US Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) Market by Offering {Software [Transmission (synchronous)], Integrated Device (Wearable, Implant, Handheld)}, Function (Cardiac, Glucose, Multiparameter), Application (Diabetes, Cardio, Neuro), End User - Forecast to 2030

icon1
USD 29.13 BN
MARKET SIZE, 2030
icon2
CAGR 12.6%
(2025-2030)
icon3
352
REPORT PAGES
icon4
303
MARKET TABLES

OVERVIEW

us-remote-patient-monitoring-rpm-market Overview

Source: Secondary Research, Interviews with Experts, MarketsandMarkets Analysis

The US Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) Market, valued at US$14.15 billion in 2024, stood at US$16.09 billion in 2025 and is projected to advance at a resilient CAGR of 12.6% from 2025 to 2030, culminating in a forecasted valuation of US$29.13 billion by the end of the period. The US remote patient monitoring industry is driven by technological innovations in FDA-approved wearable devices, mobile health applications, and monitoring solutions.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • By Component
    By component, the software segment is expected to register the highest CAGR of 14.6% during the forecast period.
  • By Indication
    By indication, the cardiology segment accounted for the largest share of 29.0% of the US remote patient monitoring (RPM) market in 2024.
  • By End User
    By end user, the patients segment is expected to register the highest CAGR of 13.1% during the forecast period.
  • Competitive Landscape
    Koninklijke Philips N.V., OMRON Healthcare Inc., and Medtronic were identified as Star players in the US remote patient monitoring (RPM) market, given their strong market share and product footprint.
  • Competitive Landscape
    CareSimple Inc., TimeDoc, Inc., and MD Revolution Inc. have distinguished themselves among startups and SMEs by securing strong footholds in specialized niche areas, underscoring their potential as emerging market leaders.

The remote patient monitoring (RPM) market in US is expanding steadily due to the growing adoption of home healthcare services and an increasing prevalence of chronic conditions in the country, along with the need for optimized efficiency and outcomes in healthcare delivery. The evolution of connected devices and analytics enabled by AI and cloud-enabled RPM solutions, along with the increasing adoption of hospital-at-home programs, is transforming the US RPM market.

TRENDS & DISRUPTIONS IMPACTING CUSTOMERS' CUSTOMERS

The operations of end users in the US remote patient monitoring (RPM) market are influenced by various factors, including changing patient demands, value-based care, and shifting trends in healthcare service delivery. Hospitals, ambulatory centers, home health organizations, and insurance companies are among the major end users of RPM solutions, focusing significantly on continuous patient monitoring and controlling costs. With the increasing trend of home health services, managing chronic patients, and delivering digitally oriented health services, coupled with reimbursement issues and data protection, these factors directly impact operations in the US RPM market. These trends are propelling the adoption of scalable, interoperable, and AI-driven RPM platforms in the US market.

us-remote-patient-monitoring-rpm-market Disruptions

Source: Secondary Research, Interviews with Experts, MarketsandMarkets Analysis

MARKET DYNAMICS

Drivers
Impact
Level
  • Digital transformation of patient care across US healthcare system
  • Shift toward routine adoption of virtual care by patients and clinicians
RESTRAINTS
Impact
Level
  • Interoperability limitations and EHR integration challenges within US healthcare systems
  • Fragmented reimbursement policies and complex billing requirements
OPPORTUNITIES
Impact
Level
  • Growing adoption of hospital-at-home and advanced care-at-home models in US
  • Expansion of chronic care management and remote therapeutic monitoring programs
CHALLENGES
Impact
Level
  • Limited integration of social determinants of health into US RPM programs
  • Data privacy, cybersecurity, and HIPAA compliance concerns

Source: Secondary Research, Interviews with Experts, MarketsandMarkets Analysis

Driver: Digital transformation of patient care across US healthcare system

The digital transformation of patient care within the US healthcare sector is a key driver of the growth in the remote patient monitoring (RPM) market, due to the increased adoption of connected technologies by providers to offer continuous patient care outside traditional clinical environments. Healthcare organizations are beginning to integrate RPM with iCare, electronic health records, telehealth, and virtual care platforms to facilitate the proactive management of chronic conditions, post-discharge patient care, and the implementation of the hospital-at-home model. This digitally enabled and patient-centric approach to patient care enables improved clinical access and reduces the need for in-person encounters, thereby driving the adoption of RPM in US hospitals, ASCs, and home health organizations.

