US Injectable Drug Delivery Market by Type (Device, Formulation), Therapeutic (Infectious Diseases, Cancer, Obesity), Usage Pattern (Immunization), Administration (Skin, Musculoskeletal), End Users (Hospital, Home Care) - Forecast to 2031

icon1
USD 465.15 BN
MARKET SIZE, 2031
icon2
CAGR 8.5%
(2026-2031)
icon3
250
REPORT PAGES
icon4
200
MARKET TABLES

OVERVIEW

us-injectable-drug-delivery-market Overview

Source: Secondary Research, Interviews with Experts, MarketsandMarkets Analysis

The US injectable drug delivery market, valued at US$285.81 billion in 2025, stood at US$309.90 billion in 2026 and is projected to advance at a resilient CAGR of 8.5% from 2026 to 2031, culminating in a forecasted valuation of US$465.15 billion by the end of the period. The growth of the veterinary contract manufacturing & research market is driven by the increasing adoption of biologics and long-acting injectables, rising demand for patient-centric and self-administration delivery systems, and the need for advanced formulation, device engineering, and scalable manufacturing capabilities. The expansion of specialty and chronic disease therapies, combined with the shift toward home-based care and connected delivery technologies, is further accelerating market growth.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • By Product
    By product, the formulations segment is expected to register the highest CAGR of 8.8%.
  • By Formulation Packaging
    By formulation packaging, the ampoules segment is expected to dominate the market with a 46.3% share in 2025.
  • By Therapeutic Application
    By therapeutic application, the obesity segment is projected to grow at the fastest rate from 2026 to 2031.
  • By Usage Pattern
    By usage pattern, the curative care segment accounted for the largest share of 66.1%.
  • By Site of Administration
    By site of administration, the dermal-based administration is expected to register the highest CAGR of 9.0%
  • By End User
    By end user, the hospitals & clinics segment dominated the market, with a share of 56.4% in 2025.
  • Competitive Landscape - Device Key Players
    BD, West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., and Cardinal Health were identified as key players in the US injectable drug delivery market, due to their extensive global reach and comprehensive product portfolios.
  • Competitive Landscape - Formulation Key Players
    Pfizer Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Merck & Co., Inc. were identified as some of the star players in the US injectable drug delivery market , given their large-scale manufacturing capacity and international presence.

The injectable drug delivery market in US is witnessing steady growth, driven by the expanding pipeline of biologics and specialty therapeutics, rising adoption of self-injection systems, and increasing demand for patient-centric and home-based treatment options. New advancements, such as AI-enabled formulation design, automation in fill-finish operations, smart and connected injection devices, and integrated drug–device development models, are reshaping the competitive landscape and accelerating innovation across the market. Strategic collaborations among pharmaceutical companies, device manufacturers, and CDMOs are further enhancing scalability, improving delivery efficiency, and supporting the development of next-generation injectable solutions.

TRENDS & DISRUPTIONS IMPACTING CUSTOMERS' CUSTOMERS

The impact on consumers’ businesses in the US injectable drug delivery market stems from rising demand for biologics, expanding chronic disease burdens, and rapid technological innovation in drug–device combinations. Pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, as well as healthcare providers, are primary adopters of advanced injectable systems, relying on specialized partners for device design, formulation optimization, and manufacturing scalability. The growing need for patient-friendly delivery formats, digital monitoring capabilities, and accelerated commercialization timelines is reshaping development strategies across the sector. These factors are driving stronger demand for integrated drug–device expertise and outsourcing collaboration, influencing market growth, competitiveness, and differentiation in the injectable delivery landscape.

us-injectable-drug-delivery-market Disruptions

Source: Secondary Research, Interviews with Experts, MarketsandMarkets Analysis

MARKET DYNAMICS

Drivers
Impact
Level
  • Growing demand for self-injection devices
  • Rising prevalence of chronic diseases
RESTRAINTS
Impact
Level
  • Infections associated with needlestick injuries
  • Stringent government regulations
OPPORTUNITIES
Impact
Level
  • Development of novel drug delivery systems
  • Growing preference for home-based care devices
CHALLENGES
Impact
Level
  • Alternative methods of drug delivery
  • Complexities in developing wearable drug delivery systems

Source: Secondary Research, Interviews with Experts, MarketsandMarkets Analysis

Driver: Growing demand for self-injection devices

The increasing shift toward patient-centric care and home-based treatment is driving demand for self-injection devices, including auto-injectors, pen injectors, prefilled syringes, and wearable injectors. These solutions support improved convenience, adherence, and disease management for chronic conditions like diabetes, autoimmune disorders, and obesity. As healthcare systems focus on reducing hospital burden and implementing remote monitoring, the preference for easy-to-use, minimally invasive self-administration options continues to drive market growth.

Restraint: Infections associated with needlestick injuries

Needlestick injuries pose a significant safety concern, as they can transmit infections and increase healthcare risks for clinicians and patients. These events contribute to rising liability costs, regulatory scrutiny, and increased adoption barriers, especially in hospital and clinical settings. The challenge of maintaining sterility, preventing accidental exposure, and improving disposal practices acts as a limiting factor, prompting higher investment in safety-engineered delivery solutions.

Opportunity: Development of novel drug delivery systems

Emerging technologies such as microneedle patches, connected injectors, long-acting formulations, and on-body wearable infusion devices create significant innovation opportunities. These advanced systems enable targeted, painless, and programmable drug delivery while supporting remote monitoring and personalized dosing. As biologics pipelines expand and demand for self-administration rises, companies developing next-generation delivery technologies can capture substantial market share and unlock new revenue streams.

