gram (cfu/g). Biopesticides are easily affected by various biotic and abiotic factors in farm fields because they are naturally occurring organisms or substances. This directly affects their efficacy in the field, which can become low or inactive. In addition, biopesticides have a very short shelf life compared to conventional pesticides, which leads to a problem in their storage and protection. Microbial biopesticides have a longer shelf life and can be stored for a long time; however, this cannot be compared to the longer shelf life of chemical pesticides. This limited shelf life is proving to be a restraint for the market. The shelf life of biopesticides may be increased with the use of refrigeration to extend the products’ shelf life. However, the compatibility and high costs of products may render it an expensive and perishable commodity to traders. Microbial biopesticides can be stored for extended periods through freezing, refrigerated culture broth, or any appropriate buffer. However, for storage in cultured broth, the long-term cell viability would depend on the type of microorganism used. For biochemical biopesticides, the use of freezing and refrigeration holds minimal prospects, as the ingredients and composition may lose their efficacy when frozen.

Opportunuity:Advancements in microbial research across the globe

Companies such as Bayer CropScience (Germany) are focusing on developing advanced microbials and RNA interference (RNAi) technology solutions, which help farmers to opt for better alternatives for the application of agricultural biologicals. Extensive research undertaken by these major players in the crop protection industry has encouraged the effective use of biological signals to trigger RNAi for specific genes, which help in disease and pest resistance and increased yield and quality. Companies are focusing on the creation of sprayable RNAi products for biological crop protection. Before the acquisition of Monsanto by Bayer, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 2017 approved Monsanto’s genetic engineering technology using RNA interference for killing insects and pests. Corteva Agriscience, the newly found agricultural division of DowDuPont, also licensed two insect traits from Monsanto, which contained RNAi rootworm trait. This technology is witnessing increased adoption in the industry, as it is a novel solution available for rootworm traits.

Challenges: High preference for agrochemicals among farmers

There are various advantages of adopting agricultural biologicals. Biologicals do not pose a risk to the other organisms that are beneficial to the growth of the crop, but only target specific pests and related species. It also does not harm the farmers and offers the benefits of short, restricted field entry intervals, due to which farmers can access the fields frequently. However, there are certain barriers to the adoption of biologicals. For instance, conventional pesticide and fertilizer markets are well-established and offer various products. Farmers are unwilling to adopt biologicals, as they are accustomed to the use of conventional pesticides and fertilizers due to the perception of higher yield. In addition, farmers have a perception that biologicals are costlier than conventional products, which also poses a challenge to the adoption of biologicals.

By trends, the biocontrols segment is projected to dominate the agricultural biologicals market during the forecast period.

Biocontrols are expected to be a substitute for conventional chemicals due to the increasing regulations on chemical usage and maximum residue levels (MRLs). The pesticides market is expected to decline, owing to their detrimental effect on the living organisms. Biocontrols not only kills the target pests but also aids in minimizing the number of sprays. The ban on the usage of key pesticides will also drive the market for biocontrols market across the regions.

By trends, the bionematicides segment is projected to be the fastest-growing segment in the agricultural biologicals market during the forecast period.

There has been an increase in the loss of agricultural crops due to root-knot nematodes, globally, every year. Currently, the market for bionematicides is not majorly commercialized, but in the coming years, it poses a great scope. The increasing concerns towards preventing the loss caused by soil-borne insects is fueling the growth of the bionematicides market.

By trends, the bioinsecticides segment is projected to be the second-fastest growing segment in the agricultural biologicals market during the forecast period.

With the increasing climatic stress, there has been an emergence of various insects, hampering the growth of the plants, thus resulting in production losses. The application of bioinsecticides can be more beneficial in terms of sustainability and cost-effectiveness as compared to conventional chemicals. Also, the need to prevent crop losses and to adopt sustainability is driving the market for bioinsecticides.

The increasing demand for biocontrols in the North American region is projected to drive the growth of the agricultural biologicals market.

The North American region accounted for the largest share of the market in 2021. Growth in the organics industry, rise in the cost of chemical fertilizers, and increasing awareness for the preservation of soil nutrients are the major driving factors of this market. Growth in the North American region can be attributed to its high-end R&D infrastructure and the high number of patents received for biocontrol and biostimulants by various key companies in the region.

Key Market Players

Key players in the agricultural biologicals market include BASF SE (Germany), Syngenta AG (Switzerland), Marrone Bio Innovations (US), Isagro S.p.A. (Italy), UPL (India), Evogene Ltd (Israel), Bayer AG (Germany), and Vegalab S.A. (US).