Restraint: Interoperability limitations and EHR integration challenges within US healthcare systems

Despite the escalating adoption of remote patient monitoring solutions in the US market, interoperability constraints and EHR interoperability factors are the primary factors restraining market growth. Many remote patient monitoring solutions and devices are unable to integrate easily with popular EHR solutions. Such situations lead to the creation of health information silos. The unstandardized health IT infrastructure in the US health organizations makes it even more difficult to exchange health information in real-time.

Opportunity: Growing adoption of hospital-at-home and advanced care-at-home models in US

The rising adoption of hospital-at-home and advanced care-at-home programs in the US is a major opportunity for the RPM market. This is because healthcare organizations are adopting RPM technology platforms to provide acute and post-acute care in patients' homes due to the benefits they offer, including constant patient observation and real-time notifications. With the aim of relieving pressure on inpatient capacity and curbing healthcare expenditure, the RPM technology platform is becoming a crucial component in scaling up care at home.

Challenge: Limited integration of social determinants of health into US RPM programs

One of the biggest challenges in the US remote patient monitoring (RPM) market is the underutilization of social determinants of health (SDOH) in remote patient monitoring. Many remote patient monitoring solutions are centered on clinical and biometric information, while housing, nutrition, connectivity, and support as SDOH continue to be underrepresented in the remote patient monitoring process. Such underutilization may impact the effectiveness of remote patient monitoring strategies, particularly for vulnerable populations.

US Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) Market: COMMERCIAL USE CASES ACROSS INDUSTRIES

COMPANY USE CASE DESCRIPTION BENEFITS
Virtual care management and connected monitoring for chronic conditions (diabetes, COPD, heart disease) Reduces hospital readmissions, improves outcomes and patient engagement, and lowers care costs
VitalSight home blood pressure and weight monitoring linked to clinicians Enables early intervention, better hypertension control, and continuous patient oversight
MyCareLink Smart and Vital Sync for remote monitoring of implantable and hospital-to-home patients Early detection of complications, reduced hospital stay, and improved chronic care management
Deployment of RPM/virtual care solutions by combining GE’s inpatient/acute monitoring portfolio with home-based virtual care and remote monitoring Extends hospital-grade monitoring to home, improves capacity, and reduces readmissions
CardioMEMS HF System for remote monitoring of heart failure patients Cuts hospitalizations and mortality, enables proactive treatment, and enhances quality of life

Logos and trademarks shown above are the property of their respective owners. Their use here is for informational and illustrative purposes only.

MARKET ECOSYSTEM

The US remote patient monitoring market comprises equipment and wearable device manufacturers, remote patient monitoring software solution providers, connectivity solution/cloud services providers, and end-user stakeholders, including hospitals, home healthcare services organizations, insurance companies, and patients. These solutions enable the recording of real-time health information that can be transmitted via cloud services and integrated into clinical systems, making remote health services possible. The demand for improved healthcare outcomes and cost-effective, home-based care services primarily comes from end-user stakeholders.

us-remote-patient-monitoring-rpm-market Ecosystem

Logos and trademarks shown above are the property of their respective owners. Their use here is for informational and illustrative purposes only.

MARKET SEGMENTS

us-remote-patient-monitoring-rpm-market Segments

Source: Secondary Research, Interviews with Experts, MarketsandMarkets Analysis

US Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) Market, By Component

As of 2024, the devices segment represents the largest share of the remote patient monitoring (RPM) market in the US and is expected to maintain its leadership position through the end of 2025. These devices, which include wearable sensors, blood pressure monitors, glucose meters, pulse oximeters, and cardiac monitors, are fundamental to RPM initiatives. They play a crucial role in enabling continuous and simultaneous data streams from patients around the clock. The accuracy of these devices, along with advancements in sensor technology, the availability of cellular networks, and their user-friendly design, makes them essential for managing chronic diseases, monitoring patients after hospitalization, and supporting the hospital-at-home model in the US.

US Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) Market, By Indication

In 2024, the US remote patient monitoring (RPM) market was primarily dominated by the cardiology segment. This strong position is largely due to the high number of patients suffering from cardiac diseases. Key applications of RPM technologies include monitoring patients with hypertension, heart failure, and arrhythmias. These technologies play a crucial role in the early detection of complications and in ensuring that patients adhere to their medication regimens. Furthermore, RPM technology has proven to be effective in helping healthcare providers prevent hospitalizations. The favorable reimbursement landscape and clinical practices that support RPM technology have also contributed to the cardiology segment's prominence in the US RPM market.

US Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) Market, By End User

The healthcare providers segment is expected to drive the US remote patient monitoring market, primarily due to an increased focus by hospitals, physician practices, and health systems on remote patient monitoring solutions to support chronic care management, post-acute care, and value-based care delivery models. The use of remote patient monitoring by healthcare organizations has enabled continuous patient monitoring of vital signs using connected medical devices, wearables, and remote patient monitoring solutions, aiming to facilitate early interventions and prevent hospitalizations that were previously preventable. The emphasis by Medicare on reimbursing positive remote patient monitoring services has contributed significantly to enhancing operational efficiency and patient care among healthcare organizations.

US Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) Market: COMPANY EVALUATION MATRIX

In the US remote patient monitoring (RPM) market, Abbott (Star) is a market leader due to the widespread adoption of its CGM system and cardiomyopathy monitors. Additionally, the clinical acceptance of its solutions further solidifies its position at the top. On the other hand, Teladoc Health, Inc., an emerging leader in the market, is expanding its Chronic Care Online solution. This expansion is driven by analytics and powered by artificial intelligence, giving Teladoc significant potential to move toward a leadership position in this sector. While Abbott has a stronghold with its product offerings, Teladoc's promising developments indicate it could become a formidable competitor in the future.

us-remote-patient-monitoring-rpm-market Evaluation Metrics

Source: Secondary Research, Interviews with Experts, MarketsandMarkets Analysis

KEY MARKET PLAYERS

MARKET SCOPE

REPORT METRIC DETAILS
Market Size in 2024 (Value) USD 14.15 Billion
Market Forecast in 2030 (Value) USD 29.13 Billion
Growth Rate CAGR of 12.6% from 2025–2030
Years Considered 2023–2030
Base Year 2024
Forecast Period 2025–2030
Units Considered Value (USD Million/Billion)
Report Coverage Revenue forecast, company ranking, competitive landscape, growth factors, and trends
Segments Covered
  • By Component:
    • Devices
    • Software
    • Services
  • By Indication:
    • Cardiology
    • Diabetes
    • Oncology
    • Neurology
    • Sleep Disorders
    • Wellness Improvement
    • Respiratory Disorders
    • Mental Health
    • Other Indications
  • By End User:
    • Healthcare Providers
    • Healthcare Payers
    • Patients
    • Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology Companies
    • MedTech Companies
    • Other End Users
Countries Covered US

WHAT IS IN IT FOR YOU: US Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) Market REPORT CONTENT GUIDE

us-remote-patient-monitoring-rpm-market Content Guide

DELIVERED CUSTOMIZATIONS

We have successfully delivered the following deep-dive customizations:

CLIENT REQUEST CUSTOMIZATION DELIVERED VALUE ADDS
Map the US RPM ecosystem Structured mapping of RPM device manufacturers, software platforms, providers, home healthcare agencies, payers, pharmacies, employers, and regulators (CMS, FDA, ONC) Clear visibility into ecosystem dynamics and partnership opportunities
Understand RPM integration with US healthcare infrastructure Analysis of RPM–EHR integration (Epic, Oracle Health), connectivity standards (FHIR, HL7, cellular/Bluetooth), cloud deployment, and HIPAA requirements Reduced integration risk and faster implementation timelines
Identify high-ROI RPM use cases for providers and payers Prioritized use cases across cardiology, diabetes, COPD, post-acute care, and hospital-at-home programs Focus on scalable, reimbursement-aligned RPM models
Benchmark competitors in the US RPM landscape Capability benchmarking of key RPM players (Abbott, Biofourmis, Teladoc Health, Masimo, Philips, Dexcom) Identification of competitive gaps and differentiation opportunities
Assess policy, reimbursement, and regulatory impacts Evaluation of CMS RPM/RTM CPT pathways, Medicare Advantage adoption, FDA device requirements, and state telehealth policies Improved reimbursement readiness and regulatory compliance
Build a GTM strategy aligned with US RPM demand GTM framework covering provider-led vs. payer-led models, pricing strategy, distribution channels, and hospital-at-home adoption Stronger commercialization execution and revenue predictability

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

  • December 2025: Artella Solutions and VivaLink formed a collaboration to offer an end-to-end ambulatory cardiac monitoring solution, incorporating the wearable ECG technologies of VivaLink and the real-time cardiac monitoring SaaS offered by Artella.
  • October 2025: Koninklijke Philips N.V. has inked a strategic collaborative agreement on patient monitoring solutions with the Hoag Health System in the US, aiming to standardize and optimize patient monitoring practices at the two acute care hospitals of Hoag Health System. According to the strategic partnership, the patient monitoring system of Hoag Health System would adopt Philips’ EMaaS Solution. The system would incorporate the PIC iX Central Monitoring Solution.
  • February 2025: Teladoc Health acquired Catapult Health to enhance the management of chronic illnesses in the US by offering combined at-home testing and telehealth solutions, as well as other monitoring-enabled preventive healthcare solutions.

