United States Closed System Transfer Devices Market by Closing Mechanism [Push-to-Turn, Click-to-lock, Luer Lock System], Component [Female Component, Vial Access, Bag Spike], Type [Membrane-to-Membrane, Needleless], End User [Hospitals, Clinics] - Forecast to 2031

Market Size
$0.66B
MARKET SIZE, 2026
Projected Market Size
$0.87B
MARKET SIZE, 2031
CAGR
5.5%
CAGR (2026-2031)
Forecast Period
2026-2031
FORECAST PERIOD

UNITED STATES CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET SIZE, SHARE & GROWTH SNAPSHOT

us-closed-system-transfer-devices-market Overview

Source: Secondary Research, Interviews with Experts, MarketsandMarkets Analysis

The United States closed system transfer devices market is projected to grow from USD 0.66 billion in 2026 to USD 0.87 billion by 2031, at a CAGR of 5.5% during the forecast period. The market was valued at USD 0.62 billion in 2025. This growth is due to growing hazardous-drug use, rising awareness of occupational exposure risks, and greater adoption of engineering controls to protect healthcare workers during drug preparation and administration.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • MARKET SNAPSHOT:
    Base Year Market Size (2025): USD 0.62 Billion
    Current Market Size (2026): USD 0.66 Billion
    Forecast Market Size (2031): USD 0.87 Billion
    CAGR (2026–2031): 5.5%
  • SEGMENT LEADERSHIP:
    Component Leader: Female components accounted for the largest share of 28.9% of the US closed system transfer devices market in 2025.
    Type Leader: Membrane-to-membrane systems accounted for the largest share of 67% of the US closed system transfer devices market in 2025.
    Technology Leader: Diaphragm-based devices accounted for the largest share of 40.6% of the US closed system transfer devices market in 2025.
    Closing Mechanism Leader: Luer lock systems accounted for the largest share of the US closed system transfer devices market in 2025.
    End User Leader: Hospitals & clinics accounted for the largest share of the US closed system transfer devices market in 2025.
  • MARKET OUTLOOK & COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE:
    ICU Medical (US) and Becton and Dickinson Company (US) were recognized as star players due to their established strong product portfolios & geographic presence.

The US closed system transfer devices (CSTD) market is expanding as oncology and other hazardous drug treatments increase, while healthcare facilities place greater emphasis on minimizing occupational exposure. CSTDs reduce hazardous-drug and vapor escape and can lower surface contamination, encouraging adoption across hospital pharmacies, oncology centers, and infusion settings.

TRENDS & DISRUPTIONS IMPACTING CUSTOMERS' CUSTOMERS

Trends and disruptions impacting CSTD customers, hospitals, pharmacies, and oncology centers include stricter hazardous-drug handling practices, greater emphasis on healthcare-worker safety, and broader implementation of USP <800>. CSTDs are required for administering NIOSH-listed antineoplastic hazardous drugs when the dosage form allows, increasing institutional demand. Customers are also moving toward integrated, compatible systems that connect pharmacy compounding with administration workflows, while evaluating CSTD chemical compatibility and containment performance. Increasing awareness of hazardous-drug contamination and occupational exposure is further encouraging facilities to upgrade engineering controls and staff practices.

us-closed-system-transfer-devices-market Disruptions

Source: Secondary Research, Interviews with Experts, MarketsandMarkets Analysis

MARKET DYNAMICS

Drivers
Impact
Level
  • Growing incidence of cancer and subsequent use of chemotherapy to boost market
  • Increasing oncology drug approvals and awareness of antineoplastic drug risks to drive adoption
RESTRAINTS
Impact
Level
  • Reimbursement pressure and test-price controls
OPPORTUNITIES
Impact
Level
  • Growth potential across therapeutic applications and increasing healthcare expenditure to create market opportunities
CHALLENGES
Impact
Level
  • Operational barriers and data privacy and cybersecurity risks

Source: Secondary Research, Interviews with Experts, MarketsandMarkets Analysis

Driver: Growing incidence of cancer and subsequent use of chemotherapy to boost market

Growing incidence of cancer and the subsequent increase in chemotherapy and other antineoplastic drug use are driving demand for CSTDs in the US. As the volume and complexity of hazardous-drug preparation and administration increase, healthcare facilities require effective engineering controls to minimize occupational exposure. NIOSH identifies CSTDs as an engineering control that mechanically prevents hazardous-drug or vapor escape and environmental contaminants from entering the system. Increasing awareness among pharmacists, nurses, and hospital administrators regarding the potential reproductive, genetic, and carcinogenic risks associated with occupational exposure is further supporting adoption. Consequently, hospitals and oncology centers are increasingly incorporating CSTDs into hazardous-drug handling workflows, supporting sustained market expansion.

Restraint: Reimbursement pressure and test-price controls

Reimbursement pressure and test-price controls can constrain CSTD adoption because these devices add consumable costs to hazardous drug preparation and administration workflows. Healthcare providers may struggle to obtain direct reimbursement for CSTD-related costs, particularly when procurement budgets are tightly controlled. Consequently, hospitals and pharmacies may prioritize lower-cost alternatives or limit CSTD adoption to applications where their use is required or strongly recommended. Price negotiations with group purchasing organizations and healthcare systems can further pressure manufacturers to maintain competitive pricing, potentially limiting revenue growth. These factors can slow adoption, particularly among smaller healthcare facilities with constrained budgets and limited resources for upgrading hazardous-drug handling infrastructure.

Opportunity: Growth potential across therapeutic applications and increasing healthcare expenditure to create market opportunities

Growth potential across therapeutic applications and increasing healthcare expenditure create opportunities for CSTD manufacturers to expand beyond traditional chemotherapy applications. NIOSH identifies hazardous drugs across multiple therapeutic categories, including antineoplastic agents, antivirals, hormones, and some immunosuppressive drugs, broadening the potential addressable application base. Rising healthcare spending and investments in hospital pharmacy infrastructure can support adoption of advanced hazardous-drug handling technologies. Manufacturers can capitalize by developing CSTD portfolios compatible with diverse drug formulations, administration routes, and compounding workflows. This expansion can help key players increase their customer base, strengthen hospital contracts, introduce complementary products, and generate recurring revenue from CSTD components and accessories.