Get online access to the report on the World's First Market Intelligence Cloud

  • Easy to Download Historical Data & Forecast Numbers
  • Company Analysis Dashboard for high growth potential opportunities
  • Research Analyst Access for customization & queries
  • Competitor Analysis with Interactive dashboard
  • Latest News, Updates & Trend analysis
Request Sample

Scope of the Report

Report Metric

Details

Market size available for years

2018-2026

Base year considered

2020

Forecast period

2021-2026

Forecast units

Value (USD million)

Segments covered

Agricultural Biologicals, Biocontrols, Bioinsecticides, Biofungicides, Biostimulants, Biofertilizers, Bionematicides, Biological Seed Treatment, Agricultural Inoculants, Agricultural Pheromones

Geographies covered

North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, South America, and Rest of World (RoW)

Key Companies covered

BASF SE (Germany), Bayer AG (Germany), Syngenta AG (Switzerland), Marrione Bio Innovation (US), Isagro S.p.A. (Italy), UPL (India), Evogene Ltd (Israel), Vegalab S.A. (US), Valent Biosciences (US), Stockton Bio-Ag (Israel), Biolchim SPA  (Italy), Rizobacter (Argentina), Valagro SPA (Italy), Koppert Biological Systems (Netherlands), Lallemand Inc. (Canada), Haifa group (Israel), and Seipasa (Spain)

This research report provides the top trends in agricultural biologicals market such as:

  • Agricultural biologicals
  • Biocontrols
  • Biostimulants
  • Biofertilizers
  • Biofungicides
  • Bioinsecticides
  • Bionematicides
  • Agricultural Inoculants
  • Pheromones
  • Biological Seed Treatment

Recent Developments:

  • In July 2021, Marrone Bio Innovations and Rhizobacter expand strategic alliance to supply novel seed treatment in Brazil. Rizonema, a biological seed treatment for nematodes and soil-dwelling insects, will be offered for use in row crops in Brazil through an expanded distribution agreement.
  • In May 2021, Seipasa reinforced its product catalog in Colombia with the new registrations of phytosanitary products including Pirecris and Seican. Pirecris and Seican are bioinsecticides that have a powerful shock effect for the control of pests, such as whiteflies, thrips, aphids, and Cicadellidae.
  • In September 2021, Lavie Bio, a subsidiary of Evogene Ltd., and United Agronomy announced the signing of a distribution agreement for the inoculant products of Lavie Bio.
  • In May 2021, Corteva Agriscience signed an exclusive commercialization, supply, and distribution agreement with Eden Research plc. (U.K.) for Eden’s first seed treatment product.
  • In April 2021, FMC Corporation entered a distribution agreement with Syngenta Crop Protection to commercialize biological seed treatment innovation in Canada.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ):

To speak to our analyst for a discussion on the above findings, click Speak to Analyst

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION (Page No. - 18)
    1.1 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
    1.2 MARKET DEFINITION
    1.3 PERIODIZATION CONSIDERED
    1.4 CURRENCY CONSIDERED
           TABLE 1 USD EXCHANGE RATE, 2015–2020
    1.5 STAKEHOLDERS

2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (Page No. - 21)
    2.1 RESEARCH DATA
           FIGURE 1 RESEARCH DESIGN: TOP 10 TRENDS IN THE AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICALS MARKET
           2.1.1 SECONDARY DATA
                    2.1.1.1 Key data from secondary sources
           2.1.2 PRIMARY DATA
                    2.1.2.1 Key data from primary sources
                    2.1.2.2 Breakdown of Primaries
    2.2 MARKET SIZE ESTIMATION
           2.2.1 BOTTOM-UP APPROACH
                    FIGURE 2 MARKET SIZE ESTIMATION METHODOLOGY: BOTTOM-UP APPROACH
           2.2.2 TOP-DOWN APPROACH
                    FIGURE 3 MARKET SIZE ESTIMATION METHODOLOGY: TOP-DOWN APPROACH
    2.3 MARKET BREAKDOWN & DATA TRIANGULATION
           FIGURE 4 DATA TRIANGULATION METHODOLOGY
    2.4 RESEARCH ASSUMPTIONS & LIMITATIONS
           2.4.1 ASSUMPTIONS
           2.4.2 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY

3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (Page No. - 30)
    FIGURE 5 GLOBAL AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICALS MARKET SIZE, 2019–2026 (USD MILLION)
    FIGURE 6 INCREASING DEMAND FOR BIOCONTROLS TO DRIVE THE GROWTH OF THE AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICALS MARKET IN 2021
    FIGURE 7 AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICALS MARKET SNAPSHOT: NORTH AMERICA ACCOUNTED FOR THE LARGEST SHARE IN 2020

4 PREMIUM INSIGHTS (Page No. - 33)
    4.1 OPPORTUNITIES IN THE AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICALS MARKET
           FIGURE 8 SHIFT TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE IS DRIVING THE GROWTH OF THE MARKET
    4.2 AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICALS MARKET, BY TYPE
           FIGURE 9 BIOCONTROLS WAS THE LARGEST SEGMENT OF THE AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICALS MARKET IN 2020
    4.3 NORTH AMERICA: AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICALS MARKET, BY KEY FUNCTION & COUNTRY
           FIGURE 10 NORTH AMERICA WAS ONE OF THE MAJOR CONSUMERS OF BIOCONTROLS ACROSS THE GLOBE IN 2020
    4.4 AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICALS MARKET, BY FUNCTION AND REGION
           FIGURE 11 NORTH AMERICA ACCOUNTED FOR THE LARGEST MARKET SHARE OF THE AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICALS MARKET IN 2020

