[70 Pages Report] The global in-vitro diagnostics market size is expected to be valued at USD 61.7 billion in 2020 and projected to reach USD 77.9 billion by 2025, growing at a CAGR of 4.8% during 2020-2025. The demand for in-vitro diagnostic products due to the COVID-19 pandemic is expected to increase mainly due to factors such as a sharp rise in market demand for PCR, NGS, serology based rapid-test products, the supportive regulatory landscape for product development & commercialization, and a sharp rise in target patient population. These factors have prompted market players to improve and strengthen their current manufacturing and distribution capabilities as well as to focus on product commercialization & upgrades.
Based on technology, the in-vitro diagnostics market is segmented into PCR, NGS, ELISA, rapid-tests, clinical chemistry, hematology, hemostasis, urinalysis, microbiology testing, and others. The PCR segment is expected to hold the largest share of the global in-vitro diagnostics market in 2020 – H1. Factors such as the increasing patient emphasis on effective & early patient screening, continued commercialization of novel COVID screening platforms by major players, early efforts of key players to address supply chain bottlenecks, and easy availability of controls & standards are driving the growth of this segment.
The US is expected to account for the largest share of the in-vitro diagnostics market in 2020 - H1, followed by Europe. This can primarily be attributed to the continuous commercialization of innovative diagnostic products coupled with ongoing advancements in the field of gene & immunoassay based products, the recent discovery of genetic biomarkers & their clinical role in immunoassay testing, supportive government policies & their emphasis on novel product development, and the significant expansion of target patient population.
As of 2019, some of the prominent players in the in-vitro diagnostics market are Roche Diagnostics (Switzerland), Abbott Laboratories (US), Thermo Fisher Scientific (US), Becton, Dickinson and Company (US), Bio-Rad Laboratories (US), Biomerieux (France), and QIAGEN (Germany), among others.
An analysis of the market developments between December 2019 to April 2020 revealed that product commercialization, developmental collaborations, and product distribution partnerships were adopted by market players to maintain a competitive position in the in-vitro diagnostics market to mitigate the COVID-19 impact. Product commercialization was the most widely adopted growth strategy.
Roche Diagnostics is the top player in the global in-vitro diagnostics market. Roche Diagnostics was the leading player in the IVD market. The company’s leading position in the IVD market is attributed to its diverse product portfolio across clinical chemistry, immunochemistry, molecular diagnostics, and tissue diagnostics products. The company also has a strong geographic presence across major healthcare markets in North America, Europe, Asia, as well as MEA, which enables it to cater to a large consumer base worldwide. To maintain its leadership position in the global IVD market, the company mainly focuses on product commercialization, developmental collaborations, and product distribution partnerships.
Report Metric |
Details |
Market size available for years |
2018–2025 |
Base year considered |
2019 |
Forecast period |
2020–2025 |
Forecast units |
Value (USD) |
Segments covered |
Product, end user, and region/country |
Geographies covered |
US, Germany, France, UK, Spain, Italy, China, Japan, Australia, India, South Korea, the Americas, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Middle East, and Africa |
Companies covered |
Major players covered include Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. (US), F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd. (Switzerland), QIAGEN NV (Netherlands), Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (US), bioMérieux S.A., Immucor, Inc. (US), Illumina, Inc. (US), Luminex Corporation (US), CareDx (US), Becton, Dickinson and Company (US), Hologic (US), GenDx (Netherlands), Biofortuna (UK), Takara Bio, and BAG Healthcare |
This research report categorizes the in-vitro diagnostics market into the following segments and subsegments:
To speak to our analyst for a discussion on the above findings, click Speak to Analyst
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
1.2 MARKET DEFINITION
1.3 RESEARCH SCOPE
1.3.1 SEGMENTS COVERED
1.3.2 GEOGRAPHIC SCOPE
1.3.3 YEARS CONSIDERED FOR THE STUDY
1.4 CURRENCY USED FOR THE STUDY
1.5 MAJOR MARKET STAKEHOLDERS
2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
2.1 RESEARCH DATA
2.1.1 SECONDARY DATA
2.1.2 PRIMARY DATA
2.2 MARKET ESTIMATION METHODOLOGY
2.2.1 REVENUE MAPPING MARKET ESTIMATION
2.2.2 PROCEDURE BASED BASED MARKET ESTIMATION
2.2.3 PRIMARY DATA VALIDATION
2.3 COVID-19 IMPACT ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
2.4 RESEARCH ASSUMPTIONS
2.5 RESEARCH LIMITATIONS