Challenge: Alternative methods of drug delivery

Competition from alternative administration routes, such as oral, transdermal, inhalation, and intranasal delivery, poses a challenge for injectable systems. Many patients prefer non-invasive options, pushing pharmaceutical companies to explore reformulation and delivery technologies that reduce dependence on injections. As these alternatives evolve and improve in efficacy, they may limit the uptake of injectable solutions in certain therapeutic areas, prompting market players to innovate and enhance the value propositions for injectables.

US INJECTABLE DRUG DELIVERY MARKET: COMMERCIAL USE CASES ACROSS INDUSTRIES

COMPANY USE CASE DESCRIPTION BENEFITS
Provides needles, syringes, safety-engineered injection systems, and prefilled syringe technologies used across US hospitals and biopharma supply chains. Ensures safe drug administration, supports mass vaccination programs, and improves clinical workflow efficiency.
Develops and commercializes a wide range of injectable therapies, vaccines, and biologics used in US healthcare. Ensures broad therapeutic access, strong regulatory credibility, and rapid supply during public health needs.
Produces biologic injectables for oncology, immunology, infectious diseases, and hospital care. Enhances treatment outcomes, expands biologics availability, and ensures reimbursement-supported access.
Manufactures injectable metabolic therapies, biologics, and pen-injector compatible medicines for chronic care. Enables patient-friendly self-administration, strengthens adherence, and expands treatment reach in diabetes and obesity.
Delivers specialty biologic injectables, including long-acting and immunomodulatory formulations for autoimmune conditions. Improves durability of therapeutic response, supports value-based treatment outcomes, and reduces dosing burden for patients.

Logos and trademarks shown above are the property of their respective owners. Their use here is for informational and illustrative purposes only.

MARKET ECOSYSTEM

The ecosystem of the US injectable drug delivery market comprises a broad set of stakeholders that collectively drive innovation, device development, formulation engineering, and commercial delivery of injectable therapies. Core contributors include pharmaceutical companies, biologics manufacturers, device developers, and CDMOs that provide formulation support, fill–finish capabilities, packaging solutions, and drug–device integration services. These players collaborate closely with healthcare providers, biotech innovators, and research institutions that rely on advanced delivery systems to enhance therapeutic outcomes and improve patient access. Technology partners, such as AI-driven design platforms, digital health monitoring firms, and automation solution providers, are increasingly influencing the market by enhancing usability, data connectivity, and operational efficiency. Together, this ecosystem accelerates development, improves delivery performance, and supports the broader adoption of next-generation injectable products across the US healthcare landscape.

us-injectable-drug-delivery-market Ecosystem

Logos and trademarks shown above are the property of their respective owners. Their use here is for informational and illustrative purposes only.

MARKET SEGMENTS

us-injectable-drug-delivery-market Segments

Source: Secondary Research, Interviews with Experts, MarketsandMarkets Analysis

US Injectable Drug Delivery Market, By Product

As of 2025, formulations held the largest share in the US injectable drug delivery market because they are fundamental to ensuring drug stability, safety, and therapeutic efficacy, especially for biologics, peptides, and long-acting injectables. As the demand for complex molecules increases, the need for advanced formulation technologies that improve solubility, bioavailability, and sustained release grows significantly. Continuous innovation in extended-release solutions, preservative-free formats, and combination drug–device products further drives investment, making formulations a central and high-value segment in the injectable delivery landscape.

US Injectable Drug Delivery Market, By Formulation Packaging

In 2025, ampoules held the largest share because they provide secure, contamination-free packaging for sterile injectable solutions, especially vaccines, small-volume biologics, and sensitive liquid formulations. Their single-dose format minimizes dosing errors and infection risks, making them highly preferred in hospital and clinical settings. Additionally, ampoules are cost-efficient, compatible with automated filling systems, and widely accepted in regulatory frameworks, which supports high production and widespread adoption across pharmaceutical applications.

US Injectable Drug Delivery Market, By Therapeutic Application

As of 2025, autoimmune diseases accounted for the largest share because they require long-term, repeated injectable therapies such as biologics, monoclonal antibodies, and targeted immunomodulators. The rising prevalence of conditions like rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, and inflammatory bowel disease continues to increase demand for injectable treatments that offer superior efficacy over oral options. Strong innovation pipelines, expanding patient access programs, and growing adoption of self-injectable biologics further reinforce this segment’s dominant position in the market.

US Injectable Drug Delivery Market, By Usage Pattern

As of 2025, curative care held the largest share because injectable therapies are widely used for treating acute and chronic conditions where rapid onset, targeted delivery, and high efficacy are required. Diseases such as cancer, infections, autoimmune disorders, and metabolic conditions depend heavily on injectables for therapeutic intervention, driving consistent demand. The expanding biologics pipeline and increasing focus on disease-modifying treatments further strengthen the dominance of curative applications within the injectable drug delivery market.

US Injectable Drug Delivery Market, By Site of Administration

As of 2025, dermal-based administration held the largest share because it supports convenient self-injection, reduced pain perception, and improved patient compliance, especially for chronic therapies delivered subcutaneously or intradermally. Many biologics, vaccines, insulin products, and specialty injectables are designed for dermal routes due to better absorption, controlled delivery, and ease of use outside clinical settings. The growth of microneedle patches, auto-injectors, and wearable injectors further strengthens demand for dermal administration, reinforcing its dominant position in the market.

US Injectable Drug Delivery Market, By End User

Hospitals and clinics held the largest share because they are primary centers for administering injectable therapies, managing acute care cases, and initiating treatment for chronic conditions. They handle high patient volumes, specialized procedures, and complex injectable regimens that require trained healthcare personnel and monitoring. Additionally, strong infrastructure, access to emergency care, and higher adoption of advanced biologics and infusion-based therapies further reinforce their dominant role as key end-users in the injectable drug delivery market.