5 MARKET OVERVIEW (Page No. - 36)
    5.1 INTRODUCTION
    5.2 MACROECONOMIC INDICATORS
           5.2.1 INTRODUCTION
           5.2.2 INCREASE IN ORGANIC AGRICULTURAL FARM AREAS
                     FIGURE 12 ORGANIC FARM AREA GROWTH TREND, BY COUNTRY, 2016–2018 (‘000 HA)
           5.2.3 GROWING DEMAND FROM THE ORGANIC FOOD INDUSTRY
                     FIGURE 13 ORGANIC RETAIL SALES, BY COUNTRY, 2016–2018 (USD MILLION)
           5.2.4 HIGH COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF SYNTHETIC CROP PROTECTION PRODUCTS
                     FIGURE 14 REDUCED INTRODUCTION OF NEW ACTIVE INGREDIENTS, 1950–2010
           5.2.5 CLIMATIC CHANGE AND INCREASE IN ABIOTIC STRESSES ON PLANTS
    5.3 MARKET DYNAMICS
           5.3.1 DRIVERS
                    5.3.1.1 Initiatives by government agencies and increasing awareness about the need for sustainability in modern agriculture
                    5.3.1.2 Regulatory pressures and harmful effects associated with synthetic plant protection products
                    5.3.1.3 Growing preference for organic products
                                FIGURE 15 EUROPE: ORGANIC MARKET SHARE, BY COUNTRY, 2018 VS. 2019
                    5.3.1.4 Limited entry barriers resulting in the entry of players of different tiers
                    5.3.1.5 Hazards of using chemical fertilizers
                    5.3.1.6 Strong demand for high-value cash crops
                                FIGURE 16 AREA HARVESTED FOR FRUIT & VEGETABLE CROPS, 2015–2019 (MILLION HECTARE)
                    5.3.1.7 Crop losses due to pest attacks
                                FIGURE 17 EFFICACY OF BIOPESTICIDES AGAINST DOWNEY MILDEW ON ROMAINE LETTUCE
           5.3.2 RESTRAINTS
                    5.3.2.1 Technological and environmental constraints for the use of biologicals
                    5.3.2.2 Poor infrastructure & high initial investment
                    5.3.2.3 Commercialization of low-quality biological products
                    5.3.2.4 Short shelf-life of biopesticides
           5.3.3 OPPORTUNITIES
                    5.3.3.1 Advancements in microbial research across the globe
                    5.3.3.2 New target markets: Asia Pacific & Africa
                    5.3.3.3 Need for development of broad-spectrum formulations in agricultural biologicals
                    5.3.3.4 Rapid growth in bio-control seed treatment solutions
           5.3.4 CHALLENGES
                    5.3.4.1 Lack of awareness & low adoption rate of biologicals
                    5.3.4.2 Supply of counterfeit and less-effective products
                    5.3.4.3 Prevalence of uncertainty on the regulatory framework of agricultural biologicals, globally
                    5.3.4.4 High preference for agrochemicals among farmers
    5.4 PATENT ANALYSIS
    5.5 PATENT ANALYSIS FOR THE BIOFERTILIZERS MARKET
           FIGURE 18 NUMBER OF PATENTS APPROVED FOR BIOFERTILIZERS IN THE GLOBAL MARKET, 2010–2021
           FIGURE 19 REGIONAL ANALYSIS: PATENT APPROVAL FOR BIOFERTILIZER PRODUCTS, 2020
           TABLE 2 LIST OF MAJOR PATENTS PERTAINING TO BIOFERTILIZERS, 2017–2019
           5.5.1 PATENT ANALYSIS FOR THE BIOPESTICIDES MARKET
                     FIGURE 20 NUMBER OF PATENTS APPROVED FOR BIOPESTICIDE STRAINS IN THE GLOBAL MARKET, 2012–2020
                     FIGURE 21 REGIONAL ANALYSIS: PATENT APPROVAL FOR BIOPESTICIDE PRODUCTS, 2012–2020
                     TABLE 3 LIST OF MAJOR PATENTS FOR BIOPESTICIDES, 20182019
    5.6 PATENT ANALYSIS FOR THE BIOSTIMULANTS MARKET
           FIGURE 22 NUMBER OF PATENTS APPROVED FOR BIOSTIMULANTS, 2010–2020
           FIGURE 23 TOP APPLICANTS FOR BIOSTIMULANT PATENTS, 2005–2021
           FIGURE 24 MOST ACTIVE REGIONS FOR PATENTS, 2005–2021
           TABLE 4 LIST OF IMPORTANT PATENTS FOR BIOSTIMULANTS, 2009–2021
    5.7 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
           5.7.1 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR BIOPESTICIDES
                    5.7.1.1 US
                               5.7.1.1.1 Main statutes and legal requirements
                                             5.7.1.1.1.1 The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
                                             5.7.1.1.1.2 The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) and the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA)
                                             5.7.1.1.1.3 Pesticide Registration Improvement Extension Act (PRIA 3), 2012
                                             5.7.1.1.1.4 Biopesticide Registration
           5.7.2 EUROPE
                    5.7.2.1 Europe union
                               5.7.2.1.1 Regulation (EC) no 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the council of 21 October 2009
                                             5.7.2.1.1.1 Scope
                                             5.7.2.1.1.2 Active Substances: Requirements and Conditions for Approval
                               5.7.2.1.2 First Approval
                    5.7.2.2 Russia
           5.7.3 ASIA PACIFIC
                    5.7.3.1 India
                    5.7.3.2 China
           5.7.4 BRAZIL
           5.7.5 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR BIOSTIMULANTS
                    5.7.5.1 Austria
                    5.7.5.2 France
                    5.7.5.3 Germany
                    5.7.5.4 Italy
                    5.7.5.5 Ireland
                    5.7.5.6 Spain
                    5.7.5.7 UK
           5.7.6 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR BIOFERTILIZERS
                    5.7.6.1 North America
                               5.7.6.1.1 Canada
                    5.7.6.2 Europe
                               5.7.6.2.1 Spain
                               5.7.6.2.2 Italy
                    5.7.6.3 Asia Pacific
                               5.7.6.3.1 India
                               5.7.6.3.2 China
                               5.7.6.3.3 Taiwan
                               5.7.6.3.4 Thailand
                               5.7.6.3.5 Australia
                               5.7.6.3.6 Vietnam
                               5.7.6.3.7 Philippines
                               5.7.6.3.8 Bhutan
                    5.7.6.4 South America
                               5.7.6.4.1 Brazil
                    5.7.6.5 RoW
    5.8 SUPPLY CHAIN ANALYSIS
           FIGURE 25 SUPPLY CHAIN ANALYSIS
    5.9 VALUE CHAIN ANALYSIS
           FIGURE 26 VALUE CHAIN ANALYSIS