Challenge: Operational barriers and data privacy and cybersecurity risks

Operational barriers and data privacy and cybersecurity risks can challenge the adoption of increasingly integrated hazardous-drug handling technologies. Implementing CSTDs may require workflow modifications, staff training, compatibility assessment, and coordination between pharmacy and nursing departments. NIOSH notes that exposure-control effectiveness depends partly on work practices, frequency of exposure, and the availability of engineering controls. In addition, automated or digitally connected compounding and medication-management systems can introduce cybersecurity and data-security considerations. Healthcare providers therefore need to balance worker protection with operational efficiency, system interoperability, training requirements, and information-security controls, potentially slowing deployment of advanced CSTD solutions.

US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET: COMMERCIAL USE CASES ACROSS INDUSTRIES

COMPANY USE CASE DESCRIPTION BENEFITS
company logo
ChemoLock and ChemoClave are used during hazardous drug preparation, transport, and administration in hospitals and oncology settings, maintaining a closed connection across pharmacy and nursing workflows. Reduces hazardous-drug exposure, minimizes leaks and spills, supports USP <800> compliance, and improves workflow efficiency through needlefree and flexible connection options.
company logo
BD PhaSeal Optima is used by pharmacists and clinicians for preparation and administration of hazardous drugs, including vial access, drug transfer, syringe handling, and IV administration. Provides airtight and leakproof drug transfer, reduces surface and environmental contamination, and helps minimize healthcare-worker exposure to drug vapors, aerosols, and spills.
company logo
EQUASHIELD CSTD is used for hazardous drug preparation, reconstitution, compounding, transport, and administration across hospital and oncology pharmacy workflows. Its closed-back syringe and adaptors provide containment throughout the medication-handling process. Reduces hazardous-drug and vapor exposure, prevents syringe-plunger contamination, minimizes leaks and spills, and supports efficient preparation and administration workflows.
company logo
OnGuard 2 is used across hazardous-drug preparation and administration, including vial reconstitution, syringe transfer, IV-bag connection, and closed administration through IV and catheter systems. Provides closed, secure connections, reduces drug leakage and exposur,; prevents microbial and airborne contamination, and simplifies workflow through click-to-lock connections and fewer required SKUs.
company logo
NEO SHIELD is used for safe preparation and administration of anticancer drugs, including vial transfer, drug-bag connection, and closed administration while maintaining the closed environment throughout the workflow. Reduces exposure risk during preparation and administration, simplifies operation, supports efficient drug preparation, and enables needle-free administration and closed priming.

Logos and trademarks shown above are the property of their respective owners. Their use here is for informational and illustrative purposes only.

MARKET ECOSYSTEM

The US CSTD ecosystem comprises CSTD manufacturers, component suppliers, pharmaceutical companies, distributors, and healthcare providers involved in hazardous drug preparation and administration. Manufacturers develop CSTDs and components such as vial adapters, syringe connectors, and infusion sets, while pharmaceutical companies generate demand through hazardous-drug production and treatment. Distributors and GPOs facilitate procurement and market access for hospitals, pharmacies, oncology centers, and infusion facilities. Healthcare professionals, particularly pharmacists, pharmacy technicians, and nurses, are the primary users. The ecosystem is also influenced by FDA regulatory requirements, USP <800> standards, and NIOSH hazardous-drug guidance, which shape product development, adoption, and safe-handling practices.

us-closed-system-transfer-devices-market Ecosystem

Logos and trademarks shown above are the property of their respective owners. Their use here is for informational and illustrative purposes only.

MARKET SEGMENTS

us-closed-system-transfer-devices-market Segments

Source: Secondary Research, Interviews with Experts, MarketsandMarkets Analysis

US Closed System Transfer Devices Market, by Type

By type, the US CSTDs market is segmented into membrane-to-membrane systems and needleless systems. Among these, membrane-to-membrane systems held the largest share of the US CSTD market in 2025 because their interlocking membrane design provides effective containment during hazardous-drug transfer. The system creates a closed pathway between components, helping minimize drug leakage, vapor escape, and environmental contamination. The membrane-to-membrane technology also enables needle-free connections, reducing needlestick exposure during repeated vial, syringe, and administration transfers. Its established use across oncology pharmacy workflows, availability from leading CSTD manufacturers, and compatibility with commonly used drug-transfer components have supported widespread adoption. These advantages make membrane-to-membrane systems particularly suitable for hazardous-drug preparation and administration.

US Closed System Transfer Devices Market, by Component

By component, the market is segmented into vial access components, male Luers, bag spikes, female components, and other components. Among these, female components accounted for the largest share of the US CSTD market in 2025 because they serve as critical connection interfaces throughout hazardous drug preparation and administration workflows. These components connect syringes, vial access devices, infusion bags, administration sets, and other CSTD elements while maintaining system closure. Their utilization across multiple transfer stages generates recurring demand compared with components used in more specific applications. Female components are also available in Luer-lock and needleless configurations, enabling compatibility with existing hospital medication delivery infrastructure. Their broad applicability, repeated use, and integration with different CSTD systems support their leading market position.

US Closed System Transfer Devices Market, by Closing Mechanism

By closing mechanism, the US CSTD market is segmented into Luer lock systems, push-to-turn systems, click-to-lock systems, and color-to-color alignment systems. Among these, the Luer lock systems segment held the largest share in 2025 due to its widespread use across syringes, vial adapters, infusion sets, and needleless connectors. Its threaded connection provides secure attachment and reduces accidental disconnection during hazardous-drug preparation and administration. Luer lock interfaces also offer compatibility with existing medication-delivery infrastructure, minimizing workflow modifications and staff retraining. Established familiarity among healthcare professionals, broad availability of compatible components, and integration across multiple CSTD configurations further support adoption, making Luer lock systems the preferred closing mechanism in US healthcare facilities.