3 IN VITRO DIAGNOSTICS INDUSTRY ECOSYSTEM
3.1 MAJOR TECHNOLOGIES
3.2 KEY APPLICATION AREAS
3.3 PROMINENT END USER CATEGORIES
3.4 50 MAJOR GLOBAL MANUFACTURERS
4 IN VITRO DIAGNOSTICS: INDUSTRY INSIGHTS
4.1 MARKET DYNAMICS
4.1.1 DRIVERS
4.1.2 RESTRAINTS
4.1.3 OPPORTUNITIES
4.1.4 CHALLENGES
4.2 GLOBAL REGULATORY SCENARIO
4.3 GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAIN ASSESSMENT
5 IN VITRO DIAGNOSTICS MARKET ASSESSMENT FOR COVID IMPACT, BY TECHNOLOGY [USD MILLION; 2019, 2020 (H1), 2020 (H2), 2021, 2025]
5.1 POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION (PCR)
5.2 NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING (NGS)
5.3 MICROARRAY
5.4 ISOTHERMAL NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION (INAAT)
5.5 ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY (ELISA)
5.6 LATERAL FLOW ASSAY
5.7 HEMATOLOGY
5.8 HEMOSTASIS
5.9 URINANALYSIS
5.10 MICROBIAL TESTING
5.11 CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
5.12 OTHER TECHNOLOGIES
6 IN VITRO DIAGNOSTICS: END USER LANDSCAPE
6.1 HOSPITAL-BASED LABORATORIES
6.2 INDEPENDENT LABORATORIES
6.3 REFERENCE LABORATORIES
6.4 POINT-OF-CARE AND SELF TESTING
6.5 RESEARCHERS & ACADEMIA
6.6 OTHER END USERS
7 IN VITRO DIAGNOSTICS MARKET ASSESSMENT FOR COVID IMPACT, BY COUNTRY [USD MILLION; 2019, 2020 (H1), 2020 (H2), 2021, 2025]
7.1 US
7.2 GERMANY
7.3 UK
7.4 FRANCE
7.5 ITALY
7.6 SPAIN
7.7 CHINA
7.8 JAPAN
7.9 INDIA
7.10 SOUTH KOREA
7.11 AUSTRALIA
7.12 REST OF AMERICAS
7.13 REST OF EUROPE
7.14 REST OF ASIA-PACIFIC
7.15 MIDDLE EAST AND AFRICA
8 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
8.1 OVERVIEW
8.2 MARKET SHARE OF TOP 5 VENDORS (IN TERMS OF %REVENUE, AS OF 2019)
8.3 PRODUCT PORTFOLIO OF MAJOR VENDORS FOR COVID DIAGNOSTICS
8.4 RECENT STRATEGIC INITIATIVES (DURING DECEMBER 2019 – MARCH 2020)
8.4.1 PORTFOLIO DIVERSIFICATION
8.4.2 INVESTMENTS AND FUNDINGS
8.4.3 PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIPS
8.4.4 STRATEGIC COLLABORATIONS
9 MAJOR INDUSTRY USE CASES
9.1 IN VITRO DIAGNOSTIC VENDORS
9.2 ADJACENT INDUSTRY VENDORS
9.3 RAW MATERIAL AND COMPONENT SUPPLIERS
9.4 HEALTHCARE SOFTWARE PROVIDERS
The study involved four major activities in estimating the current size of the global in-vitro diagnostics market as well as impact assessment of the COVID-19 pandemic at the country level. Exhaustive secondary research was conducted to collect information on the market and its different subsegments. The next step was to validate these findings, assumptions, and sizing with industry experts across the value chain through primary research. Both top-down and bottom-up approaches were employed to estimate the total market size. After that, market breakdown and data triangulation were used to estimate the market size of segments and subsegments.
In the secondary research process, various secondary sources such as annual reports, press releases & investor presentations of companies, white papers, certified publications, articles by recognized authors, gold-standard & silver-standard websites, regulatory bodies, and databases (such as D&B Hoovers, Bloomberg Businessweek, and Factiva) were referred to identify and collect information for this study.
The global in-vitro diagnostics market comprises several stakeholders such as original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), product distributors and channel partners, hospitals and diagnostic centers, emergency care units and trauma centers, diagnostic laboratories, contract manufacturers and third-party suppliers, research laboratories and academic institutes, clinical research organizations (CROs), government and non-governmental regulatory authorities, and market research and consulting firms. Various primary sources from both the supply and demand sides of the market were interviewed to obtain qualitative and quantitative information. The following is a breakdown of the primary respondents:
To know about the assumptions considered for the study, download the pdf brochure
A detailed market estimation approach was followed to estimate and validate the value of the global in-vitro diagnostics market and other dependent submarkets, as mentioned below.
After arriving at the overall market size of the global in-vitro diagnostics market through the methodology as mentioned above, this market was split into several segments and subsegments. The data triangulation and market breakdown procedures were employed, wherever applicable, to complete the overall market engineering process and arrive at the exact market value data for key segments and subsegments. The extrapolated market data was triangulated by studying various macro indicators and regional trends from both the demand- and supply-side participants.
Benchmarking the rapid strategy shifts of the Top 100 companies in the COVID 19 Impact on IVD (In Vitro Diagnostics) Market
Request For Special Pricing
Growth opportunities and latent adjacency in COVID 19 Impact on IVD (In Vitro Diagnostics) Market