6 AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICALS (Page No. - 79)
    6.1 OVERVIEW
    6.2 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
           6.2.1 INTRODUCTION
                    FIGURE 27 TOP 10 TRENDS IN AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICALS MARKET: KEY STRATEGIES ADOPTED BY COMPANIES, 2017–2021
           6.2.2 COMPETITIVE SCENARIO & TRENDS
                    FIGURE 28 TOP 10 TRENDS IN GLOBAL AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICALS MARKET COMPETITIVE LEADERSHIP MAPPING, 2021
                    6.2.2.1 New Product Launches & Developments
                                TABLE 5 AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICALS: NEW PRODUCT LAUNCHES & DEVELOPMENTS, 2017–2021
                    6.2.2.2 Agreements, Partnerships, & Collaborations
                                TABLE 6 AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICALS: AGREEMENTS, PARTNERSHIPS, & COLLABORATIONS, 2017–2021
                    6.2.2.3 Expansions & Investments
                                TABLE 7 AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICALS: EXPANSIONS & INVESTMENTS, 2017–2021
                    6.2.2.4 Mergers & Acquisitions
                                TABLE 8 AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICALS: MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS, 2017–2021
           6.2.3 COMPANY RANKING ANALYSIS
                    FIGURE 29 AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICALS MARKET: COMPANY RANKINGS, 2020
    6.3 REGIONAL MARKET ANALYSIS
           TABLE 9 AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICALS MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018–2026 (USD MILLION)

7 BIOCONTROLS (Page No. - 98)
    7.1 OVERVIEW
    7.2 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
           7.2.1 INTRODUCTION
                    FIGURE 30 BIOCONTROLS MARKET: KEY STRATEGIES ADOPTED BY COMPANIES, 2017–2021
           7.2.2 COMPETITIVE SCENARIO & TRENDS
                    FIGURE 31 GLOBAL BIOCONTROLS MARKET COMPETITIVE LEADERSHIP MAPPING, 2021
                    7.2.2.1 New Product Launches & Developments
                                TABLE 10 BIOCONTROLS MARKET: NEW PRODUCT LAUNCHES & DEVELOPMENTS, 2017–2021
                    7.2.2.2 Agreements, Partnerships & Collaborations
                                TABLE 11 BIOCONTROLS MARKET: AGREEMENTS, PARTNERSHIPS, & COLLABORATIONS, 2017–2021
                    7.2.2.3 Expansions & Investments
                                TABLE 12 BIOCONTROLS MARKET: EXPANSIONS & INVESTMENTS, 2017–2021
                    7.2.2.4 Mergers & Acquisitions
                                TABLE 13 BIOCONTROLS MARKET: MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS, 2017–2021
           7.2.3 COMPANY RANKING ANALYSIS
                   FIGURE 32 BIOCONTROLS MARKET: COMPANY RANKINGS, 2020
    7.3 REGIONAL MARKET ANALYSIS
           TABLE 14 BIOCONTROLS MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018–2026 (USD MILLION)