US Closed System Transfer Devices Market, by Technology

Based on technology, the US CSTD market is segmented into diaphragm-based devices, compartmentalized devices, and air cleaning/filtration devices. Among these, the diaphragm-based devices segment held the largest share of the US CSTD market in 2025 because their resealing mechanism provides a reliable barrier against hazardous-drug leakage, vapor escape, and external contamination. The diaphragm automatically closes after disconnection, helping maintain containment during repeated drug-transfer activities. This technology can be incorporated into vial adapters, syringe connectors, and administration components, enabling broad application across pharmacy and nursing workflows. Its relatively straightforward operating mechanism, established commercial availability, and compatibility with commonly used CSTD components have encouraged adoption among healthcare facilities. The technology’s focus on containment and ease of use further supports its market dominance.

US Closed System Transfer Devices Market, by End User

Based on end users, the market is divided into hospitals and clinics, oncology centers, and other end users. Among these, the hospitals and clinics segment held the largest share of the US CSTD market in 2025 because they conduct substantial volumes of hazardous-drug preparation and administration, particularly for oncology patients. These facilities employ pharmacists, pharmacy technicians, nurses, and other healthcare professionals who may encounter hazardous drugs during routine workflows, creating strong demand for exposure-control measures. Hospitals also have centralized pharmacies and established procurement systems that facilitate CSTD adoption across multiple departments. Increasing emphasis on occupational safety, hazardous-drug handling practices, and compliance with applicable standards further supports utilization. Consequently, hospitals and clinics represent the largest and most established end-user base for CSTDs.

US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET: COMPANY EVALUATION MATRIX

In the US CSTD market matrix, ICU Medical, Inc. (US) (Star) and Becton, Dickinson and Company (US) (Star) lead with their unmatched regional presence, strong brand recognition, and comprehensive portfolios of closed system transfer devices.

us-closed-system-transfer-devices-market Evaluation Metrics

Source: Secondary Research, Interviews with Experts, MarketsandMarkets Analysis

KEY MARKET PLAYERS

MARKET SCOPE

REPORT METRIC DETAILS
Market Size in 2025 (Value) USD 0.62 Billion
Market Forecast in 2026 (Value) USD 0.66 Billion
Market Forecast in 2031 (Value) USD 0.87 Billion
Growth Rate CAGR of 5.5% from 2026–2031
Years Considered 2024–2031
Base Year 2025
Forecast Period 2026–2031
Units Considered Value (USD Million/Billion), Volume (Thousand Units)
Report Coverage Revenue Forecast, Company Ranking, Competitive Landscape, Growth Factors, and Trends
Segments Covered
  • By Closing Mechanism:
    • Luer Lock Systems
    • Push-to-turn Systems
    • Click-to-lock Systems
    • Color-to-Color Alignment Systems
  • By Type: Membrane-to-membrane Systems and Needleless Systems
  • By Component:
    • Vial Access Components
    • Male Luers
    • Bag Spikes
    • Female Components
    • Other Components
  • By Technology:
    • Diaphragm-based Devices
    • Compartmentalized Devices
    • Air Cleaning/Filtration Devices
  • By End User:
    • Hospitals and Clinics
    • Oncology Centers
    • Other End Users
Regional Scope US

WHAT IS IN IT FOR YOU: US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET REPORT CONTENT GUIDE

us-closed-system-transfer-devices-market Content Guide

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

  • December 2025 : Zephyrus Innovations received US FDA 510(k) clearance for VaporShield CSTD, a direct-injection CSTD designed for subcutaneous and intramuscular administration. The system combines drug containment with an auto-retractable needlestick-prevention mechanism and ultra-low dead space.
  • December 2025 : Epic Medical received FDA 510(k) clearance for ProSeal Transfer Injector, expanding its ProSeal CSTD portfolio with additional transfer-injector configurations for hazardous-drug preparation and administration.
  • September 2025 : BD received FDA 510(k) clearance for the PhaSeal Optima Connecting Set and Spike Set, expanding the Optima CSTD product family with additional components for hazardous-drug preparation and administration.
  • May 2025 : Epic Medical received FDA 510(k) clearance for ProSeal Bag Spike with Additive Port, extending its CSTD portfolio into additional IV-bag access and medication-administration applications.

 

Table of Contents

checkmarkExclusive indicates content/data unique to MarketsandMarkets and not available with any competitors.

TITLE
PAGE NO
1
INTRODUCTION
 
 
 
 
 
15
2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
 
 
 
 
 
19
3
PREMIUM INSIGHTS
 
 
 
 
 
23
4
MARKET OVERVIEW
Rising cancer rates and drug approvals drive growth, despite reimbursement and cybersecurity challenges.
 
 
 
 
 
24
 
4.1
INTRODUCTION
 
 
 
 
 
 
4.2
MARKET DYNAMICS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4.2.1
DRIVERS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4.2.1.1
GROWING INCIDENCE OF CANCER AND SUBSEQUENT USE OF CHEMOTHERAPY
 
 
 
 
 
 
4.2.1.2
INCREASING ONCOLOGY DRUG APPROVALS AND AWARENESS OF ANTINEOPLASTIC DRUG RISKS
 
 
 
 
 
4.2.2
RESTRAINTS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4.2.2.1
REIMBURSEMENT PRESSURE AND TEST-PRICE CONTROLS
 
 
 
 
 
4.2.3
OPPORTUNITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4.2.3.1
GROWTH POTENTIAL ACROSS THERAPEUTIC APPLICATIONS AND INCREASING HEALTHCARE EXPENDITURE
 
 
 
 
 
4.2.4
CHALLENGES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4.2.4.1
OPERATIONAL BARRIERS AND DATA PRIVACY AND CYBERSECURITY RISKS
 
 
 
 
4.3
UNMET NEEDS AND WHITE SPACES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4.3.1
UNMET NEEDS IN US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET
 
 
 
 
 
 
4.3.2
WHITE SPACE OPPORTUNITIES
 
 
 
 
 