 

Table of Contents

Exclusive indicates content/data unique to MarketsandMarkets and not available with any competitors.

TITLE
PAGE NO
1
INTRODUCTION
 
 
 
15
2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
 
 
 
 
3
PREMIUM INSIGHTS
 
 
 
 
4
MARKET OVERVIEW
 
 
 
 
 
4.1
INTRODUCTION
 
 
 
 
4.2
MARKET DYNAMICS
 
 
 
 
 
4.2.1
DRIVERS
 
 
 
 
 
4.2.1.1
DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION OF PATIENT CARE ACROSS US HEALTHCARE SYSTEM
 
 
 
 
4.2.1.2
SHIFT TOWARD ROUTINE ADOPTION OF VIRTUAL CARE BY PATIENTS AND CLINICIANS
 
 
 
 
4.2.1.3
INCREASING COST PRESSURE ON US HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS TO LIMIT AVOIDABLE UTILIZATION
 
 
 
 
4.2.1.4
ADVANCEMENTS IN FDA-CLEARED WEARABLES, MHEALTH APPS, AND CONNECTED MONITORING TECHNOLOGIES
 
 
 
4.2.2
RESTRAINTS
 
 
 
 
 
4.2.2.1
INTEROPERABILITY LIMITATIONS AND EHR INTEGRATION CHALLENGES WITHIN US HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS
 
 
 
 
4.2.2.2
FRAGMENTED REIMBURSEMENT POLICIES AND COMPLEX BILLING REQUIREMENTS
 
 
 
 
4.2.2.3
HIGH UPFRONT IMPLEMENTATION COSTS AND UNCERTAIN ROI FOR SMALL AND INDEPENDENT PRACTICES
 
 
 
4.2.3
OPPORTUNITIES
 
 
 
 
 
4.2.3.1
GROWING ADOPTION OF HOSPITAL-AT-HOME AND ADVANCED CARE-AT-HOME MODELS IN US
 
 
 
 
4.2.3.2
EXPANSION OF CHRONIC CARE MANAGEMENT AND REMOTE THERAPEUTIC MONITORING PROGRAMS
 
 
 
 
4.2.3.3
INCREASING USE OF RPM FOR INFECTIOUS DISEASE SURVEILLANCE AND EARLY DETECTION
 
 
 
4.2.4
CHALLENGES
 
 
 
 
 
4.2.4.1
LIMITED INTEGRATION OF SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH INTO US RPM PROGRAMS
 
 
 
 
4.2.4.2
DATA PRIVACY, CYBERSECURITY, AND HIPPA COMPLIANCE CONCERNS
 
 
 
 
4.2.4.2
RISING CLINICIAN BURDEN DUE TO DATA OVERLOAD AND ALERT FATIGUE
 
 
4.3
UNMET NEEDS & WHITE SPACES
 
 
 
 
4.4
INTERCONNECTED MARKETS & CROSS-SECTOR OPPORTUNITIES
 
 
 
 
4.5
STRATEGIC MOVES BY TIER-1/2/3 PLAYERS
 
 
 
5
INDUSTRY TRENDS
 
 
 
 
 
5.1
PORTER’S FIVE FORCES ANALYSIS
 
 
 
 
5.2
MACROECONOMIC INDICATORS
 
 
 
 
 
5.2.1
INTRODUCTION
 
 
 
 
5.2.2
GDP TRENDS & FORECAST
 
 
 
 
5.2.3
TRENDS IN HEALTHCARE IT INDUSTRY
 
 
 
5.3
VALUE CHAIN ANALYSIS
 
 
 
 
 
5.4
ECOSYSTEM ANALYSIS
 
 
 
 
 
5.5
PRICING ANALYSIS
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.5.1
INDICATIVE PRICING FOR REMOTE PATIENT MONITORING (RPM) SOLUTIONS, BY KEY PLAYER (2024)
 
 
 