8 BIOFERTILIZERS (Page No. - 111)
    8.1 OVERVIEW
    8.2 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
           8.2.1 INTRODUCTION
                     FIGURE 33 BIOFERTILIZERS MARKET: KEY STRATEGIES ADOPTED BY COMPANIES, 2017–2021
           8.2.2 COMPETITIVE SCENARIO & TRENDS
                     FIGURE 34 TOP TRENDS IN GLOBAL AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICALS MARKET COMPETITIVE LEADERSHIP MAPPING, 2021
                    8.2.2.1 New product launches & developments
                                TABLE 15 BIOFERTILIZERS MARKET: NEW PRODUCT LAUNCHES & DEVELOPMENTS, 2017–2021
                    8.2.2.2 Agreements, partnerships, & collaborations
                                TABLE 16 BIOFERTILIZERS MARKET: AGREEMENTS, PARTNERSHIPS, & COLLABORATIONS, 2017–2021
                    8.2.2.3 Expansions & Investments
                                TABLE 17 BIOFERTILIZERS MARKET: EXPANSIONS & INVESTMENTS, 2017–2021
                    8.2.2.4 Mergers & Acquisitions
                                TABLE 18 BIOFERTILIZERS MARKET: MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS, 2017-2021
           8.2.3 COMPANY RANKING ANALYSIS
                    FIGURE 35 BIOFERTILIZERS MARKET: COMPANY RANKINGS, 2020
    8.3 REGIONAL MARKET ANALYSIS
           TABLE 19 BIOFERTILIZERS MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018–2026 (USD MILLION)

9 BIOSTIMULANTS (Page No. - 118)
    9.1 OVERVIEW
    9.2 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
           9.2.1 INTRODUCTION
                     FIGURE 36 BIOSTIMULANTS MARKET: KEY STRATEGIES ADOPTED BY COMPANIES, 2017-2021
           9.2.2 COMPETITIVE SCENARIO & TRENDS
                    FIGURE 37 GLOBAL BIOSTIMULANTS MARKET COMPETITIVE LEADERSHIP MAPPING, 2021
                    9.2.2.1 Agreements, partnerships & collaborations
                                TABLE 20 BIOSTIMULANTS MARKET: AGREEMENTS, PARTNERSHIPS & COLLABORATIONS, 2017–2021
                    9.2.2.2 New product launches, product approvals & registrations
                                TABLE 21 BIOSTIMULANTS MARKET: NEW PRODUCT LAUNCHES, PRODUCT APPROVALS & REGISTRATIONS, 2017–2021
                    9.2.2.3 Expansions & Investments
                                TABLE 22 BIOSTIMULANTS MARKET: EXPANSIONS & INVESTMENTS, 2017–2021
                    9.2.2.4 Mergers & acquisitions
                                TABLE 23 BIOSTIMULANTS MARKET: MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS, 2017–2021
           9.2.3 COMPANY RANKING ANALYSIS
                    FIGURE 38 BIOSTIMULANTS MARKET: COMPANY RANKINGS, 2020
    9.3 REGIONAL MARKET ANALYSIS
           TABLE 24 BIOSTIMULANTS MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018–2026 (USD MILLION)

10 BIOINSECTICIDES (Page No. - 129)
     10.1 OVERVIEW
     10.2 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
             10.2.1 INTRODUCTION
                        FIGURE 39 BIOINSECTICIDES MARKET: KEY STRATEGIES ADOPTED BY COMPANIES, 2017-2021
             10.2.2 COMPETITIVE SCENARIO & TRENDS
                        FIGURE 40 BIOINSECTICIDES MARKET: TRENDS IN COMPANY STRATEGIES, 2017-2021
                        10.2.2.1 Agreements, partnerships & collaborations
                                     TABLE 25 BIOINSECTICIDES MARKET: AGREEMENTS, PARTNERSHIPS & COLLABORATIONS, 2017–2021
                        10.2.2.2 Mergers & acquisitions
                                     TABLE 26 BIOINSECTICIDES MARKET: MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS, 2017-2021
                        10.2.2.3 Expansions & investments
                                     TABLE 27 BIOINSECTICIDES MARKET: EXPANSIONS & INVESTMENTS, 2017–2021
                        10.2.2.4 New product developments & Registrations
                                     TABLE 28 BIOINSECTICIDES MARKET: NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENTS & REGISTRATIONS, 2017–2021
             10.2.3 COMPANY RANKING ANALYSIS, 2020
                        FIGURE 41 BIOINSECTICIDES MARKET: COMPANY RANKINGS, 2020
     10.3 REGIONAL MARKET ANALYSIS
             TABLE 29 BIOINSECTICIDES MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018–2026 (USD MILLION)

11 BIOFUNGICIDES (Page No. - 139)
     11.1 OVERVIEW
     11.2 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
             11.2.1 INTRODUCTION
                        FIGURE 42 BIOFUNGICIDES: KEY STRATEGIES ADOPTED BY COMPANIES, 2017–2021
             11.2.2 COMPETITIVE SCENARIO & TRENDS
                        FIGURE 43 BIOFUNGICIDES: TRENDS IN COMPANY STRATEGIES, 2017-2021
                        11.2.2.1 Agreements, partnerships & collaborations
                                     TABLE 30 BIOFUNGICIDES: AGREEMENTS, PARTNERSHIPS & COLLABORATIONS, 2017–2021
                        11.2.2.2 New product launches, product approvals & registrations
                                     TABLE 31 BIOFUNGICIDES: NEW PRODUCT LAUNCHES, PRODUCT APPROVALS & REGISTRATIONS, 2017–2021
                        11.2.2.3 Expansions & Investments
                                     TABLE 32 BIOFUNGICIDES: EXPANSIONS & INVESTMENTS, 2017–2021
                        11.2.2.4 Mergers & acquisitions
                                     TABLE 33 BIOFUNGICIDES: MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS, 2017–2021
             11.2.3 COMPANY RANKING ANALYSIS
                       FIGURE 44 BIOFUNGICIDES: COMPANY RANKINGS, 2020
     11.3 REGIONAL MARKET ANALYSIS
             TABLE 34 BIOFUNGICIDES MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018–2026 (USD MILLION)