US INJECTABLE DRUG DELIVERY MARKET: COMPANY EVALUATION MATRIX

In the US injectable drug delivery market matrix, Pfizer Inc. (Star) leads with a dominant market presence, driven by its broad portfolio of sterile injectables, biologics, and large-scale manufacturing capabilities. The company’s position is strengthened by its advanced fill–finish infrastructure, extensive distribution network, and deep experience in drug–device integration, enabling consistent supply and strong adoption across therapeutic areas. Novartis AG (Emerging Leader) is rapidly gaining visibility through its expanding injectable biologics pipeline, investments in innovative delivery technologies, and strategic partnerships that enhance formulation development and patient-centric device design. While other global pharmaceutical companies continue to scale capacity and modernize their injectable platforms, Pfizer’s scale and Novartis’s accelerating innovation momentum position them prominently within the evolving US injectable drug delivery landscape.

us-injectable-drug-delivery-market Evaluation Metrics

Source: Secondary Research, Interviews with Experts, MarketsandMarkets Analysis

KEY MARKET PLAYERS

MARKET SCOPE

REPORT METRIC DETAILS
Market Size in 2025 (Value) USD 285.81 BN
Market Forecast in 2031 (Value) USD 465.15 BN
Growth Rate CAGR of 8.5% from 2026-2031
Years Considered 2024-2031
Base Year 2025
Forecast Period 2026-2031
Units Considered Value (USD Billion), Volume (Thousand Units)
Report Coverage Revenue forecast, company ranking, competitive landscape, growth factors, and trends
Segments Covered
  • By Product:
    • Devices
    • Formulations
  • By Formulation Packaging:
    • Ampoules
    • Vials
    • Cartridges
    • Bottles
  • By Therapeutic Application:
    • Autoimmune Diseases
    • Hormonal Disorders
    • Obesity
    • Cancer
    • Infectious Diseases
    • Orphan Diseases
    • Other Therapeutic Applications
  • By Usage Pattern (Curative Care, Immunization, Other Usage Patterns)
  • By Site of Administration (Dermal-based Administration, Circulatory/Musculoskeletal System-based Administration, Organ-based Administration, Central Nervous System-based Administration)
  • By End User:
    • Hospitals & Clinics
    • Home Care Settings
    • Long-term Care Settings
    • Nursing Homes
    • Other End Users
Regions Covered US

WHAT IS IN IT FOR YOU: US INJECTABLE DRUG DELIVERY MARKET REPORT CONTENT GUIDE

us-injectable-drug-delivery-market Content Guide

DELIVERED CUSTOMIZATIONS

We have successfully delivered the following deep-dive customizations:

CLIENT REQUEST CUSTOMIZATION DELIVERED VALUE ADDS
Product Analysis Comparison of key injectable drug delivery solutions in the US market, including auto-injectors, pen injectors, prefilled syringes, wearable injectors, microneedle patches, and vial/ampoule packaging formats. Highlighted capacity trends in biologics delivery, innovation in self-injection systems, connectivity features, and differentiation across major device developers and manufacturing partners. Enabled understanding of technology evolution, user preferences, and product positioning; supported decisions on partner selection, pipeline alignment, scalability planning, and investment in next-generation delivery platforms.
Company Information Key players: BD, West Pharmaceutical Services, Gerresheimer and Terumo. Provided top players’ portfolios, device manufacturing strengths, biologics compatibility, and competitive positioning in the US market. Delivered insights on collaboration trends, biologic drug–device integration opportunities, and innovation hotspots shaping auto-injectors, wearable systems, and smart injectable solutions.
Country-level volume Analysis Provided detailed volume analysis of various product types in the injectable drug delivery market across the US Supported strategic decision-making by helping identify high-volume product segments, regional demand hotspots, and growth pockets for product expansion.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

  • March 2025 : Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. announced that the US FDA approved the first and only IL-23 inhibitor, TREMFYA, with subcutaneous and intravenous induction options for adult Crohn’s disease patients.
  • February 2025 : Pfizer Inc. announced that the US FDA approved ADCETRIS for the treatment of relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) in adult patients.
  • October 2024 : BD collaborated with Ypsomed to advance self-injection solutions for high-viscosity biologic drugs. In a joint project, Ypsomed and BD have pre-assessed and streamlined the integration of the BD Neopak XtraFlow Glass Prefillable Syringe with Ypsomed’s YpsoMate 2.25 autoinjector platform, addressing current limitations by enabling the delivery of higher viscosity (> 15 cP) biologic drugs in an autoinjector format.

 

Table of Contents

Exclusive indicates content/data unique to MarketsandMarkets and not available with any competitors.

TITLE
PAGE NO
1
INTRODUCTION
 
 
 
 
15
2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
 
 
 
 
 
3
PREMIUM INSIGHTS
 
 
 
 
 
4
MARKET OVERVIEW
Outlines emerging trends, technology impact, and regulatory signals affecting growth trajectory and stakeholder decisions.
 