 
5.5.2
INDICATIVE PRICING FOR REMOTE PATIENT MONITORING (RPM) SOLUTIONS, BY DEVICE (2024)
 
 
 
5.6
KEY CONFERENCES & EVENTS, 2026–2027
 
 
 
 
5.7
TRENDS/DISRUPTIONS IMPACTING CUSTOMERS’ BUSINESSES
 
 
 
 
5.8
INVESTMENT & FUNDING SCENARIO
 
 
 
 
 
5.9
CASE STUDY ANALYSIS
 
 
 
6
STRATEGIC DISRUPTIONS THROUGH TECHNOLOGY, PATENTS, AND DIGITAL & AI ADOPTION
 
 
 
 
 
6.1
KEY EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES
 
 
 
 
6.2
COMPLEMENTARY TECHNOLOGIES
 
 
 
 
6.3
TECHNOLOGY/PRODUCT ROADMAP
 
 
 
 
6.4
PATENT ANALYSIS
 
 
 
 
 
6.5
FUTURE APPLICATIONS
 
 
 
 
6.6
IMPACT OF AI/GEN AI ON US REMOTE PATIENT MONITORING (RPM) MARKET
 
 
 
 
 
 
6.6.1
TOP USE CASES & MARKET POTENTIAL
 
 
 
 
6.6.2
BEST PRACTICES IN US REMOTE PATIENT MONITORING (RPM) MARKET
 
 
 
 
6.6.3
CASE STUDIES OF AI IMPLEMENTATION IN US REMOTE PATIENT MONITORING (RPM) MARKET
 
 
 
 
6.6.4
INTERCONNECTED ADJACENT ECOSYSTEMS & IMPACT ON MARKET PLAYERS
 
 
 
 
6.6.5
CLIENTS’ READINESS TO ADOPT GENERATIVE AI IN US REMOTE PATIENT MONITORING (RPM) MARKET
 
 
7
REGULATORY LANDSCAPE
 
 
 
 
 
7.1
REGIONAL REGULATIONS & COMPLIANCE
 
 
 
 
 
7.1.1
REGULATORY BODIES, GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS
 
 
 
 
7.1.2
INDUSTRY STANDARDS
 
 
8
CUSTOMER LANDSCAPE & BUYER BEHAVIOR
 
 
 
 
 
8.1
DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
 
 
 
 
8.2
BUYER STAKEHOLDERS & BUYING EVALUATION CRITERIA
 
 
 
 
 
8.2.1
KEY STAKEHOLDERS IN BUYING PROCESS
 
 
 
 
8.2.2
BUYING CRITERIA
 
 
 
8.3
ADOPTION BARRIERS & INTERNAL CHALLENGES
 
 
 
 
8.4
UNMET NEEDS FROM VARIOUS END-USE INDUSTRIES
 
 
 
9
US REMOTE PATIENT MONITORING (RPM) MARKET, BY COMPONENT (USD MILLION) (MARKET SIZE & FORECAST TO 2030)
 
 
 
 
 
9.1
INTRODUCTION
 
 
 
 
9.2
DEVICES
 
 
 
 
 
9.2.1
BY FUNCTION
 
 
 
 
 
9.2.1.1
CARDIAC MONITORING DEVICES
 
 
 
 
9.2.1.2
NEUROLOGICAL MONITORING DEVICES
 
 
 
 
9.2.1.3
RESPIRATORY MONITORING DEVICES
 
 
 
 
9.2.1.4
BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING DEVICES
 
 
 
 
9.2.1.5
FETAL & NEONATAL MONITORING DEVICES
 
 
 
 
9.2.1.6
WEIGHT MONITORING DEVICES
 
 
 
 
9.2.1.7
MULTIPARAMETER MONITORING DEVICES
 
 
 
 
9.2.1.8
PULSE OXIMETER DEVICES
 
 
 
 
9.2.1.9
THERMOMETERS
 
 
 
 
9.2.1.10
OTHER MONITORING DEVICES
 
 
 
9.2.2
BY TYPE
 
 
 
 
 
9.2.2.1
WEARABLE DEVICES
 
 
 
 
9.2.2.2
IMPLANTABLE DEVICES
 
 
 
 
9.2.2.3
HANDHELD & PORTABLE DEVICES
 
 
 
 
9.2.2.4
OTHER DEVICES
 
 
9.3
SOFTWARE
 
 
 
 
 
9.3.1
SOFTWARE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL
 
 
 
 
 