12 BIONEMATICIDES (Page No. - 150)
     12.1 OVERVIEW
     12.2 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
             12.2.1 INTRODUCTION
                        FIGURE 45 BIONEMATICIDES MARKET: KEY STRATEGIES ADOPTED BY COMPANIES, 2017–2021
             12.2.2 COMPETITIVE SCENARIO & TRENDS
                        FIGURE 46 BIONEMATICIDES MARKET: TRENDS IN COMPANY STRATEGIES, 2017-2021
                        12.2.2.1 Agreements, partnerships & collaborations
                                     TABLE 35 BIONEMATICIDES MARKET: AGREEMENTS, PARTNERSHIPS & COLLABORATIONS, 2017–2021
                        12.2.2.2 Mergers & acquisitions
                                     TABLE 36 BIONEMATICIDES MARKET: MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS, 2017-2021
                        12.2.2.3 Expansions & investments
                                     TABLE 37 BIONEMATICIDES MARKET: EXPANSIONS & INVESTMENTS, 2017–2021
                        12.2.2.4 New product developments & product approvals
                                     TABLE 38 BIONEMATICIDES MARKET: NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENTS & PRODUCT APPROVALS, 2017–2021
             12.2.3 COMPANY RANKING ANALYSIS, 2020
                        FIGURE 47 BIONEMATICIDES MARKET: COMPANY RANKINGS, 2020
     12.3 REGIONAL MARKET ANALYSIS
             TABLE 39 BIONEMATICIDES MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018–2026 (USD MILLION)

13 BIOLOGICAL SEED TREATMENT (Page No. - 160)
     13.1 OVERVIEW
     13.2 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
             13.2.1 INTRODUCTION
                        FIGURE 48 BIOLOGICAL SEED TREATMENT MARKET: KEY STRATEGIES ADOPTED BY COMPANIES, 2017–2021
             13.2.2 COMPETITIVE SCENARIO & TRENDS
                        FIGURE 49 BIOLOGICAL SEED TREATMENT MARKET: TRENDS IN COMPANY STRATEGIES, 2017-2021
                        13.2.2.1 Agreements, Partnerships & Collaborations
                                     TABLE 40 BIOLOGICAL SEED TREATMENT MARKET: AGREEMENTS, PARTNERSHIPS & COLLABORATIONS, 2017–2021
                        13.2.2.2 New product launches, product approvals & registrations
                                     TABLE 41 BIOLOGICAL SEED TREATMENT MARKET: NEW PRODUCT LAUNCHES, PRODUCT APPROVALS & REGISTRATIONS, 2017–2021
                        13.2.2.3 Expansions & Investments
                                     TABLE 42 BIOLOGICAL SEED TREATMENT MARKET: EXPANSIONS & INVESTMENTS, 2017–2021
                        13.2.2.4 Mergers & acquisitions
                                     TABLE 43 BIOLOGICAL SEED TREATMENT MARKET: MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS, 2017–2021
             13.2.3 COMPANY RANKING ANALYSIS
                        FIGURE 50 BIOLOGICAL SEED TREATMENT MARKET: COMPANY RANKINGS, 2020
     13.3 REGIONAL MARKET ANALYSIS
             TABLE 44 BIOLOGICAL SEED TREATMENT MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018–2026 (USD MILLION)

14 AGRICULTURAL INOCULANTS (Page No. - 169)
     14.1 OVERVIEW
     14.2 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
             14.2.1 INTRODUCTION
                        FIGURE 51 AGRICULTURAL INOCULANTS MARKET: KEY STRATEGIES ADOPTED BY COMPANIES, 2017–2021
             14.2.2 COMPETITIVE SCENARIO & TRENDS
                        FIGURE 52 AGRICULTURAL INOCULANTS MARKET: TRENDS IN COMPANY STRATEGIES, 2017-2021
                        14.2.2.1 Agreements, partnerships & collaborations
                                     TABLE 45 AGRICULTURAL INOCULANTS MARKET: AGREEMENTS, PARTNERSHIPS & COLLABORATIONS, 2017–2021
                        14.2.2.2 New product launches, product approvals & registrations
                                     TABLE 46 AGRICULTURAL INOCULANTS MARKET: NEW PRODUCT LAUNCHES, PRODUCT APPROVALS & REGISTRATIONS, 2017–2021
                        14.2.2.3 Expansions & Investments
                                     TABLE 47 AGRICULTURAL INOCULANTS MARKET: EXPANSIONS & INVESTMENTS, 2017–2021
                        14.2.2.4 Mergers & acquisitions
                                     TABLE 48 AGRICULTURAL INOCULANTS MARKET: MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS, 2017–2021
             14.2.3 COMPANY RANKING ANALYSIS
                        FIGURE 53 AGRICULTURAL INOCULANTS MARKET: COMPANY RANKINGS, 2020
     14.3 REGIONAL MARKET ANALYSIS
             TABLE 49 AGRICULTURAL INOCULANTS MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018–2026 (USD MILLION)