4.4
INTERCONNECTED MARKETS AND CROSS-SECTOR OPPORTUNITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4.4.1
INTERCONNECTED MARKETS
 
 
 
 
 
 
4.4.2
CROSS-SECTOR OPPORTUNITIES
 
 
 
 
 
4.5
STRATEGIC MOVES BY TIER-1/2/3 PLAYERS
 
 
 
 
 
5
INDUSTRY TRENDS
Navigate competitive forces and pricing dynamics shaping the closed system transfer devices market.
 
 
 
 
 
29
 
5.1
PORTER’S FIVE FORCES ANALYSIS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.1.1
THREAT OF NEW ENTRANTS
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.1.2
THREAT OF SUBSTITUTES
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.1.3
BARGAINING POWER OF BUYERS
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.1.4
BARGAINING POWER OF SUPPLIERS
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.1.5
INTENSITY OF COMPETITIVE RIVALRY
 
 
 
 
 
5.2
MACROECONOMIC OUTLOOK
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.2.1
INTRODUCTION
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.2.2
GDP TRENDS AND FORECAST
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.2.3
TRENDS IN CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES INDUSTRY
 
 
 
 
 
5.3
SUPPLY CHAIN ANALYSIS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.4
VALUE CHAIN ANALYSIS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.5
ECOSYSTEM ANALYSIS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.6
PRICING ANALYSIS (2023-2025)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.6.1
AVERAGE SELLING PRICE TREND, BY KEY PLAYER (2023–2025)
 
 
 
 
 
5.7
TRADE ANALYSIS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.7.1
IMPORT SCENARIO (HS CODE 901890)
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.7.2
EXPORT DATA (HS CODE 901890)
 
 
 
 
 
5.8
KEY CONFERENCES AND EVENTS, 2026–2027
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.9
TRENDS/DISRUPTIONS IMPACTING CUSTOMERS’ BUSINESSES
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.10
INVESTMENT AND FUNDING SCENARIO
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.11
IMPACT OF 2025 US TARIFFS—US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.11.1
INTRODUCTION
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.11.2
PRICE IMPACT ANALYSIS
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.11.3
COUNTRY-SPECIFIC IMPACT
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.11.4
END-USE INDUSTRY IMPACT
 
 
 
 
6
TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENTS, AI-DRIVEN IMPACT, PATENTS, INNOVATIONS, AND FUTURE APPLICATIONS
AI and emerging technologies revolutionize US CSTD market through innovation, integration, and commercialization.
 
 
 
 
 
40
 
6.1
KEY EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
6.1.1
NEEDLE-FREE SYSTEMS
 
 
 
 
 
6.2
COMPLEMENTARY TECHNOLOGIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
6.2.1
INTEGRATION OF SENSORS IN CSTDS
 
 
 
 
 
6.3
TECHNOLOGY/PRODUCT ROADMAP
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
6.3.1
SHORT-TERM (2025–2027) | FOUNDATION & EARLY COMMERCIALIZATION
 
 
 
 
 
 
6.3.2
MID-TERM (2027–2030) | EXPANSION & STANDARDIZATION
 
 
 
 
 
 
6.3.3
LONG-TERM (2030–2035+) | MASS COMMERCIALIZATION & DISRUPTION
 
 
 
 
 
6.4
PATENT ANALYSIS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
6.5
FUTURE APPLICATIONS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
6.5.1
INTEGRATED HAZARDOUS-DRUG HANDLING & ADVANCED CSTD SYSTEMS
 
 
 
 
 
 
6.5.2
AUTOMATED COMPOUNDING, SMART MONITORING & CONNECTED SAFETY ECOSYSTEMS
 
 
 
 
 
6.6
IMPACT OF AI/GEN AI ON US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
6.6.1
TOP USE CASES AND MARKET POTENTIAL
 
 
 
 
 
 
6.6.2
CASE STUDIES OF AI IMPLEMENTATION
 
 
 
 
 
 
6.6.3
INTERCONNECTED ADJACENT ECOSYSTEMS AND IMPACT ON MARKET PLAYERS
 
 
 
 
 
 
6.6.4
CLIENTS’ READINESS TO ADOPT GENERATIVE AI IN US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET
 
 
 
 
7
REGULATORY LANDSCAPE AND SUSTAINABILITY INITIATIVES
Navigate complex regulations to drive sustainable practices and reduce carbon impact in US markets.
 
 
 
 
 
48
 
7.1
REGIONAL REGULATIONS AND COMPLIANCE
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
REGULATORY BODIES, GOVERNMENT AGENCIES,
 
 
 
 
 
 
7.1.2
INDUSTRY STANDARDS
 
 
 
 
 
7.2
SUSTAINABILITY INITIATIVES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7.2.1
CARBON IMPACT AND ECO-APPLICATIONS OF US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7.2.1.1
CARBON IMPACT REDUCTION
 
 
 
 
 
 
7.2.1.2
ECO-APPLICATIONS
 
 
 
 
7.3
SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT AND REGULATORY POLICY INITIATIVES
 
 
 
 
 
 
7.4
CERTIFICATIONS, LABELING, AND ECO-STANDARDS
 
 
 
 
 
 
7.5
REIMBURSEMENT ANALYSIS
 
 
 
 
 
8
CUSTOMER LANDSCAPE & BUYER BEHAVIOR
Unlock margin opportunities by navigating stakeholder influence and unmet needs in closed system transfer devices.
 