9.3.1.1
ON-PREMISES MODELS
 
 
 
 
9.3.2.2
CLOUD-BASED MODELS
 
 
 
9.3.2
SOFTWARE, BY TRANSMISSION TYPE
 
 
 
 
 
9.3.2.1
SYNCHRONOUS TRANSMISSION
 
 
 
 
9.3.2.2
ASYNCHRONOUS TRANSMISSION
 
 
9.4
SERVICES
 
 
 
10
US REMOTE PATIENT MONITORING (RPM) MARKET, BY INDICATION (USD MILLION) (MARKET SIZE & FORECAST TO 2030)
 
 
 
 
 
10.1
INTRODUCTION
 
 
 
 
10.2
ONCOLOGY
 
 
 
 
10.3
CARDIOLOGY
 
 
 
 
10.4
NEUROLOGY
 
 
 
 
10.5
DIABETES
 
 
 
 
10.6
SLEEP DISORDERS
 
 
 
 
10.7
RESPIRATORY DISEASES
 
 
 
 
10.8
WELLNESS IMPROVEMENT
 
 
 
 
10.9
MENTAL HEALTH
 
 
 
 
10.10
OTHER INDICATIONS
 
 
 
11
US REMOTE PATIENT MONITORING (RPM) MARKET, BY END USER (USD MILLION) (MARKET SIZE & FORECAST TO 2030)
 
 
 
 
 
11.1
INTRODUCTION
 
 
 
 
11.2
HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS
 
 
 
 
 
11.2.1
HOSPITALS
 
 
 
 
11.2.2
ASCS, ACCS, AND OTHER OUTPATIENT SETTINGS
 
 
 
 
11.2.3
LONG-TERM CARE & ASSISTED LIVING FACILITIES
 
 
 
 
11.2.4
HOME HEALTHCARE
 
 
 
 
11.2.5
OTHER HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS
 
 
 
11.3
HEALTHCARE PAYERS
 
 
 
 
11.4
PATIENTS
 
 
 
 
11.5
PHARMACEUTICAL & BIOTECHNOLOGY COMPANIES
 
 
 
 
11.6
MEDTECH COMPANIES
 
 
 
 
11.7
OTHER END USERS
 
 
 
12
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
 
 
 
 
 
12.1
OVERVIEW
 
 
 
 
12.2
KEY PLAYER STRATEGIES/RIGHT TO WIN
 
 
 
 
 
12.2.1
COMPETITIVE STRATEGIES INITIATIVES
 
 
 
12.3
REVENUE ANALYSIS, 2020–2024
 
 
 
 
 
12.4
MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS,
 
 
 
 
 
12.5
BRAND/PRODUCT COMPARISON
 
 
 
 
 
12.6
COMPANY EVALUATION MATRIX: KEY PLAYERS,
 
 
 
 
 
 
12.6.1
STARS
 
 
 
 
12.6.2
EMERGING LEADERS
 
 
 
 
12.6.3
PERVASIVE PLAYERS
 
 
 
 
12.6.4
PARTICIPANTS
 
 
 
 
12.6.5
COMPANY FOOTPRINT: KEY PLAYERS,
 
 
 
 
 
12.6.5.1
COMPANY FOOTPRINT
 
 
 
 
12.6.5.2
COMPONENT FOOTPRINT
 
 
 
 
12.6.5.3
INDICATION FOOTPRINT
 
 
 
 
12.6.5.4
END-USER FOOTPRINT
 
 
12.7
COMPANY EVALUATION MATRIX: STARTUPS/SMES,
 
 
 
 
 
 
12.7.1
PROGRESSIVE COMPANIES
 
 
 
 
12.7.2
RESPONSIVE COMPANIES
 
 
 
 
12.7.3
DYNAMIC COMPANIES
 
 
 
 
12.7.4
STARTING BLOCKS
 
 
 
 
12.7.5
COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING: STARTUPS/SMES,
 
 
 
 
 
12.7.5.1
DETAILED LIST OF KEY STARTUPS/SMES
 
 
 
 
12.7.5.2
COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING OF KEY STARTUPS/SMES
 
 
12.8
COMPANY VALUATION & FINANCIAL METRICS
 
 
 
 
12.9
COMPETITIVE SCENARIO
 
 
 
 
 
12.9.1
PRODUCT LAUNCHES
 
 
 
 
12.9.2
DEALS
 
 
 
 
12.9.3
EXPANSIONS
 
 
 
 
12.9.4
OTHERS
 
 
13
COMPANY PROFILES
 
 
 
 
 
13.1
KEY PLAYERS
 
 
 
 
 
13.1.1
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.
 