15 AGRICULTURAL PHEROMONES (Page No. - 177)
     15.1 OVERVIEW
     15.2 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
             15.2.1 INTRODUCTION
                        FIGURE 54 AGRICULTURAL PHEROMONES MARKET: KEY STRATEGIES ADOPTED BY COMPANIES, 2017–2021
             15.2.2 COMPETITIVE SCENARIO & TRENDS
                        FIGURE 55 AGRICULTURAL PHEROMONES MARKET: TRENDS IN COMPANY STRATEGIES, 2017-2021
                        15.2.2.1 Agreements, partnerships & collaborations
                                     TABLE 50 AGRICULTURAL PHEROMONES MARKET: AGREEMENTS, PARTNERSHIPS & COLLABORATIONS, 2017–2021
                        15.2.2.2 New product launches, product approvals & registrations
                                     TABLE 51 AGRICULTURAL PHEROMONES MARKET: NEW PRODUCT LAUNCHES, PRODUCT APPROVALS & REGISTRATIONS, 2017–2021
                        15.2.2.3 Expansions & Investments
                                     TABLE 52 AGRICULTURAL PHEROMONES MARKET: EXPANSIONS & INVESTMENTS, 2017–2021
                        15.2.2.4 Mergers & acquisitions
                                     TABLE 53 AGRICULTURAL PHEROMONES MARKET: MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS, 2017–2021
             15.2.3 COMPANY RANKING ANALYSIS
                        FIGURE 56 AGRICULTURAL PHEROMONES MARKET: COMPANY RANKINGS, 2020
     15.3 REGIONAL MARKET ANALYSIS
             TABLE 54 AGRICULTURAL PHEROMONES MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018–2026

16 COMPANY PROFILES (Page No. - 185)
     (Business overview, Products offered, Recent Developments, SWOT analysis, Right to Win)* 
     16.1 BASF SE
              FIGURE 57 BASF SE: COMPANY SNAPSHOT
     16.2 BAYER AG
              FIGURE 58 BAYER AG: COMPANY SNAPSHOT
     16.3 SYNGENTA AG
              FIGURE 59 SYNGENTA AG: COMPANY SNAPSHOT
     16.4 UPL
              FIGURE 60 UPL: COMPANY SNAPSHOT
     16.5 CORTEVA AGRISCIENCE
              FIGURE 61 CORTEVA AGRISCIENCE: COMPANY SNAPSHOT
              FIGURE 62 CORTEVA AGRISCIENCE: SWOT ANALYSIS
     16.6 ISAGRO S.P.A
              FIGURE 63 ISAGRO S.P.A: COMPANY SNAPSHOT
     16.7 MARRONE BIO INNOVATIONS
              FIGURE 64 MARRONE BIO INNOVATIONS: COMPANY SNAPSHOT
     16.8 EVOGENE LTD
              FIGURE 65 EVOGENE LTD: COMPANY SNAPSHOT
     16.9 VEGALAB S.A
              TABLE 55 VEGALAB S.A: BUSINESS OVERVIEW
     16.10 LALLEMAND
              TABLE 56 LALLEMAND: BUSINESS OVERVIEW
     16.11 VALENT BIOSCIENCES
              TABLE 57 VALENT BIOSCIENCE: BUSINESS OVERVIEW
     16.12 STOCKTON BIO-AG
              TABLE 58 STOCKTON BIO-AG: BUSINESS OVERVIEW
     16.13 BIOLCHIM S.P.A.
              TABLE 59 BIOLCHIM S.P.A: BUSINESS OVERVIEW
     16.14 RIZOBACTER
              TABLE 60 RIZOBACTER: BUSINESS OVERVIEW
     16.15 VALAGRO SPA
              TABLE 61 VALAGRO: BUSINESS OVERVIEW
     16.16 KOPPERT BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS
              TABLE 62 KOPPERT BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS: BUSINESS OVERVIEW
     16.17 SEIPASA
              TABLE 63 SEIPASA: BUSINESS OVERVIEW
     16.18 ITALPOLLINA
              TABLE 64 ITALPOLLINA: BUSINESS OVERVIEW
     16.19 HAIFA GROUP
              TABLE 65 HAIFA GROUP: BUSINESS OVERVIEW
     16.20 CERTIS USA LLC
              TABLE 66 CERTIS USA LLC: BUSINESS OVERVIEW
*Details on Business overview, Products offered, Recent Developments, SWOT analysis, Right to Win might not be captured in case of unlisted companies. 