 
 
 
 
 
4.1
INTRODUCTION
 
 
 
 
 
4.2
MARKET DYNAMICS
 
 
 
 
 
 
4.2.1
DRIVERS
 
 
 
 
 
4.2.2
RESTRAINTS
 
 
 
 
 
4.2.3
OPPORTUNITIES
 
 
 
 
 
4.2.4
CHALLENGES
 
 
 
 
4.3
UNMET NEEDS AND WHITE SPACES
 
 
 
 
 
4.4
INTERCONNECTED MARKETS AND CROSS-SECTOR OPPORTUNITIES
 
 
 
 
 
4.5
STRATEGIC MOVES BY TIER-1/2/3 PLAYERS
 
 
 
 
5
INDUSTRY TRENDS
Maps the market evolution with focus on trend catalysts, risk factors, and growth opportunities across segments.
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.1
PORTER’S FIVE FORCES ANALYSIS
 
 
 
 
 
5.2
MACROECONOMIC OUTLOOK
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.2.1
INTRODUCTION
 
 
 
 
 
5.2.2
GDP TRENDS AND FORECAST
 
 
 
 
 
5.2.3
TRENDS IN US HEALTHCARE INDUSTRY
 
 
 
 
 
5.2.4
TRENDS IN US DRUG DELIVERY INDUSTRY
 
 
 
 
5.3
SUPPLY CHAIN ANALYSIS
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.4
VALUE CHAIN ANALYSIS
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.5
ECOSYSTEM ANALYSIS
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.6
PRICING ANALYSIS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.6.1
AVERAGE SELLING PRICE TREND OF KEY PLAYERS, BY END-USE INDUSTRY, (2022–2025)
 
 
 
 
 
5.6.2
AVERAGE SELLING PRICE TREND OF KEY PLAYERS, BY PRODUCT, (2022–2025)
 
 
 
 
5.7
TRADE ANALYSIS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.7.1
IMPORT SCENARIO (HS CODE 901890)
 
 
 
 
 
5.7.2
EXPORT SCENARIO (HS CODE 901890)
 
 
 
 
5.8
KEY CONFERENCES AND EVENTS, 2026–2027
 
 
 
 
 
5.9
TRENDS/DISRUPTIONS IMPACTING CUSTOMER BUSINESS
 
 
 
 
 
5.10
INVESTMENT AND FUNDING SCENARIO
 
 
 
 
 
5.11
SUCCESS STORIES AND REAL-WORLD APPLICATIONS
 
 
 
 
 
5.12
IMPACT OF 2025 US TARIFF – US INJECTABLE DRUG DELIVERY MARKET
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.12.1
INTRODUCTION
 
 
 
 
 
5.12.2
KEY TARIFF RATES
 
 
 
 
 
5.12.3
PRICE IMPACT ANALYSIS
 
 
 
 
 
5.12.4
IMPACT ON COUNTRY
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.12.4.1
US
 
 
 
 
5.12.5
IMPACT ON END-USE INDUSTRIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.12.5.1
HOSPITALS & CLINICS
 
 
 
 
 
5.12.5.2
HOME CARE SETTINGS
 
 
 
 
 
5.12.5.3
LONG-TERM CARE SETTINGS
 
 
 
 
 
5.12.5.4
NURSING HOMES
 
 
 
 
 
5.12.5.5
OTHER END USERS
 
 
 
NOTE: OTHER END USERS INCLUDE COSMETIC CLINICS, DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORIES, CLINICAL RESEARCH, ACADEMIC & RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS, AND HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS.
 
 
 
 
 
6
TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENTS, AI-DRIVEN IMPACT, PATENTS, INNOVATIONS, AND FUTURE APPLICATIONS
 
 
 
 
 
 
6.1
KEY EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
6.1.1
AUTOINJECTORS AND SMART INJECTION DEVICES
 
 
 
 
 
6.1.2
NEEDLE-FREE INJECTION SYSTEMS AND MICRONEEDLE PATCHES
 
 
 
 
6.2
COMPLEMENTARY TECHNOLOGIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
6.2.1
NANOTECHNOLOGY
 
 
 
 
 
6.2.2
BIODEGRADABLE POLYMERS
 
 
 
 
6.3
ADJACENT TECHNOLOGIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
6.3.1
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND DIGITAL THERAPEUTICS
 
 
 
 
 
6.3.2
ALTERNATIVE ROUTES OF ADMINISTRATION
 
 
 
 
6.4
TECHNOLOGY/PRODUCT ROADMAP
 
 
 
 
 
6.5
PATENT ANALYSIS
 
 
 
 
 
 
6.6
FUTURE APPLICATIONS
 
 
 
 
 
6.7
IMPACT OF AI/GEN AI ON US INJECTABLE DRUG DELIVERY MARKET
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
6.7.1
TOP USE CASES AND MARKET POTENTIAL
 
 
 
 
 
6.7.2
BEST PRACTICES IN US INJECTABLE DRUG DELIVERY MARKET
 
 
 
 
 
6.7.3
CASE STUDIES OF AI IMPLEMENTATION IN US INJECTABLE DRUG DELIVERY MARKET
 
 
 
 
 
6.7.4
INTERCONNECTED ADJACENT ECOSYSTEM AND IMPACT ON MARKET PLAYERS
 
 
 
 
 
6.7.5
CLIENTS’ READINESS TO ADOPT GENERATIVE AI IN US INJECTABLE DRUG DELIVERY MARKET
 
 
 
7
SUSTAINABILITY AND REGULATORY LANDSCAPE
 
 
 
 
 
 
7.1
REGIONAL REGULATIONS AND COMPLIANCE
 
 
 
 
 
 
7.1.1
REGULATORY BODIES, GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS
 
 
 
 
 
7.1.2
INDUSTRY STANDARDS
 
 
 
 
7.2
SUSTAINABILITY INITIATIVES
 
 
 
 
 
 
7.2.1
ENERGY-EFFICIENT SYSTEM DESIGN AND USE OF RECYCLABLE MATERIALS IN INJETCABLE DRUG DELIVERY PRODUCTS
 
 
 
 
7.3
SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT AND REGULATORY POLICY INITIATIVES
 
 
 
 
 
7.4
CERTIFICATIONS, LABELING, ECO-STANDARDS
 
 
 
 
8
CUSTOMER LANDSCAPE & BUYER BEHAVIOR
 
 
 
 
 
 
8.1
DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
 
 
 
 
 
8.2
BUYER STAKEHOLDERS AND BUYING EVALUATION CRITERIA
 
 
 