 
 
 
 
15.1.1.1
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
 
 
 
 
15.1.1.2
PRODUCTS/SOLUTIONS/SERVICES OFFERED
 
 
 
 
15.1.1.3
MNM VIEW
 
 
 
 
 
15.1.1.3.1
 
 
 
 
 
15.1.1.3.2
 
 
 
 
 
15.1.1.3.3
 
 
 
13.1.2
OMRON HEALTHCARE, INC. (SUBSIDIARY OF OMRON CORPORATION)
 
 
 
 
13.1.3
MEDTRONIC
 
 
 
 
13.1.4
GE HEALTHCARE
 
 
 
 
13.1.5
ABBOTT
 
 
 
 
13.1.6
ORACLE
 
 
 
 
13.1.7
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
 
 
 
 
13.1.8
NIHON KOHDEN CORPORATION
 
 
 
 
13.1.9
SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
 
 
 
 
13.1.10
BAXTER
 
 
 
 
13.1.11
BIOBEAT
 
 
 
 
13.1.12
VITALCONNECT
 
 
 
 
13.1.13
VIVALNK, INC.
 
 
 
 
13.1.14
CLEARARCH, INC.
 
 
 
 
13.1.13
OPTUM, INC. (VIVIFY HEALTH, PART OF OPTUM)
 
 
 
 
13.1.13
LIGHTBEAM
 
 
 
 
13.1.18
CLOUD DIAGNOSTICS CANADA ULC
 
 
 
 
13.1.19
TELADOC HEALTH, INC.
 
 
 
 
13.1.20
DEXCOM
 
 
 
13.2
OTHER PLAYERS
 
 
 
 
 
13.2.1
CARESIMPLE INC.
 
 
 
 
13.2.2
TIMEDOC, INC.
 
 
 
 
13.2.3
MD REVOLUTION INC.
 
 
 
 
13.2.4
OPTIMIZE HEALTH, INC.
 
 
 
 
13.2.5
HEALTH RECOVERY SOLUTIONS
 
 
14
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
 
 
 
 
 
14.1
RESEARCH DATA
 
 
 
 
 
14.1.1
SECONDARY DATA
 
 
 
 
 
14.1.1.1
KEY DATA FROM SECONDARY SOURCES
 
 
 
14.1.2
PRIMARY DATA
 
 
 
 
 
14.1.2.1
KEY DATA FROM PRIMARY SOURCES
 
 
 
 
14.1.2.2
KEY PRIMARY PARTICIPANTS
 
 
 
 
14.1.2.3
BREAKDOWN OF PRIMARY INTERVIEWS
 
 
 
 
14.1.2.4
KEY INDUSTRY INSIGHTS
 
 
14.2
MARKET SIZE ESTIMATION
 
 
 
 
 
14.2.1
BOTTOM-UP APPROACH
 
 
 
 
14.2.2
TOP-DOWN APPROACH
 
 
 
 
14.2.3
BASE NUMBER CALCULATION
 
 
 
14.3
MARKET FORECAST APPROACH
 
 
 
 
 
14.3.1
SUPPLY SIDE
 
 
 
 
14.3.2
DEMAND SIDE
 
 
 
14.4
DATA TRIANGULATION
 
 
 
 
14.5
FACTOR ANALYSIS
 
 
 
 
14.6
RESEARCH ASSUMPTIONS
 
 
 
 
14.7
RESEARCH LIMITATIONS & RISK ASSESSMENT
 
 
 
15
APPENDIX
 
 
 
 
 
15.1
DISCUSSION GUIDE
 
 
 
 
15.2
KNOWLEDGESTORE: MARKETSANDMARKETS’ SUBSCRIPTION PORTAL
 
 
 
 
15.3
CUSTOMIZATION OPTIONS
 
 
 
 
15.4
RELATED REPORTS
 
 
 
 
15.5
AUTHOR DETAILS
 
 
 

Methodology

The study involved major activities in estimating the current market size for the US remote patient monitoring market. Exhaustive secondary research was done to collect information on the US remote patient monitoring industry. The next step was to validate these findings, assumptions, and sizing with industry experts across the value chain using primary research. Different approaches, such as top-down and bottom-up, were employed to estimate the total market size. After that, the market breakup and data triangulation procedures were used to estimate the market size of the segments and subsegments of the US remote patient monitoring market.