 
 
 
 
52
 
8.1
DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
 
 
 
 
 
 
8.2
BUYER STAKEHOLDERS AND BUYING EVALUATION CRITERIA
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8.2.1
KEY STAKEHOLDERS IN BUYING PROCESS
 
 
 
 
 
 
8.2.2
KEY BUYING CRITERIA
 
 
 
 
 
8.3
ADOPTION BARRIERS & INTERNAL CHALLENGES
 
 
 
 
 
 
8.4
UNMET NEEDS FROM VARIOUS END-USE INDUSTRIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
8.5
MARKET PROFITABILITY
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8.5.1
REVENUE POTENTIAL
 
 
 
 
 
 
8.5.2
COST DYNAMICS
 
 
 
 
 
 
8.5.3
MARGIN OPPORTUNITIES IN KEY APPLICATIONS
 
 
 
 
9
US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY TYPE
Market Size & Growth Rate Forecast Analysis to 2031 in USD Million | 1 Data Tables
 
 
 
 
 
58
 
9.1
INTRODUCTION
 
 
 
 
 
 
9.2
MEMBRANE-TO-MEMBRANE SYSTEMS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
9.2.1
INCREASING FOCUS ON SAFEGUARDING HEALTH AND WELL-BEING OF HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS TO EXPEDITE GROWTH
 
 
 
 
 
9.3
NEEDLELESS SYSTEMS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
9.3.1
EVOLVING MEDICAL DEVICE TECHNOLOGY LANDSCAPE TO STIMULATE GROWTH
 
 
 
 
10
US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY TECHNOLOGY
Market Size & Growth Rate Forecast Analysis to 2031 in USD Million | 1 Data Tables
 
 
 
 
 
61
 
10.1
INTRODUCTION
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.2
DIAPHRAGM-BASED DEVICES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.2.1
INCREASING USE OF DIAPHRAGM-BASED DEVICES IN CHEMOTHERAPY AND OTHER ONCOLOGY TREATMENTS TO FOSTER GROWTH
 
 
 
 
 
10.3
COMPARTMENTALIZED DEVICES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.3.1
NEED TO MAINTAIN INTEGRITY OF MEDICATIONS DURING TRANSFER TO SUSTAIN GROWTH
 
 
 
 
 
10.4
AIR CLEANING/FILTRATION DEVICES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.4.1
NEED FOR CLEAN AND STERILE ENVIRONMENT WITHIN PHARMACEUTICAL AND HEALTHCARE FACILITIES TO FACILITATE GROWTH
 
 
 
 
11
US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY COMPONENT
Market Size & Growth Rate Forecast Analysis to 2031 in USD Million | 1 Data Tables
 
 
 
 
 
64
 
11.1
INTRODUCTION
 
 
 
 
 
 
11.2
FEMALE COMPONENTS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
11.2.1
SECURE CONNECTIVITY AND CONTAMINATION PREVENTION TO DRIVE FEMALE COMPONENT ADOPTION
 
 
 
 
 
11.3
VIAL ACCESS COMPONENTS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
11.3.1
GROWING CONCERNS SURROUNDING HEALTHCARE-ASSOCIATED INFECTIONS TO DRIVE MARKET
 
 
 
 
 
11.4
MALE LUERS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
11.4.1
NEED TO PREVENT AIR EMBOLISM AND PRESERVE INTEGRITY OF INTRAVENOUS SYSTEMS TO PROMOTE GROWTH
 
 
 
 
 
11.5
BAG SPIKES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
11.5.1
GROWING FOCUS ON ENHANCED SAFETY, EFFICIENCY, AND PRECISION IN HANDLING AND ADMINISTERING HAZARDOUS DRUGS TO BOOST MARKET
 
 
 
 
 
11.6
OTHER COMPONENTS
 
 
 
 
 
12
US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY CLOSING MECHANISM
Market Size & Growth Rate Forecast Analysis to 2031 in USD Million | 1 Data Tables
 
 
 
 
 
68
 
12.1
INTRODUCTION
 
 
 
 
 
 
12.2
LUER LOCK SYSTEMS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
12.2.1
LUER LOCK SYSTEMS TO HOLD MAJOR MARKET SHARE
 
 
 
 
 
12.3
PUSH-TO-TURN SYSTEMS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
12.3.1
PUSH-TO-TURN SYSTEMS TO STRENGTHEN ADOPTION THROUGH EASE OF USE AND SECURE DRUG TRANSFER
 
 
 
 
 
12.4
CLICK-TO-LOCK SYSTEMS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
12.4.1
CLICK-TO-LOCK SYSTEMS TO SUPPORT MARKET GROWTH THROUGH RELIABLE CONNECTION CONFIRMATION AND USER SAFETY
 
 
 
 
 
12.5
COLOR-TO-COLOR ALIGNMENT SYSTEMS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
12.5.1
GROWING FOCUS ON CURBING RISK OF MEDICATION ERRORS TO FUEL MARKET
 
 
 
 
13
US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY END USER
Market Size & Growth Rate Forecast Analysis to 2031 in USD Million | 1 Data Tables
 
 
 
 
 
71
 
13.1
INTRODUCTION
 
 
 
 
 
 
13.2
HOSPITALS & CLINICS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
13.2.1
HOSPITALS & CLINICS SEGMENT TO HOLD LARGEST MARKET SHARE
 
 
 
 
 
13.3
ONCOLOGY CENTERS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
13.3.1
NEED TO MINIMIZE RISK OF OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE TO AUGMENT GROWTH
 
 
 
 
 
13.4
OTHER END USERS
 
 
 
 
 
14
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
Discover strategic moves and market dominance shaping US closed system transfer devices.
 
 
 
 
 
74
 
14.1
INTRODUCTION
 
 
 
 
 
 
14.2
KEY PLAYER STRATEGIES/RIGHT TO WIN
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
14.2.1
OVERVIEW OF STRATEGIES ADOPTED BY KEY PLAYERS IN US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET
 
 
 
 
 
14.3
REVENUE ANALYSIS, 2022–2025
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
14.4
MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS, 2025
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
14.5
COMPANY EVALUATION MATRIX: KEY PLAYERS, 2025
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
14.5.1
STARS
 
 
 
 
 
 
14.5.2
EMERGING LEADERS
 
 
 
 
 
 
14.5.3
PERVASIVE PLAYERS
 
 
 
 
 
 
14.5.4
PARTICIPANTS
 
 
 
 
 
 
14.5.5
COMPANY FOOTPRINT: KEY PLAYERS, 2025
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
14.5.5.1
COMPANY FOOTPRINT
 
 
 
 
 