 
 
8.3
ADOPTION BARRIERS & INTERNAL CHALLENGES
 
 
 
 
 
8.4
UNMET NEEDS FROM VARIOUS END-USE INDUSTRIES
 
 
 
 
 
8.5
MARKET PROFITABILITY
 
 
 
 
9
US INJECTABLE DRUG DELIVERY MARKET, BY PRODUCT (MARKET SIZE & FORECAST TO 2031 – IN VALUE, USD MILLION & VOLUME IN THOUSAND UNITS)
 
 
 
 
 
 
COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF KEY INJECTABLE DRUG DELIVERY PRODUCTS, THEIR MARKET POTENTIAL, AND DEMAND PATTERNS BY VARIOUS MANUFACTURERS
Market Size, Volume & Forecast – USD Million
 
 
 
 
 
 
9.1
INTRODUCTION
 
 
 
 
 
9.2
GLOBAL VOLUME ANALYSIS OF INJECTABLE DRUG DELIVERY PRODUCTS, 2024–2031 (THOUSAND UNITS)
 
 
 
 
 
9.3
DEVICES
 
 
 
 
 
 
9.3.1
CONVENTIONAL INJECTION DEVICES
 
 
 
 
 
 
9.3.1.1
BY MATERIAL
 
 
 
 
 
 
9.3.1.1.1
GLASS INJECTABLE DEVICES
 
 
 
 
 
9.3.1.1.2
PLASTIC INJECTABLE DEVICES
 
 
 
 
9.3.1.2
BY PRODUCT
 
 
 
 
 
 
9.3.1.2.1
FILLABLE SYRINGES
 
 
 
 
 
9.3.1.2.2
PREFILLED SYRINGES
 
 
 
 
9.3.1.3
BY USABILITY
 
 
 
 
 
 
9.3.1.3.1
REUSABLE INJECTION DEVICES
 
 
 
 
 
9.3.1.3.2
DISPOSABLE INJECTION DEVICES
 
 
 
9.3.2
SELF-INJECTION DEVICES
 
 
 
 
 
 
9.3.2.1
NEEDLE-FREE INJECTORS
 
 
 
 
 
 
9.3.2.1.1
BY PRODUCT
 
 
 
 
 
9.3.2.1.2
BY TECHNOLOGY
 
 
 
 
 
9.3.2.1.3
BY USABILITY
 
 
 
 
9.3.2.2
AUTOINJECTORS
 
 
 
 
 
 
9.3.2.2.1
BY PRODUCT
 
 
 
 
 
9.3.2.2.2
BY TECHNOLOGY
 
 
 
 
 
9.3.2.2.3
BY DESIGN
 
 
 
 
 
9.3.2.2.4
BY USABILITY
 
 
 
 
9.3.2.3
PEN INJECTORS
 
 
 
 
 
 
9.3.2.3.1
BY PRODUCT
 
 
 
 
 
9.3.2.3.2
BY DESIGN
 
 
 
 
 
9.3.2.3.3
BY USABILITY
 
 
 
 
9.3.2.4
WEARABLE INJECTORS
 
 
 
 
 
9.3.2.5
OTHER SELF-INJECTION DEVICES
 
 
 
NOTE: OTHER INJECTABLE DEVICES INCLUDE BLUNT NEEDLES, MICRONEEDLES, AND NANONEEDLE INJECTIONS.
 
 
 
 
 
 
9.4
FORMULATIONS
 
 
 
 
 
 
9.4.1
CONVENTIONAL DRUG DELIVERY FORMULATIONS
 
 
 
 
 
 
9.4.1.1
SOLUTIONS
 
 
 
 
 
9.4.1.2
RECONSTITUTED/LYOPHILIZED FORMULATIONS
 
 
 
 
 
9.4.1.3
SUSPENSIONS
 
 
 
 
 
9.4.1.4
EMULSIONS
 
 
 
 
9.4.2
NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY FORMULATIONS
 
 
 
 
 
 
9.4.2.1
COLLOIDAL DISPERSIONS
 
 
 
 
 
 
9.4.2.1.1
NIOSOMES
 
 
 
 
 
9.4.2.1.2
LIPOSOMES
 
 
 
 
 
9.4.2.1.3
POLYMERIC/MIXED MICELLES
 
 
 
 
 
9.4.2.1.4
NANOPARTICLES
 
 
 
 
9.4.2.2
MICROPARTICLES
 
 
 
 
 
 
9.4.2.2.1
MICROSPHERES
 
 
 
 
 
9.4.2.2.2
MICROCAPSULES
 
 
 
9.4.3
LONG-ACTING INJECTABLE FORMULATIONS
 
 
 
10
US INJECTABLE DRUG DELIVERY MARKET, BY FORMULATION PACKAGING (MARKET SIZE & FORECAST TO 2031 – IN VALUE, USD MILLION & VOLUME IN THOUSAND UNITS)
 
 
 
 
 
 
FORMULATION PACKAGING-WISE DEMAND POTENTIAL AND GROWTH PATHWAYS SHAPING INJETCABLE DRUG DELIVERY ADOPTION IN DIVERSE INDUSTRIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.1
INTRODUCTION
 
 
 
 
 
10.2
AMPOULES
 
 
 
 
 
10.3
VIALS
 
 
 
 
 
10.4
CARTRIDGES
 
 
 
 
 
10.5
BOTTLES
 
 
 
 
11
US INJECTABLE DRUG DELIVERY MARKET, BY THERAPEUTIC APPLICATION (MARKET SIZE & FORECAST TO 2031 – IN VALUE, USD MILLION & VOLUME IN THOUSAND UNITS)
 
 
 
 
 