17 APPENDIX (Page No. - 243)
     17.1 DISCUSSION GUIDE
     17.2 KNOWLEDGE STORE: MARKETSANDMARKETS’ SUBSCRIPTION PORTAL
     17.3 AVAILABLE CUSTOMIZATIONS
     17.4 RELATED REPORTS
     17.5 AUTHOR DETAILS

The study involves identifying the top trends in agricultural biologicals. Exhaustive secondary research was done to collect information on the market, peer market, and parent market. These findings, assumptions, and market sizes were validated with industry experts across the value chain through primary research. Both the top-down and bottom-up approaches were employed to estimate the complete market size. After that, the market breakdown and data triangulation approaches were used to estimate the market size of segments and subsegments.

Secondary Research

In the secondary research process, various secondary sources, such as Hoovers, Bloomberg BusinessWeek, and Dun & Bradstreet, were referred to identify and collect information for this study. These secondary sources included annual reports, press releases & investor presentations of companies, white papers, certified publications, articles by recognized authors, gold standard & silver standard websites, food safety organizations, regulatory bodies, trade directories, and databases.

Primary Research

The market comprises several stakeholders in the supply chain, which include suppliers, manufacturers, and end-use product manufacturers. Various primary sources from both supply and demand sides of both markets have been interviewed to obtain qualitative and quantitative information. The primary interviewees from the demand side include key opinion leaders, executives, vice presidents, and CEOs of companies manufacturing biologicals. The primary sources from the supply side include research institutions involved in R&D, key opinion leaders, and manufacturing companies.

Top Trends in the Agricultural Biologicals Market Size, and Share

To know about the assumptions considered for the study, download the pdf brochure

Market Size Estimation

The agricultural biologicals market was considered as a parent market for arriving at the global markets value for different child market segments in this report. The key trends of the agricultural biologicals industries have been identified and studied in this report. Top-down approach has been used extensively to estimate the size of various dependent submarkets. The research methodology used to estimate the market size includes the following:

  • The key players have been identified through extensive secondary research.
  • All percentage shares have been determined using secondary sources and verified through primary sources.
  • All the possible parameters that affect the markets covered in this research study have been accounted for, viewed in extensive detail, verified through primary research, and analyzed to obtain the final quantitative and qualitative data at regional level.
  • The research included the study of the reports, reviews, and newsletters of top market players along with extensive interviews for opinions from leaders such as CEOs, directors, and marketing executives.

Data Triangulation

In order to evaluate the overall agricultural biologicals market and arrive at the exact statistics for all segments and subsegments, the data triangulation and market breakdown procedures have been employed, wherever applicable. The data has been triangulated by studying various factors and trends from both the demand and supply sides.

Report Objectives

  • To describe, segment, and project the global market size for the agricultural biologicals market
  • To offer detailed information about the key factors influencing the growth of the market (drivers, restraints, opportunities, and industry-specific challenges)
  • To evaluate the micro-markets, concerning individual growth trends, prospects, and their contribution to the total agricultural biologicals market
  • To propose the size of the submarkets, in terms of value, for various regions
  • To profile the major players and comprehensively analyze their core competencies
  • To understand the competitive landscape and identify the major growth strategies adopted by the players across key regions
  • To analyze the competitive developments such as expansions & investments, mergers & acquisitions, new product launches, partnerships, joint ventures, and agreements.

Available Customizations

With the given market data, MarketsandMarkets offers customizations according to company-specific scientific needs.

The following customization options are available for the report:

Product Analysis

  • Product matrix, which gives a detailed comparison of the product portfolio of each company

Company Information

  • Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five)
COVID-19

Get in-depth analysis of the COVID-19 impact on the Top Trends in the Agricultural Biologicals Market

Benchmarking the rapid strategy shifts of the Top 100 companies in the Top Trends in the Agricultural Biologicals Market

Request For Special Pricing
Report Code
AGI 4970
Published ON
Dec, 2021
Choose License Type
BUY NOW
  • SHARE
X
Request Customization
Speak to Analyst
Speak to Analyst
OR FACE-TO-FACE MEETING
PERSONALIZE THIS RESEARCH
  • Triangulate with your Own Data
  • Get Data as per your Format and Definition
  • Gain a Deeper Dive on a Specific Application, Geography, Customer or Competitor
  • Any level of Personalization
REQUEST A FREE CUSTOMIZATION
LET US HELP YOU!
  • What are the Known and Unknown Adjacencies Impacting the Top Trends in the Agricultural Biologicals Market
  • What will your New Revenue Sources be?
  • Who will be your Top Customer; what will make them switch?
  • Defend your Market Share or Win Competitors
  • Get a Scorecard for Target Partners
CUSTOMIZED WORKSHOP REQUEST
ADJACENT MARKETS
REQUEST BUNDLE REPORTS
+1-888-600-6441
  • Call Us
  • +1-888-600-6441 (Corporate office hours)
  • +1-888-600-6441 (US/Can toll free)
  • +44-800-368-9399 (UK office hours)
CONNECT WITH US
ABOUT TRUST ONLINE
©2021 MarketsandMarkets Research Private Ltd. All rights reserved