 
14.5.5.2
CLOSING MECHANISM FOOTPRINT
 
 
 
 
 
 
14.5.5.3
TYPE FOOTPRINT
 
 
 
 
 
 
14.5.5.4
COMPONENT FOOTPRINT
 
 
 
 
 
 
14.5.5.5
TECHNOLOGY FOOTPRINT
 
 
 
 
 
 
14.5.5.6
END-USER FOOTPRINT
 
 
 
 
14.6
COMPANY VALUATION & FINANCIAL METRICS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
14.6.1
FINANCIAL METRICS
 
 
 
 
 
 
14.6.2
COMPANY VALUATION
 
 
 
 
 
14.7
BRAND/PRODUCT COMPARISON
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
14.8
COMPETITIVE SCENARIO
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
14.8.1
PRODUCT LAUNCHES & APPROVALS
 
 
 
 
15
COMPANY PROFILES
In-depth Company Profiles of Leading Market Players with detailed Business Overview, Product and Service Portfolio, Recent Developments, and Unique Analyst Perspective (MnM View)
 
 
 
 
 
88
 
15.1
KEY PLAYERS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
15.1.1
BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
15.1.1.1
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
 
 
 
 
 
 
15.1.1.2
PRODUCTS OFFERED
 
 
 
 
 
 
15.1.1.3
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
15.1.1.3.1
PRODUCT APPROVALS
 
 
 
 
15.1.1.4
MNM VIEW
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
15.1.1.4.1
RIGHT TO WIN
 
 
 
 
 
 
15.1.1.4.2
STRATEGIC CHOICES
 
 
 
 
 
 
15.1.1.4.3
WEAKNESSES & COMPETITIVE THREATS
 
 
 
15.1.2
ICU MEDICAL, INC.
 
 
 
 
 
 
15.1.3
B. BRAUN SE
 
 
 
 
 
 
15.1.4
EQUASHIELD
 
 
 
 
 
 
15.1.5
BAXTER
 
 
 
 
 
 
15.1.6
JMS CO., LTD.
 
 
 
 
 
 
15.1.7
CORMED
 
 
 
 
 
 
15.1.8
CODAN MEDIZINISCHE GERÄTE GMBH
 
 
 
 
 
 
15.1.9
EPIC MEDICAL
 
 
 
 
 
 
15.1.10
SHANDONG ANDE HEALTHCARE APPARATUS CO., LTD
 
 
 
 
 
15.2
OTHER PLAYERS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
15.2.1
ZEPHYRUS INNOVATIONS INC.
 
 
 
 
 
 
15.2.2
ASEPSIS MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
 
 
 
 
16
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
 
 
 
 
 
113
 
16.1
RESEARCH DATA
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
16.1.1
SECONDARY DATA
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
16.1.1.1
KEY DATA FROM SECONDARY SOURCES
 
 
 
 
 
16.1.2
PRIMARY DATA
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
16.1.2.1
KEY DATA FROM PRIMARY SOURCES
 
 
 
 
 
 
16.1.2.2
KEY INDUSTRY INSIGHTS
 
 
 
 
16.2
MARKET SIZE ESTIMATION
 
 
 
 
 
 
16.3
MARKET BREAKDOWN & DATA TRIANGULATION
 
 
 
 
 
 
16.4
MARKET RANKING ANALYSIS
 
 
 
 
 
 
16.5
STUDY ASSUMPTIONS
 
 
 
 
 
 
16.6
RESEARCH LIMITATIONS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
16.6.1
METHODOLOGY-RELATED LIMITATIONS
 
 
 
 
 
 
16.6.2
SCOPE-RELATED LIMITATIONS
 
 
 
 
 
16.7
RISK ASSESSMENT
 
 
 
 
 
17
APPENDIX
 
 
 
 
 
125
 
17.1
DISCUSSION GUIDE
 
 
 
 
 
 
17.2
KNOWLEDGESTORE: MARKETSANDMARKETS’ SUBSCRIPTION PORTAL
 
 
 
 
 
 
17.3
RELATED REPORTS
 
 
 
 
 
 
17.4
AUTHOR DETAILS
 
 
 
 
 