 
THERAPEUTIC APPLICATION-WISE DEMAND POTENTIAL AND GROWTH PATHWAYS SHAPING VETERINARY IMAGING ADOPTION IN DIVERSE INDUSTRIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
11.1
INTRODUCTION
 
 
 
 
 
11.2
AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES
 
 
 
 
 
 
11.2.1
RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
 
 
 
 
 
11.2.2
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS
 
 
 
 
 
11.2.3
CROHN’S DISEASE
 
 
 
 
 
11.2.4
PSORIASIS
 
 
 
 
 
11.2.5
OTHER AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES
 
 
 
 
11.3
HORMONAL DISORDERS
 
 
 
 
 
 
11.3.1
DIABETES
 
 
 
 
 
11.3.2
REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH DISEASES
 
 
 
 
 
11.3.3
ANTITHROMBOTIC/THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY
 
 
 
 
 
11.3.4
OSTEOPOROSIS
 
 
 
 
 
11.3.5
GROWTH HORMONE DEFICIENCY
 
 
 
 
11.4
OBESITY
 
 
 
 
 
11.5
CANCER
 
 
 
 
 
11.6
INFECTIOUS DISEASES
 
 
 
 
 
11.7
ORPHAN DISEASES
 
 
 
 
 
11.8
OTHER THERAPEUTIC APPLICATIONS
 
 
 
 
 
 
11.8.1
PAIN MANAGEMENT
 
 
 
 
 
11.8.2
ALLERGIES
 
 
 
 
 
11.8.3
AESTHETIC TREATMENTS
 
 
 
 
 
11.8.4
HEPATITIS C
 
 
 
 
 
11.8.5
HEMOPHILIA
 
 
 
 
NOTE: OTHER AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES INCLUDE HEPATITIS, ADDISON’S DISEASE, MYASTHENIA GRAVIS, PERNICIOUS ANEMIA, HASHIMOTO'S THYROIDITIS, CARDIOMYOPATHY, ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID SYNDROME, GUILLAIN-BARRÉ SYNDROME, SJÖGREN’S SYNDROME, AND ALOPECIA.
 
 
 
 
 
 
NOTE: OTHER THERAPEUTIC APPLICATIONS INCLUDE ALLERGIES, AESTHETIC TREATMENT, HEPATITIS C, AND HEMOPHILIA.
 
 
 
 
 
12
US INJECTABLE DRUG DELIVERY MARKET, BY USAGE PATTERN (MARKET SIZE & FORECAST TO 2031 – IN VALUE, USD MILLION & VOLUME IN THOUSAND UNITS)
 
 
 
 
 
 
USAGE PATTERN DEMAND PATTERNS AND GROWTH DRIVERS IMPACTING INJECTABLE DRUG DELIVERY ADOPTION
 
 
 
 
 
 
12.1
INTRODUCTION
 
 
 
 
 
12.2
CURATIVE CARE
 
 
 
 
 
12.3
IMMUNIZATION
 
 
 
 
 
12.4
OTHER USAGE PATTERNS
 
 
 
 
 
NOTE: OTHER USAGE PATTERNS INCLUDE BLOOD TRANSFUSION, BLOOD PRODUCTS, AND CONTRACEPTIVES.
 
 
 
 
 
13
US INJECTABLE DRUG DELIVERY MARKET, BY SITE OF ADMINISTRATION (MARKET SIZE & FORECAST TO 2031 – IN VALUE, USD MILLION & VOLUME IN THOUSAND UNITS)
 
 
 
 
 
 
SITE OF ADMINISTRATION-WISE DEMAND POTENTIAL AND GROWTH PATHWAYS SHAPING INJECTABLE DRUG DELIVERY ADOPTION IN DIVERSE INDUSTRIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
13.1
INTRODUCTION
 
 
 
 
 
13.2
DERMAL-BASED ADMINISTRATION
 
 
 
 
 
13.3
CIRCULATORY/MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM-BASED ADMINISTRATION
 
 
 
 
 
13.4
ORGAN-BASED ADMINISTRATION
 
 
 
 
 
13.5
CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM-BASED ADMINISTRATION
 
 
 
 
14
US INJECTABLE DRUG DELIVERY MARKET, BY END USER (MARKET SIZE & FORECAST TO 2031 – IN VALUE, USD MILLION & VOLUME IN THOUSAND UNITS)
 
 
 
 
 
 
SECTOR-SPECIFIC ADOPTION DRIVERS, DEMAND DYNAMICS, AND MARKET POTENTIAL ACROSS EACH END-USE INDUSTRY
 
 
 
 
 
 
14.1
INTRODUCTION
 
 
 
 
 
14.2
HOSPITALS & CLINICS
 
 
 
 
 
14.3
HOME CARE SETTINGS
 
 
 
 
 
14.4
LONG-TERM CARE SETTINGS
 
 
 
 
 
14.5
NURSING HOMES
 
 
 
 
 
14.6
OTHER END USERS
 
 
 
 
 
NOTE: OTHER END USERS INCLUDE COSMETIC CLINICS, DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORIES, CLINICAL RESEARCH, ACADEMIC & RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS, AND HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS.
 