Secondary Research

In the secondary research process, various secondary sources such as annual reports, press releases & investor presentations of companies, white papers, certified publications, articles by recognized authors, gold-standard & silver-standard websites, regulatory bodies, and databases (such as D&B Hoovers, Bloomberg Business, and Factiva) were referred to in order to identify and collect information for the study of US remote patient monitoring market. It was also used to obtain important information about the top players, market classification, and segmentation according to industry trends to the bottom-most level, geographic markets, and key developments related to the market. A database of the key industry leaders was also prepared using secondary research.

Primary Research

Extensive primary research was conducted after acquiring basic knowledge about the US remote patient monitoring market scenario through secondary research. Several primary interviews were conducted with market experts from both the demand side (Hospital directors, Hospital Vice Presidents, Department heads, and Critical care specialists ) and supply side (such as C-level and D-level executives, technology experts, product managers, marketing and sales managers, among others) across five major regions—North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, and Middle East & Africa. This primary data was collected through questionnaires, e-mails, online surveys, personal interviews, and telephonic interviews

To know about the assumptions considered for the study, download the pdf brochure

Market Size Estimation

Both top-down and bottom-up approaches were used to estimate and validate the total size of the US remote patient monitoring market. These methods were also used extensively to estimate the size of various subsegments in the market.

The research methodology used to estimate the market size includes the following:

US Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) Market

Data Triangulation

After arriving at the overall market size—using the market size estimation processes—the market was split into several segments and subsegments. To complete the overall market engineering process and arrive at the exact statistics of each market segment and sub-segment, data triangulation and market breakdown procedures were employed, wherever applicable. The data was triangulated by studying various factors and trends from both the demand and supply sides in the US remote patient monitoring market.

Market Definition

The US remote patient monitoring (RPM) market involves the use of technology to remotely monitor and manage patients' health conditions outside of traditional healthcare settings as well as in patient settings. It leverages devices such as wearables, sensors, and mobile applications to track vital signs and chronic diseases. RPM allows healthcare providers to access real-time data for better decision-making and personalized care.

Stakeholders

  • RPM Equipment and devices Manufacturers
  • Suppliers and Distributors of RPM Equipment
  • RPM software provider
  • Healthcare IT Service Providers
  • Healthcare Insurance Companies/Payers
  • Healthcare Institutions/Providers (Hospitals, Clinics, Medical Groups, Physician Practices, Diagnostic Centers, and Outpatient Clinics)
  • Venture Capitalists
  • Government Bodies/Regulatory Bodies
  • Corporate Entities
  • Accountable Care Organizations
  • RPM Resource Centers
  • Research and Consulting Firms
  • Medical Research Institutes
  • Clinical Departments

Report Objectives

  • To define, describe, and forecast the global US remote patient monitoring market based on component, indication, end user, and region.
  • To provide detailed information regarding the major factors (such as drivers, restraints, opportunities, and challenges) influencing the market growth
  • To strategically analyze micro-markets with respect to individual growth trends, prospects, and contributions to the overall US remote patient monitoring market
  • To analyze opportunities in the market for stakeholders and provide details of the competitive landscape for market leaders.
  • To strategically analyze the market structure profile of the key players of the US remote patient monitoring market and comprehensively analyze their core competencies.
  • To forecast the size of the market segments with respect to five regions, namely, North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, and the Middle East & Africa.
  • To track and analyze competitive developments such as product launches and enhancements and investments, partnerships, collaborations, acquisitions, expansions, funding, grant, agreements, sales contracts, product testing, FDA approval, product approval, and alliances in the US remote patient monitoring market during the forecast period.

 

Personalize This Research

  • Triangulate with your Own Data
  • Get Data as per your Format and Definition
  • Gain a Deeper Dive on a Specific Application, Geography, Customer or Competitor
  • Any level of Personalization
Request A Free Customisation

Let Us Help You

  • What are the Known and Unknown Adjacencies Impacting the US Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) Market
  • What will your New Revenue Sources be?
  • Who will be your Top Customer; what will make them switch?
  • Defend your Market Share or Win Competitors
  • Get a Scorecard for Target Partners
Customized Workshop Request

Custom Market Research Services

We Will Customise The Research For You, In Case The Report Listed Above Does Not Meet With Your Requirements

Get 10% Free Customisation

Growth opportunities and latent adjacency in US Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) Market

DMCA.com Protection Status