LIST OF TABLES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 1
US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET: INCLUSIONS & EXCLUSIONS
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 2
STANDARD CURRENCY CONVERSION RATES
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 3
US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET: PORTER’S FIVE FORCES ANALYSIS
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 4
AVERAGE SELLING PRICE TREND OF KEY PLAYERS 2023–2025 (USD)
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 5
IMPORT DATA FOR US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES UNDER HS CODE 901890, 2020–2025 (USD BILLION)
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 6
EXPORT DATA FOR US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES UNDER HS CODE 901890, 2020–2025 (USD BILLION)
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 7
US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET: DETAILED LIST OF KEY CONFERENCES AND EVENTS (2026-2027)
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 8
US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET: TOP USE CASES AND MARKET POTENTIAL
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 9
US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET: CASE STUDIES RELATED TO AI IMPLEMENTATION
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 10
INTERCONNECTED ADJACENT ECOSYSTEMS AND IMPACT ON MARKET PLAYERS
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 11
US: REGULATORY BODIES, GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 12
GLOBAL STANDARDS IN US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 13
CERTIFICATIONS, LABELING, AND ECO-STANDARDS IN US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 14
INFLUENCE OF STAKEHOLDERS ON BUYING PROCESS FOR US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES: FOR HOSPITALS & CLINICS
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 15
INFLUENCE OF STAKEHOLDERS ON BUYING PROCESS FOR US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES: FOR ONCOLOGY CENTERS
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 16
KEY BUYING CRITERIA FOR TOP 3 TECHNOLOGIES IN US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES: FOR HOSPITALS & CLINICS
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 17
KEY BUYING CRITERIA FOR TOP 3 TECHNOLOGIES IN US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES: FOR ONCOLOGY CENTERS
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 18
US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET: UNMET NEEDS/ END-USER EXPECTATIONS
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 19
US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY TYPE, 2024–2031 (USD MILLION)
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 20
US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2024–2031 (USD MILLION)
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 21
US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY COMPONENT, 2024–2031 (USD MILLION)
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 22
US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY CLOSING MECHANISM, 2024–2031 (USD MILLION)
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 23
US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY END USER, 2024–2031 (USD MILLION)
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 24
OVERVIEW OF STRATEGIES DEPLOYED BY KEY PLAYERS IN US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 25
US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET: CLOSING MECHANISM FOOTPRINT
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 26
US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET: TYPE FOOTPRINT
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 27
US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET: COMPONENT FOOTPRINT
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 28
US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET: TECHNOLOGY FOOTPRINT
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 29
US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET: END-USER FOOTPRINT
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 30
US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET: PRODUCT LAUNCHES & APPROVALS, JANUARY 2023–AUGUST 2026
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 31
BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY: COMPANY OVERVIEW
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 32
BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY: PRODUCTS OFFERED
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 33
BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY: PRODUCT APPROVALS, JANUARY 2023–AUGUST 2026
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 34
ICU MEDICAL, INC.: COMPANY OVERVIEW
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 35
ICU MEDICAL, INC.: PRODUCTS OFFERED
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 36
B. BRAUN SE: COMPANY OVERVIEW
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 37
B. BRAUN SE: PRODUCTS OFFERED
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 38
EQUASHIELD: COMPANY OVERVIEW
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 39
EQUASHIELD: PRODUCTS OFFERED
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 40
EQUASHIELD: PRODUCT APPROVALS, JANUARY 2023–AUGUST 2026
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 41
BAXTER: COMPANY OVERVIEW
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 42
BAXTER: PRODUCTS OFFERED
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 43
JMS CO., LTD.: COMPANY OVERVIEW
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 44
JMS CO., LTD.: PRODUCTS OFFERED
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 45
CORMED: COMPANY OVERVIEW
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 46
CORMED: PRODUCTS OFFERED
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 47
CODAN MEDIZINISCHE GERÄTE GMBH: COMPANY OVERVIEW
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 48
CODAN: PRODUCTS OFFERED
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 49
EPIC MEDICAL: COMPANY OVERVIEW
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 50
EPIC MEDICAL: PRODUCTS OFFERED
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 51
EPIC MEDICAL: PRODUCT APPROVALS, JANUARY 2023–AUGUST 2026
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 52
SHANDONG ANDE HEALTHCARE APPARATUS CO., LTD: COMPANY OVERVIEW
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 53
SHANDONG ANDE HEALTHCARE APPARATUS CO., LTD: PRODUCTS OFFERED
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 54
US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET: STUDY ASSUMPTIONS
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE 55
US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET: RISK ASSESSMENT ANALYSIS
 
 
 
 
 
 
LIST OF FIGURES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 1
US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET: SEGMENTS CONSIDERED
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 2
KEY INSIGHTS AND MARKET HIGHLIGHTS
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 3
US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, 2026 – 2031
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 4
MAJOR STRATEGIES ADOPTED BY KEY PLAYERS IN US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 5
DISRUPTIVE TRENDS IMPACTING GROWTH OF US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 6
HIGH-GROWTH SEGMENTS AND EMERGING FRONTIERS IN US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, 2025
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 7
RISING INCIDENCE OF CANCER IN US TO DRIVE MARKET GROWTH
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 8
LUER LOCK SYSTEMS AND PUSH-TO-TURN SYSTEMS HOLD MAJOR MARKET SHARES
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 9
US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET: DRIVERS, RESTRAINTS, OPPORTUNITIES, AND CHALLENGES
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 10
US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET: PORTER’S FIVE FORCES ANALYSIS
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 11
US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET: SUPPLY CHAIN ANALYSIS
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 12
US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET: VALUE CHAIN ANALYSIS
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 13
US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET: ECOSYSTEM ANALYSIS
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 14
TRENDS/DISRUPTIONS IMPACTING CUSTOMERS’ BUSINESSES IN US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 15
NUMBER OF PATENTS PUBLISHED (JANUARY 2015-AUGUST 2026)
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 16
INFLUENCE OF STAKEHOLDERS ON BUYING PROCESS FOR US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES: FOR HOSPITALS & CLINICS
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 17
INFLUENCE OF STAKEHOLDERS ON BUYING PROCESS FOR US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES: FOR ONCOLOGY CENTERS
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 18
KEY BUYING CRITERIA FOR US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES: FOR HOSPITALS & CLINICS
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 19
KEY BUYING CRITERIA FOR US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES: FOR ONCOLOGY CENTERS
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 20
REVENUE ANALYSIS OF KEY PLAYERS IN US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET (2022–2025)
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 21
MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS OF KEY PLAYERS IN US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES (2025)
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 22
US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET: COMPANY EVALUATION MATRIX (KEY PLAYERS), 2025
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 23
US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET: COMPANY FOOTPRINT
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 24
EV/EBITDA OF KEY VENDORS
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 25
YEAR-TO-DATE (YTD) PRICE TOTAL RETURN AND 5-YEAR STOCK BETA OF KEY VENDORS
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 26
US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET: BRAND/PRODUCT COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 27
BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY: COMPANY SNAPSHOT (2025)
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 28
ICU MEDICAL, INC.: COMPANY SNAPSHOT (2025)
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 29
B. BRAUN SE: COMPANY SNAPSHOT (2025)
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 30
BAXTER: COMPANY SNAPSHOT (2025)
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 31
JMS CO., LTD.: COMPANY SNAPSHOT (2025)
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 32
RESEARCH DESIGN
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 33
PRIMARY SOURCES
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 34
MARKET SIZE APPROACH: REVENUE SHARE ANALYSIS
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 35
TOP-DOWN APPROACH
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 36
BOTTOM-UP APPROACH
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 37
IMPACT ANALYSIS OF DRIVERS, RESTRAINTS, OPPORTUNITIES, AND CHALLENGES (2026–2031)
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 38
US CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET: CAGR PROJECTIONS
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 39
DATA TRIANGULATION METHODOLOGY
 
 
 
 
 
 

Methodology

The research study aimed to estimate the current size of the US closed system transfer devices market through several key activities. Comprehensive secondary research was conducted to gather information on the industry. The next step involved validating these findings, assumptions, and size estimates with industry experts across the value chain through primary research. To estimate the total market size, both top-down and bottom-up approaches were utilized. Following this, market segmentation and data triangulation procedures were employed to determine the sizes of different segments and subsegments within the US closed system transfer devices market.