 
 
 
 
15
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
 
 
 
 
 
 
STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT OF LEADING PLAYERS, MARKET SHARE, REVENUE ANALYSIS, COMPANY POSITIONING, AND COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKS INFLUENCING MARKET POTENTIAL
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
15.1
OVERVIEW
 
 
 
 
 
15.2
KEY PLAYER STRATEGIES/RIGHT TO WIN
 
 
 
 
 
15.3
REVENUE ANALYSIS
 
 
 
 
 
 
15.4
MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS
 
 
 
 
 
 
15.5
BRAND/PRODUCT COMPARISON
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
15.5.1
BD (BD PHYSIOJECT)
 
 
 
 
 
15.5.2
WEST PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES, INC. (SMARTDOSE SYSTEM)
 
 
 
 
 
15.5.3
CARDINAL HEALTH (MONOJECT)
 
 
 
 
15.6
COMPANY EVALUATION MATRIX: KEY PLAYERS,
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
15.6.1
STARS
 
 
 
 
 
15.6.2
EMERGING LEADERS
 
 
 
 
 
15.6.3
PERVASIVE PLAYERS
 
 
 
 
 
15.6.4
PARTICIPANTS
 
 
 
 
 
15.6.5
COMPANY FOOTPRINT: KEY PLAYERS,
 
 
 
 
 
 
15.6.5.1
COMPANY FOOTPRINT
 
 
 
 
 
15.6.5.2
PRODUCT FOOTPRINT
 
 
 
 
 
15.6.5.3
FORMULATION PACKAGING FOOTPRINT
 
 
 
 
 
15.6.5.4
THERAPEUTIC APPLICATION FOOTPRINT
 
 
 
 
 
15.6.5.5
USAGE PATTERN FOOTPRINT
 
 
 
 
 
15.6.5.6
SITE OF ADMINISTRATION FOOTPRINT
 
 
 
15.7
COMPANY EVALUATION MATRIX: STARTUPS/SMES,
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
15.7.1
PROGRESSIVE COMPANIES
 
 
 
 
 
15.7.2
RESPONSIVE COMPANIES
 
 
 
 
 
15.7.3
DYNAMIC COMPANIES
 
 
 
 
 
15.7.4
STARTING BLOCKS
 
 
 
 
 
15.7.5
COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING: STARTUPS/SMES,
 
 
 
 
 
 
15.7.5.1
DETAILED LIST OF KEY STARTUPS/SMES
 
 
 
 
 
15.7.5.2
COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING OF STARTUPS/SMES
 
 
 
15.8
COMPANY VALUATION AND FINANCIAL METRICS
 
 
 
 
 
15.9
COMPETITIVE SCENARIO
 
 
 
 
 
 
15.9.1
PRODUCT LAUNCHES
 
 
 
 
 
15.9.2
DEALS
 
 
 
 
 
15.9.3
EXPANSIONS
 
 
 
 
 
15.9.4
OTHER DEVELOPMENTS
 
 
 
16
COMPANY PROFILES
 
 
 
 
 
 
IN-DEPTH REVIEW OF COMPANIES, PRODUCTS, RECENT INITIATIVES, AND POSITIONING STRATEGIES IN THE US INJECTABLE DRUG DELIVERY MARKET LANDSCAPE
 
 
 
 
 
 
16.1
INJECTABLE DRUG DELIVERY DEVICE MANUFACTURERS
 
 
 
 
 
 
16.1.1
BD
 
 
 
 
 
16.1.2
WEST PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES, INC.
 
 
 
 
 
16.1.3
CARDINAL HEALTH
 
 
 
 
 
16.1.4
BAXTER
 
 
 
 
 
16.1.5
B. BRAUN SE
 
 
 
 
 
16.1.6
ICU MEDICAL, INC.
 
 
 
 
 
16.1.7
TERUMO CORPORATION
 
 
 
 
 
16.1.8
GERRESHEIMER AG
 
 
 
 
 
16.1.9
SCHOTT PHARMA
 
 
 
 
 
16.1.10
STEVANATO GROUP
 
 
 
 
16.2
INJETCABLE DRUG DELIVERY FORMULATION MANUFACTURERS
 
 
 
 
 
 
16.2.1
PFIZER INC.
 
 
 
 
 
16.2.2
JOHNSON & JOHNSON
 
 
 
 
 
16.2.3
MERCK & CO., INC.
 
 
 
 
 
16.2.4
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
 
 
 
 
 
16.2.5
ABBVIE INC.
 
 
 
 
 
16.2.6
AMGEN INC.
 
 
 
 
 
16.2.7
F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD
 
 
 
 
 
16.2.8
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
 
 
 
 
 
16.2.9
NOVARTIS AG
 
 
 
 
 
16.2.10
SANOFI
 
 
 
17
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
 
 
 
 
 
 
17.1
RESEARCH DATA
 
 
 
 
 
 
17.1.1
SECONDARY DATA
 
 
 
 
 
 
17.1.1.1
KEY DATA FROM SECONDARY SOURCES
 
 
 
 
17.1.2
PRIMARY DATA
 
 
 
 
 
 
17.1.2.1
KEY DATA FROM PRIMARY SOURCES
 
 
 
 
 
17.1.2.2
KEY PRIMARY PARTICIPANTS
 
 
 
 
 
17.1.2.3
BREAKDOWN OF PRIMARY INTERVIEWS
 
 
 
 
 
17.1.2.4
KEY INDUSTRY INSIGHTS
 
 
 
17.2
MARKET SIZE ESTIMATION
 
 
 
 
 
 
17.2.1
BOTTOM-UP APPROACH
 
 
 
 
 
17.2.2
TOP-DOWN APPROACH
 
 
 
 
 
17.2.3
BASE NUMBER CALCULATION
 
 
 
 
17.3
MARKET FORECAST APPROACH
 
 
 
 
 
 
17.3.1
SUPPLY SIDE
 
 
 
 
 
17.3.2
DEMAND SIDE
 
 
 
 
17.4
DATA TRIANGULATION
 
 
 
 
 
17.5
FACTOR ANALYSIS
 
 
 
 
 
17.6
RESEARCH ASSUMPTIONS
 
 
 
 
 
17.7
RESEARCH LIMITATIONS AND RISK ASSESSMENT
 
 
 