Secondary Research

The secondary research process involved the widespread use of secondary sources, directories, databases (such as Bloomberg Businessweek, Factiva, and D&B Hoovers), white papers, annual reports, investor presentations, SEC filings of companies and publications from government sources, such as National Institutes of Health (NIH), US FDA, US Census Bureau, World Health Organization (WHO), International Trade Administration (ITA), Global Burden of Disease Study, and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) were referred to in order to identify and collect information for the US Closed system transfer devices market study. It was also used to obtain important information on key players, market classification & segmentation aligned with industry trends, and key developments from market and technology perspectives, down to the bottom-most level. A database of the key industry leaders was also prepared using secondary research.

Primary Research

In the primary research process, various sources from both the supply and demand sides were interviewed to obtain qualitative and quantitative information for this report. The primary sources on the supply side include industry experts, such as CEOs, vice presidents, marketing and sales directors, technology & innovation directors, and other key executives from leading companies and organizations in the US closed system transfer devices market. The primary demand-side sources include ambulatory surgical centers, hospitals, clinics, and other end users. Primary research was conducted to validate the market segmentation, identify key players and gather insights into key industry trends & key market dynamics.

A breakdown of the primary respondents is provided below:

US Closed System Transfer Devices Market Size, and Share

Note 1: C-level executives include CEOs, CFOs, COOs, and VPs.>
Note 2: Others include sales managers, marketing managers, business development managers, product managers, distributors, and suppliers.

Note 3: Companies are classified into tiers based on their total revenue. The tiers are as follows:
Tier 1 = > USD 10 billion, Tier 2 = USD 1 billion to USD 10 billion, and Tier 3 = <USD 1 billion

Source: MarketsandMarkets Analysis

To know about the assumptions considered for the study, download the pdf brochure

Market Size Estimation

For the market value, annual revenue figures were calculated based on the revenue mapping of major product manufacturers and OEMs active in the US closed system transfer devices market. All major product manufacturers were identified at the country/regional level. Revenue mapping for respective business segments/subsegments was done for the major players. Also, the US closed system transfer devices market was split into various segments and subsegments:

  • List of major players operating in the products market at the country level
  • Product mapping of various closed system transfer devices manufacturers at the regional and/or country level
  • Mapping of annual revenue generated by listed major players from the US closed system transfer devices market (or the nearest reported business unit/product category)
  • Extrapolation of the revenue mapping of the listed major players to derive the market value of the respective segments/subsegments
  • Summation of the market value of all segments/subsegments to arrive at the US closed system transfer devices market

US Closed System Transfer Devices Market : Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approach

US Closed System Transfer Devices Market Top Down and Bottom Up Approach

Data Triangulation

After determining the overall size of the US closed system transfer devices market using the methodology described above, the market was segmented into several segments and subsegments. The data triangulation and market breakdown procedures were employed, as applicable, to complete the overall market engineering process and obtain exact market value data for the key segments and subsegments. The extrapolated market data was triangulated by studying various macroindicators and regional trends from both demand- and supply-side participants.

Market Definition

Closed system transfer devices (CSTDs) are drug-transfer systems designed to mechanically prevent hazardous-drug vapors or concentrations from escaping into the environment and contaminants from entering the system. They provide closed connections during drug preparation, reconstitution, transfer, and administration, thereby reducing healthcare workers’ occupational exposure to hazardous drugs and minimizing contamination risks.

Key Stakeholders

  • Closed system transfer device (CSTD) manufacturing companies
  • CSTD component suppliers, raw material providers, and contract manufacturers
  • Pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies
  • Hazardous drug and oncology drug manufacturers
  • Hospital pharmacies and outpatient/ambulatory infusion pharmacies
  • Oncology centers, cancer treatment centers, and specialty clinics
  • Nurses and healthcare professionals administering hazardous drugs
  • US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
  • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
  • Healthcare professional associations and pharmacy organizations

Report Objectives

  • To describe, analyze, and forecast the US closed system transfer devices market by closing mechanism, component, type, technology, and end user
  • To describe and forecast the US closed system transfer devices market in the US
  • To provide detailed information regarding drivers, restraints, opportunities, and challenges influencing market growth
  • To strategically analyze micromarkets with respect to individual growth trends, prospects, and contributions to the overall market
  • To analyze market opportunities for stakeholders and provide details of the competitive landscape for market players
  • To profile key players and comprehensively analyze their market shares and core competencies in the US closed system transfer devices market
  • To analyze competitive developments such as partnerships, agreements & acquisitions, product launches, product approvals, and expansions in the US closed system transfer devices market
  • To analyze the impact of AI/Gen AI on the US closed system transfer devices market in terms of its capabilities, potential, and use cases

 

Personalize This Research

  • Triangulate with your Own Data
  • Get Data as per your Format and Definition
  • Gain a Deeper Dive on a Specific Application, Geography, Customer or Competitor
  • Any level of Personalization
Request A Free Customisation

Let Us Help You

  • What are the Known and Unknown Adjacencies Impacting the United States Closed System Transfer Devices Market
  • What will your New Revenue Sources be?
  • Who will be your Top Customer; what will make them switch?
  • Defend your Market Share or Win Competitors
  • Get a Scorecard for Target Partners
Customized Workshop Request

Custom Market Research Services

We Will Customise The Research For You, In Case The Report Listed Above Does Not Meet With Your Requirements

Get 10% Free Customisation

TESTIMONIALS

Growth opportunities and latent adjacency in United States Closed System Transfer Devices Market

DMCA.com Protection Status
popup img