 
18
APPENDIX
 
 
 
 
 
 
18.1
DISCUSSION GUIDE
 
 
 
 
 
18.2
KNOWLEDGESTORE: MARKETSANDMARKETS’ SUBSCRIPTION PORTAL
 
 
 
 
 
18.3
CUSTOMIZATION OPTIONS
 
 
 
 
 
 
18.3.1
PRODUCT ANALYSIS
 
 
 
 
 
18.3.2
COMPANY INFORMATION
 
 
 
 
 
18.3.3
GEOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS
 
 
 
 
 
18.3.4
REGIONAL/COUNTRY LEVEL MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS
 
 
 
 
 
18.3.5
COUNTRY LEVEL VOLUME ANALYSIS
 
 
 
 
 
18.3.6
BY TYPE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS (TOP 5 PLAYERS)
 
 
 
 
 
18.3.7
ANY CONSULTS/CUSTOM REQUIREMENTS AS PER CLIENT REQUESTS
 
 
 
 
18.4
RELATED REPORTS
 
 
 
 
 
18.5
AUTHOR DETAILS
 
 
 
 
 
*CONTENTS IN THE TOC/ MARKET SEGMENTS ARE TENTATIVE AND MIGHT CHANGE AS THE RESEARCH PROCEEDS.
 
 
 
 
 
 
*LIST OF COMPANIES IS NOT EXHAUSTIVE AND MIGHT CHANGE DURING COURSE OF STUDY
 
 
 
 
 

Methodology

This study extensively used both primary and secondary sources. The research process involved studying various factors affecting the industry to identify segmentation types, industry trends, key players, competitive landscape, key market dynamics, and key player strategies.

Secondary Research

This research study involved the usage of comprehensive secondary sources; directories; databases such as Bloomberg Business, Factiva, and Dun & Bradstreet; white papers; annual reports; company house documents; investor presentations; and SEC filings of companies. Secondary research was used to identify and collect information useful for an extensive, technical, market-oriented, and commercial study of the US Injectable Drug Delivery Market. It was also used to identify key players in the market and classify and segment the industry based on trends to the most detailed level. Additionally, significant developments related to market and technology perspectives were noted. A database of the primary industry leaders was also created using secondary research.

Primary Research

In the primary research process, various sources from both the supply and demand sides were interviewed to obtain qualitative and quantitative information for this report. Primary sources from the supply side include project/sales/marketing/business development managers, presidents, CEOs, vice presidents, chairpersons, chief operating officers, chief strategy officers, directors, chief information officers, and chief medical information officers related to the US Injectable Drug Delivery Markets. Primary sources from the demand side include healthcare professionals from hospitals, nursing care facilities, long-term health centers, and ambulatory surgical centers.

Market Size Estimation

The total size of the US Injectable Drug Delivery Market was determined after data triangulation from three approaches, as mentioned below. After each approach, the weighted average of the three approaches was taken based on the level of assumptions used in each approach.

Data Triangulation

After arriving at the market size, the total market was divided into several segments and subsegments. Data triangulation and market breakdown procedures were employed wherever applicable to complete the overall market engineering process and arrive at the exact statistics for all segments and subsegments.

Market Definition

The US Injectable Drug Delivery Market encompasses products, technologies, and services involved in the administration of drugs through injections. It includes a broad range of devices such as conventional syringes, auto-injectors, pen injectors, prefilled syringes, and wearable injectors, as well as various formulations like solutions, suspensions, and emulsions specifically designed for injections. This market addresses the delivery of biologics, vaccines, insulin, cancer therapies, and other treatments requiring precise and rapid drug absorption. It caters to diverse settings, including hospitals, clinics, home care, and ambulatory centers.

Stakeholders

  • Injectable Drug and Device Manufacturing Companies
  • Pharmaceutical & Injectable Drug Manufacturing Companies
  • Healthcare Institutions (Hospitals & Outpatient Clinics)
  • Distributors and Suppliers of Injectable Drugs & Devices
  • Research Institutes
  • Health Insurance Payers
  • Market Research and Consulting Firms

Report Objectives

  • To define, describe, segment, and forecast the US Injectable Drug Delivery Market by product, therapeutic application, usage pattern, site of administration, end user, and region
  • To provide detailed information about the factors influencing market growth (such as drivers, restraints, opportunities, and challenges)
  • To analyze micromarkets with respect to individual growth trends, prospects, and contributions to the overall US Injectable Drug Delivery Market
  • To analyze market opportunities for stakeholders and provide details of the competitive landscape for key players
  • To forecast the size of the US Injectable Drug Delivery Market in six main regions (along with their respective key countries), namely, North America, Europe, the Asia Pacific, Latin America, the Middle East & Africa, and GCC countries
  • To profile the key players in the US Injectable Drug Delivery Market and comprehensively analyze their core competencies and market shares
  • To track and analyze competitive developments such as acquisitions, product launches, expansions, collaborations, agreements, and partnerships

 

Personalize This Research

  • Triangulate with your Own Data
  • Get Data as per your Format and Definition
  • Gain a Deeper Dive on a Specific Application, Geography, Customer or Competitor
  • Any level of Personalization
Request A Free Customisation

Let Us Help You

  • What are the Known and Unknown Adjacencies Impacting the US Injectable Drug Delivery Market
  • What will your New Revenue Sources be?
  • Who will be your Top Customer; what will make them switch?
  • Defend your Market Share or Win Competitors
  • Get a Scorecard for Target Partners
Customized Workshop Request

Custom Market Research Services

We Will Customise The Research For You, In Case The Report Listed Above Does Not Meet With Your Requirements

Get 10% Free Customisation

Growth opportunities and latent adjacency in US Injectable Drug Delivery Market

DMCA.com Protection Status